Then he set up the flag of red,
A’ set about wi’
bonnie blue.—P. 91. v. 1.
Blue was the favourite colour of the
Covenanters; hence the vulgar phrase of a true blue
whig. Spalding informs us, that when the first
army of Covenanters entered Aberdeen, few or none “wanted
a blue ribband; the lord Gordon, and some others of
the marquis (of Huntley’s) family had a ribband,
when they were dwelling in the town, of a red fresh
colour, which they wore in their hats, and called it
the royal ribband, as a sign of their love
and loyalty to the king. In despite and derision
thereof, this blue ribband was worn, and called the
Covenanter’s ribband, by the hail soldiers
of the army, who would not hear of the royal ribband,
such was their pride and malice.”—Vol.
I. p. 123. After the departure of this first
army, the town was occupied by the barons of the royal
party, till they were once more expelled by the Covenanters,
who plundered the burgh and country adjacent; “no
fowl, cock, or hen, left unkilled, the hail house-dogs,
messens (i.e. lap-dogs), and whelps, within Aberdeen,
killed upon the streets; so that neither hound, messen,
nor other dog, was left alive that they could see:
the reason was this,—when the first army
came here, ilk captain and soldier had a blue ribband
about his craig (i.e. neck); in despite and derision
whereof, when they removed from Aberdeen, some women
of Aberdeen, as was alleged, knit blue ribbands about
their messens’ craigs, whereat their soldiers
took offence, and killed all their dogs for this very
cause.”—P. 160.
I have seen one of the ancient banners
of the Covenanters: it was divided into four
copartments, inscribed with the words, Christ—Covenant—King—Kingdom.
Similar standards are mentioned in Spalding’s
curious and minute narrative, Vol. II. pp. 182,
245.
Hold up your hand, ye cursed Graeme,
Else a rebel to our king ye’ll
be.—P, 91. v. 5.
It is very extraordinary, that, in
April, 1685, Claverhouse was left out of the new commission
of privy council, as being too favourable to the fanatics.
The pretence was his having married into the presbyterian
family of lord Dundonald. An act of council was
also past, regulating the payment of quarters, which
is stated by Fountainhall to have been done in odium
of Claverhouse, and in order to excite complaints
against him. This charge, so inconsistent with
the nature and conduct of Claverhouse, seems to have
been the fruit of a quarrel betwixt him and the lord
high treasurer. FOUNTAINHALL, Vol. I. p.
360.
That Claverhouse was most unworthily
accused of mitigating the persecution of the Covenanters,
will appear from the following simple, but very affecting
narrative, extracted from one of the little publications
which appeared soon after the Revolution, while the
facts were fresh in the memory of the sufferers.
The imitation of the scriptural stile produces, in
some passages of these works, an effect not unlike
what we feel in reading the beautiful book of Ruth.
It is taken from the life of Mr Alexander Peden,[A]
printed about 1720.
“In the beginning of May, 1685,
he came to the house of John Brown and Marion Weir,
whom he married before he went to Ireland, where he
stayed all night; and, in the morning when he took
farewell, he came out of the door, saying to himself,
“Poor woman, a fearful morning,” twice
over. “A dark misty morning!” The
next morning, between five and six hours, the said
John Brown having performed the worship of God in his
family, was going, with a spade in his hand, to make
ready some peat ground: the mist being very dark,
he knew not until cruel and bloody Claverhouse compassed
him with three troops of horse, brought him to his
house, and there examined him; who, though he was
a man of a stammering speech, yet answered him distinctly
and solidly; which made Claverhouse to examine those
whom he had taken to be his guides through the muirs,
if ever they heard him preach? They answered,
“No, no, he was never a preacher.”
He said, “If he has never preached, meikle he
has prayed in his time;” he said to John, “Go
to your prayers, for you shall immediately die!”
When he was praying, Claverhouse interrupted him three
times; one time, that he stopt him, he was pleading
that the Lord would spare a remnant, and not make
a full end in the day of his anger. Claverhouse
said, “I gave you time to pray, and ye are begun
to preach;” he turned about upon his knees,
and said, “Sir, you know neither the nature of
preaching or praying, that calls this preaching.”
Then continued without confusion. When ended,
Claverhouse said, “Take goodnight of your wife
and children.” His wife, standing by with
her child in her arms that she had brought forth to
him, and another child of his first wife’s, he
came to her, and said, “Now, Marion, the day
is come, that I told you would come, when I spake
first to you of marrying me.” She said,
“Indeed, John, I can willingly part with you.”—“Then,”
he said, “this is all I desire, I have no more
to do but die.” He kissed his wife and bairns,
and wished purchased and promised blessings to be multiplied
upon them, and his blessing. Clavers ordered
six soldiers to shoot him; the most part of the bullets
came upon his head, which scattered his brains upon
the ground. Claverhouse said to his wife, “What
thinkest thou of thy husband now, woman?” She
said, “I thought ever much of him, and now as
much as ever.” He said, “It were justice
to lay thee beside him.” She said, “If
ye were permitted, I doubt not but your cruelty would
go that length; but how will ye make answer for this
morning’s work?” He said, “To man
I can be answerable; and for God, I will take him in
my own hand.” Claverhouse mounted his horse,
and marched, and left her with the corpse of her dead
husband lying there; she set the bairn on the ground,
and gathered his brains, and tied up his head, and
straighted his body, and covered him in her plaid,
and sat down, and wept over him. It being a very
desart place, where never victual grew, and far from
neighbours, it was some time before any friends came
to her; the first that came was a very fit hand, that
old singular Christian woman, in the Cummerhead, named
Elizabeth Menzies, three miles distant, who had been
tried with the violent death of her husband at Pentland,
afterwards of two worthy sons, Thomas Weir, who was
killed at Drumclog, and David Steel, who was suddenly
shot afterwards when taken. The said Marion Weir,
sitting upon her husband’s grave, told me, that
before that, she could see no blood but she was in
danger to faint; and yet she was helped to be a witness
to all this, without either fainting or confusion,
except when the shots were let off her eyes dazzled.
