Since the objects of imitation are
men in action, and these men must be either of a higher
or a lower type (for moral character mainly answers
to these divisions, goodness and badness being the
distinguishing marks of moral differences), it follows
that we must represent men either as better than in
real life, or as worse, or as they are. It is
the same in painting. Polygnotus depicted men
as nobler than they are, Pauson as less noble, Dionysius
drew them true to life.
Now it is evident that each of the
modes of imitation above mentioned will exhibit these
differences, and become a distinct kind in imitating
objects that are thus distinct. Such diversities
may be found even in dancing,: flute-playing,
and lyre-playing. So again in language, whether
prose or verse unaccompanied by music. Homer,
for example, makes men better than they are; Cleophon
as they are; Hegemon the Thasian, the inventor of
parodies, and Nicochares, the author of the Deiliad,
worse than they are. The same thing holds good
of Dithyrambs and Nomes; here too one may portray
different types, as Timotheus and Philoxenus differed
in representing their Cyclopes. The same distinction
marks off Tragedy from Comedy; for Comedy aims at
representing men as worse, Tragedy as better than
in actual life.
|