STORY THIRD.
THE WEEKLY NEWSPAPER.
I never shall forget what a sensation
it used to produce in our family, years ago, when
the newspaper came. We children—there
were three of us, one brother and two sisters—used
to watch for the post, on the all-important day, as
anxiously as a cat ever watched for a mouse. Peter
Packer, the bearer of these weekly dispatches, deserves
a little notice. He was a queer man, at least
he had that reputation in our neighborhood. As
long as I can remember, he went his rounds; and, for
aught I know, he is going to this day.
Peter’s old mare—she
must be mentioned, for the two are almost inseparable—was
as odd as he was. I should think she belonged
to the same general class and order with Don Quixote’s
renowned Rosinante; but she had one peculiarity which
is not put down in the description of Rosinante, to
wit, the faculty of diagonal or oblique locomotion.
This mare of Peter’s went forward something
after the manner of a crab, and a little like a ship
with the wind abeam, as the sailors say. It was
a standing topic of dispute among us boys, whether
the animal went head foremost or not. But that
did not matter much, so that she made her circuit—and
she always did, punctually; that is, she always came
some time or another. Sometimes she was a day
or two later than usual; but this never occurred except
in the summer season, and it was in this wise:
she had a most passionate love for the practical study
of botany; and not being allowed, when at home, to
pursue her favorite science as often as she wished,
owing partly to a want of specimens, and partly to
her master’s desire to educate her in the more
solid branches, she frequently took the liberty to
divest herself of her bridle, when standing at the
door of her master’s customers, and to gallop
away in search of flowers. She was a great lover
of botany, so much so, that, as I said before, her
desire to obtain specimens sometimes interfered a
little with her other literary engagements; and I am
sure I can forgive her—
“For e’en her failings leaned
to virtue’s side.”
Just so it was with Peter himself.
No storm, or tempest, or snow-bank, could detain him—that
is, not longer than a day or two—in his
weekly round. But he loved the theory of making
money as much as his mare loved botany; and he was
a practical student, too, and the road which he traveled
afforded a good many opportunities both for extending
his knowledge of that science and of practically applying
his principles. So, between the two, our newspaper
sometimes got thoroughly aired before it came to the
house. But Peter was punctual—I insist
upon it—for he always came some time or
another.
When the paper did come, we literally
devoured its contents. With us it was an oracle.
If the “Courier” affirmed or denied a thing,
that was enough for us. It was an end to all
debate. How confiding children are! He who
has read “Robinson Crusoe” when a boy,
finds it almost impossible to regard it a fable when
he is a man. The newspaper, that makes its weekly
visit to the family circle in the country, leaves
the marks of its influence upon the mind and the morals
of the child. It forms his tastes and controls
his character. How careful, then, should parents
be, in the selection of periodicals to be the companions
of their children.
* * * *
*