His corpse were buried at the end of his house, where
he was slain, with this inscription on his grave-stone:—
In earth’s cold bed, the dusty part
here lies,
Of one who did the earth as dust despise!
Here, in this place, from earth he took
departure;
Now, he has got the garland of the martyrs.
[Footnote A: The enthusiasm of
this personage, and of his followers, invested him,
as has been already noticed, with prophetic powers;
but hardly any of the stories told of him exceeds
that sort of gloomy conjecture of misfortune, which
the precarious situation of his sect so greatly fostered.
The following passage relates to the battle of Bothwell-bridge:—“That
dismal day, 22d of June, 1679, at Bothwell-bridge,
when the Lord’s people fell and fled before the
enemy, he was forty miles distant, near the border,
and kept himself retired until the middle of the day,
when some friends said to him, ’Sir, the people
are waiting for sermon,’ He answered, ’Let
them go to their prayers; for me, I neither can nor
will preach any this day, for our friends are fallen
and fled before the enemy, at Hamilton, and they are
hacking and hewing them down, and their blood is running
like water.” The feats of Peden are thus
commemorated by Fountainhall, 27th of March, 1650:
“News came to the privy council, that about one
hundred men, well armed and appointed, had left Ireland,
because of a search there for such malcontents, and
landed in the west of Scotland, and joined with the
wild fanatics. The council, finding that they
disappointed the forces, by skulking from hole to
hole, were of opinion, it were better to let them
gather into a body, and draw to a head, and so they
would get them altogether in a snare. They had
one Mr Peden, a minister, with them, and one Isaac,
who commanded them. They had frighted most part
of all the country ministers, so that they durst not
stay at their churches, but retired to Edinburgh,
or to garrison towns; and it was sad to see whole
shires destitute of preaching, except in burghs.
Wherever they came they plundered arms, and particularly
at my Lord Dumfries’s house.”—FOUNTAINHALL,
Vol. I. p. 359.]
“This murder was committed betwixt
six and seven in the morning: Mr Peden was about
ten or eleven miles distant, having been in the fields
all night: he came to the house betwixt seven
and eight, and desired to call in the family, that
he might pray amongst them; when praying, he said,
“Lord, when wilt thou avenge Brown’s blood?
Oh, let Brown’s blood be precious in thy sight!
and hasten the day when thou wilt avenge it, with
Cameron’s, Cargil’s, and many others of
our martyrs’ names; and oh! for that day, when
the Lord would avenge all their bloods!” When
ended, John Muirhead enquired what he meant by Brown’s
blood? He said twice over, “What do I mean?
Claverhouse has been at the Preshil this morning,
and has cruelly murdered John Brown; his corpse are
lying at the end of his house, and his poor wife sitting
weeping by his corpse, and not a soul to speak a word
comfortably to her.”
While we read this dismal story, we
must remember Brown’s situation was that of
an avowed and determined rebel, liable as such to military
execution; so that the atrocity was more that of the
times than of Claverhouse. That general’s
gallant adherence to his master, the misguided James
VII., and his glorious death on the field of victory,
at Killicrankie, have tended to preserve and gild
his memory. He is still remembered in the Highlands
as the most successful leader of their clans.
An ancient gentleman, who had borne arms for the cause
of Stuart, in 1715, told the editor, that, when the
armies met on the field of battle, at Sheriff-muir,
a veteran chief (I think he named Gordon of Glenbucket),
covered with scars, came up to the earl of Mar, and
earnestly pressed him to order the Highlanders to charge,
before the regular army of Argyle had completely formed
their line, and at a moment when the rapid and furious
onset of the clans might have thrown them into total
disorder. Mar repeatedly answered, it was not
yet time; till the chieftain turned from him in disdain
and despair, and, stamping with rage, exclaimed aloud,
“O for one hour of Dundee!”
Claverhouse’s sword (a strait
cut-and-thrust blade) is in the possession of Lord
Woodhouselee. In Pennycuik-house is preserved
the buff-coat, which he wore at the battle of Killicrankie.
The fatal shot-hole is under the arm-pit, so that
the ball must have been received while his arm was
raised to direct the pursuit However he came by his
charm of proof, he certainly had not worn the
garment usually supposed to confer that privelage,
and which is called the waistcoat of proof, or
of necessity. It was thus made: “On
Christmas daie, at night, a thread must be sponne
of flax, by a little virgine girle, in the name of
the divell: and it must be by her woven, and
also wrought with the needle. In the breast,
or forepart thereof, must be made with needle work,
two heads; on the head, at the right side, must be
a hat and a long beard; the left head must have on
a crown, and it must be so horrible that it maie resemble
Belzebub; and on each side of the wastcote must be
made a crosse.”—SCOTT’S Discoverie
of Witchcraft, p. 231.
It would be now no difficult matter
to bring down our popular poetry, connected with history,
to the year 1745. But almost all the party ballads
of that period have been already printed, and ably
illustrated by Mr Ritson.