If a man can get no other food it
is more natural for him to kill another man and eat
him than to starve. Our horror is rather at the
circumstances that make it natural for the man to do
this than at the man himself. So with other
things the desire for which is inherited through countless
ancestors, it is more natural for men to obtain the
nearest thing they can to these, even by the most abnormal
means if the ordinary channels are closed, than to
forego them altogether. The abnormal growth should
be regarded as disease but, nevertheless, as showing
more health and vigour than no growth at all would
do. I said this in Life and Habit (ch. iii.
p. 52) when I wrote “it is more righteous in
a man that he should eat strange food and that his
cheek so much as lank not, than that he should starve
if the strange food be at his command.” {30}
|