This ballad appears to have been composed
about the reign of James V. It commemorates a transaction,
supposed to have taken place betwixt a Scottish monarch,
and an ancestor of the ancient family of Murray of
Philiphaugh in Selkirkshire. The editor is unable
to ascertain the historical foundation of the tale;
nor is it probable that any light can be thrown upon
the subject, without an accurate examination of the
family charter chest. It is certain, that, during
the civil wars betwixt Bruce and Baliol, the family
of Philiphaugh existed, and was powerful; for their
ancestor, Archibald de Moravia, subscribes the oath
of fealty to Edward I.A.D. 1296. It is, therefore,
not unlikely, that, residing in a wild and frontier
country, they may have, at one period or other, during
these commotions, refused allegiance to the feeble
monarch of the day, and thus extorted from him some
grant of territory or jurisdiction. It is also
certain, that, by a charter from James IV., dated
November 30, 1509, John Murray of Philiphaugh is vested
with the dignity of heritable sheriff of Ettrick Forest,
an office held by his descendants till the final abolition
of such jurisdictions by 28th George II. cap. 23.
But it seems difficult to believe that the circumstances,
mentioned in the ballad, could occur under the reign
of so vigorous a monarch as James IV. It is true,
that the Dramatis Personae introduced seem
to refer to the end of the fifteenth, or beginning
of the sixteenth, century; but from this it can only
be argued, that the author himself lived soon after
that period. It may, therefore, be supposed (unless
farther evidence can be produced, tending to invalidate
the conclusion), that the bard, willing to pay his
court to the family, has connected the grant of the
sheriffship by James IV. with some further dispute
betwixt the Murrays of Philiphaugh and their sovereign,
occurring, either while they were engaged upon the
side of Baliol, or in the subsequent reigns of David
II. and Robert II. and III., when the English possessed
great part of the Scottish frontier, and the rest
was in so lawless a state as hardly to acknowledge
any superior. At the same time, this reasoning
is not absolutely conclusive. James IV. had particular
reasons for desiring that Ettrick Forest, which actually
formed part of the jointure lands of Margaret, his
queen, should be kept in a state of tranquillity.—Rymer,
Vol. XIII. p. 66. In order to accomplish
this object, it was natural for him, according to the
policy of his predecessors to invest one great family
with the power of keeping order among the rest.
It is even probable, that the Philiphaugh family may
have had claims upon part of the lordship of Ettrick
Forest, which lay intermingled with their own extensive
possessions; and, in the course of arranging, not
indeed the feudal superiority, but the property, of
these lands, a dispute may have arisen, of sufficient
importance to be the ground-work of a ballad.—It
is farther probable, that the Murrays, like other
border clans, were in a very lawless state, and held
their lands merely by occupancy, without any feudal
right. Indeed, the lands of the various proprietors
in Ettrick Forest (being a royal demesne) were held
by the possessors, not in property, but as the kindly
tenants, or rentallers, of the crown; and it is only
about 150 years since they obtained charters, striking
the feu-duty of each proprietor, at the rate of the
quit-rent, which he formerly paid. This state
of possession naturally led to a confusion of rights
and claims. The kings of Scotland were often
reduced to the humiliating necessity of compromising
such matters with their rebellious subjects, and James
himself even entered into a sort of league with Johnie
Faa, the king of the gypsies.—Perhaps,
therefore, the tradition, handed down in this song,
may have had more foundation than it would at present
be proper positively to assert.
The merit of this beautiful old tale,
it is thought, will be fully acknowledged. It
has been, for ages, a popular song in Selkirkshire.
The scene is, by the common people, supposed to have
been the castle of Newark, upon Yarrow. This
is highly improbable, because Newark was always a
royal fortress. Indeed, the late excellent antiquarian
Mr. Plummer, sheriff-depute of Selkirkshire, has assured
the editor, that he remembered the insignia
of the unicorns, &c. so often mentioned in the ballad,
in existence upon the old tower at Hangingshaw, the
seat of the Philiphaugh family; although, upon first
perusing a copy of the ballad, he was inclined to
subscribe to the popular opinion. The tower of
Hangingshaw has been demolished for many years.
It stood in a romantic and solitary situation, on
the classical banks of the Yarrow. When the mountains
around Hangingshaw were covered with the wild copse
which constituted a Scottish forest, a more secure
strong-hold for an outlawed baron can hardly be imagined.
The tradition of Ettrick Forest bears,
that the Outlaw was a man of prodigious strength,
possessing a batton or club, with which he laid lee
(i.e. waste) the country for many miles round; and
that he was at length slain by Buccleuch, or some
of his clan, at a little mount, covered with fir-trees,
adjoining to Newark castle, and said to have been
a part of the garden. A varying tradition bears
the place of his death to have been near to the house
of the Duke of Buccleuch’s game-keeper, beneath
the castle; and, that the fatal arrow was shot by
Scot of Haining, from the ruins of a cottage on the
opposite side of the Yarrow. There was extant,
within these twenty years, some verses of a song on
his death. The feud betwixt the Outlaw and the
Scotts may serve to explain the asperity, with which
the chieftain of that clan is handled in the ballad.
In publishing the following ballad,
the copy principally resorted to is one, apparently
of considerable antiquity, which was found among the
papers of the late Mrs. Cockburn, of Edinburgh, a lady
whose memory will be long honoured by all who knew
her. Another copy, much more imperfect, is to
be found in Glenriddel’s MSS. The names
are in this last miserably mangled, as is always the
case when ballads are taken down from the recitation
of persons living at a distance from the scenes in
which they are laid. Mr. Plummer also gave the
editor a few additional verses, not contained in either
copy, which are thrown into what seemed their proper
place. There is yet another copy, in Mr. Herd’s
MSS., which has been occasionally made use of.
Two verses are restored in the present edition, from
the recitation of Mr. Mungo Park, whose toils, during
his patient and intrepid travels in Africa, have not
eradicated from his recollection the legendary lore
of his native country.
The arms of the Philiphaugh family
are said by tradition to allude to their outlawed
state. They are indeed those of a huntsman, and
are blazoned thus; Argent, a hunting horn sable, stringed
and garnished gules, on a chief azure, three stars
of the first. Crest, a Demi Forester, winding
his horn, proper. Motto, Hinc usque superna
venabor.
* * * *
*