Unity of plot does not, as some persons
think, consist in the Unity of the hero. For
infinitely various are the incidents in one man’s
life which cannot be reduced to unity; and so, too,
there are many actions of one man out of which we
cannot make one action. Hence, the error, as it
appears, of all poets who have composed a Heracleid,
a Theseid, or other poems of the kind. They imagine
that as Heracles was one man, the story of Heracles
must also be a unity. But Homer, as in all else
he is of surpassing merit, here too—whether
from art or natural genius—seems to have
happily discerned the truth. In composing the
Odyssey he did not include all the adventures of Odysseus—such
as his wound on Parnassus, or his feigned madness
at the mustering of the host—incidents between
which there was no necessary or probable connection:
but he made the Odyssey, and likewise the Iliad, to
centre round an action that in our sense of the word
is one. As therefore, in the other imitative arts,
the imitation is one when the object imitated is one,
so the plot, being an imitation of an action, must
imitate one action and that a whole, the structural
union of the parts being such that, if any one of them
is displaced or removed, the whole will be disjointed
and disturbed. For a thing whose presence or
absence makes no visible difference, is not an organic
part of the whole.
|