Tono Bungay

That is the last I shall tell of Bladesover.  The dropscene falls on that, and it comes no more as an actual presence into this novel.  I did indeed go back there once again, but under circumstances quite immaterial to my story.  But in a sense Bladesover has never left me; it is, as I said at the outset, one of those dominant explanatory impressions that make the framework of my mind.  Bladesover illuminates England; it has become all that is spacious, dignified pretentious, and truly conservative in English life.  It is my social datum.  That is why I have drawn it here on so large a scale.

When I came back at last to the real Bladesover on an inconsequent visit, everything was far smaller than I could have supposed possible.  It was as though everything had shivered and shrivelled a little at the Lichtenstein touch.  The harp was still in the saloon, but there was a different grand piano with a painted lid and a metrostyle pianola, and an extraordinary quantity of artistic litter and bric-a-brac scattered about.  There was the trail of the Bond Street showroom over it all.  The furniture was still under chintz, but it wasn’t the same sort of chintz although it pretended to be, and the lustre-dangling chandeliers had passed away.  Lady Lichtenstein’s books replaced the brown volumes I had browsed among—­they were mostly presentation copies of contemporary novels and the National Review and the Empire Review, and the Nineteenth Century and after jostled current books on the tables—­English new books in gaudy catchpenny “artistic” covers, French and Italian novels in yellow, German art handbooks of almost incredible ugliness.  There were abundant evidences that her ladyship was playing with the Keltic renascence, and a great number of ugly cats made of china—­she “collected” china and stoneware cats—­stood about everywhere—­in all colours, in all kinds of deliberately comic, highly glazed distortion.

It is nonsense to pretend that finance makes any better aristocrats than rent.  Nothing can make an aristocrat but pride, knowledge, training, and the sword.  These people were no improvement on the Drews, none whatever.  There was no effect of a beneficial replacement of passive unintelligent people by active intelligent ones.  One felt that a smaller but more enterprising and intensely undignified variety of stupidity had replaced the large dullness of the old gentry, and that was all.  Bladesover, I thought, had undergone just the same change between the seventies and the new century that had overtaken the dear old Times, and heaven knows how much more of the decorous British fabric.  These Lichtensteins and their like seem to have no promise in them at all of any fresh vitality for the kingdom.  I do not believe in their intelligence or their power—­they have nothing new about them at all, nothing creative nor rejuvenescent, no more than a disorderly instinct of acquisition; and the prevalence of them and their kind is but a phase in the broad slow decay of the great social organism of England.  They could not have made Bladesover they cannot replace it; they just happen to break out over it—­saprophytically.

Well—­that was my last impression of Bladesover.