The Hermit and the Wild Woman

AN apparition almost as startling had come to Garnett himself in the shape of the mauve note received from his concierge as he was leaving the hotel for luncheon.

Not that, on the face of it, a missive announcing Mrs. Sam Newell’s arrival at Ritz’s, and her need of his presence there that afternoon at five, carried any special mark of the portentous.  It was not her being at Ritz’s that surprised him.  The fact that she was chronically hard up, and had once or twice lately been so brutally confronted with the consequences as to accept—­indeed solicit—­a loan of five pounds from him:  this circumstance, as Garnett knew, would never be allowed to affect the general tenor of her existence.  If one came to Paris, where could one go but to Ritz’s?  Did he see her in some grubby hole across the river?  Or in a family pension near the Place de l’Etoile?  There was no affectation in her tendency to gravitate toward what was costliest and most conspicuous.  In doing so she obeyed one of the profoundest instincts of her nature, and it was another instinct which taught her to gratify the first at any cost, even to that of dipping into the pocket of an impecunious newspaper correspondent.  It was a part of her strength—­and of her charm too—­that she did such things naturally, openly, without any of the ugly grimaces of dissimulation or compunction.

Her recourse to Garnett had of course marked a specially low ebb in her fortunes.  Save in moments of exceptional dearth she had richer sources of supply; and he was nearly sure that, by running over the “society column” of the Paris Herald, he should find an explanation, not perhaps of her presence at Ritz’s, but of her means of subsistence there.  What really perplexed him was not the financial but the social aspect of the case.  When Mrs. Newell had left London in July she had told him that, between Cowes and Scotland, she and Hermy were provided for till the middle of October:  after that, as she put it, they would have to look about.  Why, then, when she had in her hand the opportunity of living for three months at the expense of the British aristocracy, did she rush off to Paris at heaven knew whose expense in the beginning of September?  She was not a woman to act incoherently; if she made mistakes they were not of that kind.  Garnett felt sure she would never willingly relax her hold on her distinguished friends—­was it possible that it was they who had somewhat violently let go of her?

As Garnett reviewed the situation he began to see that this possibility had for some time been latent in it.  He had felt that something might happen at any moment—­and was not this the something he had obscurely foreseen?  Mrs. Newell really moved too fast:  her position was as perilous as that of an invading army without a base of supplies.  She used up everything too quickly—­friends, credit, influence, forbearance.  It was so easy for her to acquire all these—­what a pity she had never learned to keep them!  He himself, for instance—­the most insignificant of her acquisitions—­was beginning to feel like a squeezed sponge at the mere thought of her; and it was this sense of exhaustion, of the inability to provide more, either materially or morally, which had provoked his exclamation on opening her note.  From the first days of their acquaintance her prodigality had amazed him, but he had believed it to be surpassed by the infinity of her resources.  If she exhausted old supplies she always found new ones to replace them.  When one set of people began to find her impossible, another was always beginning to find her indispensable.  Yes—­but there were limits—­there were only so many sets of people, at least in her social classification, and when she came to an end of them, what then?  Was this flight to Paris a sign that she had come to an end—­was she going to try Paris because London had failed her?  The time of year precluded such a conjecture.  Mrs. Newell’s Paris was non-existent in September.  The town was a desert of gaping trippers—­he could as soon think of her seeking social restoration at Margate.

For a moment it occurred to him that she might have to come over to replenish her wardrobe; but he knew her dates too well to dwell long on this hope.  It was in April and December that she visited the dress-makers:  before December, he had heard her explain, one got nothing but “the American fashions.”  Mrs. Newell’s scorn of all things American was somewhat illogically coupled with the determination to use her own Americanism to the utmost as a means of social advance.  She had found out long ago that, on certain lines, it paid in London to be American, and she had manufactured for herself a personality independent of geographical or social demarcations, and presenting that remarkable blend of plantation dialect, Bowery slang and hyperbolic statement, which is the British nobility’s favorite idea of an unadulterated Americanism.  Mrs. Newell, for all her talents, was not naturally either humorous or hyperbolic, and there were times when it would doubtless have been a relief to her to be as monumentally stolid as some of the persons whose dulness it was her fate to enliven.  It was perhaps the need of relaxing which had drawn her into her odd intimacy with Garnett, with whom she did not have to be either scrupulously English or artificially American, since the impression she made on him was of no more consequence than that which she produced on her footman.  Garnett was perfectly aware that he owed his success to his insignificance, but the fact affected him only as adding one more element to his knowledge of Mrs. Newell’s character.  He was as ready to sacrifice his personal vanity in such a cause as he had been, at the outset of their acquaintance, to sacrifice his professional pride to the opportunity of knowing her.

When he had accepted the position of “London correspondent” (with an occasional side-glance at Paris) to the New York Searchlight, he had not understood that his work was to include the obligation of “interviewing”; indeed, had the possibility presented itself in advance, he would have met it by unpacking his valise and returning to the drudgery of his assistant-editorship in New York.  But when, after three months in Europe, he received a letter from his chief, suggesting that he should enliven the Sunday Searchlight by a series of “Talks with Smart Americans in London” (beginning, say, with Mrs. Sam Newell), the change of focus already enabled him to view the proposal without passion.  For his life on the edge of the great world-caldron of art, politics and pleasure—­of that high-spiced brew which is nowhere else so subtly and variously compounded—­had bred in him an eager appetite to taste of the heady mixture.  He knew he should never have the full spoon at his lips, but he recalled the peasant-girl in one of Browning’s plays, who has once eaten polenta cut with a knife which has carved an ortolan.  Might not Mrs. Newell, who had so successfully cut a way into the dense and succulent mass of English society, serve as the knife to season his polenta?

He had expected, as the result of the interview, to which she promptly, almost eagerly, assented, no more than the glimpse of brightly lit vistas which a waiting messenger may catch through open doors; but instead he had found himself drawn at once into the inner sanctuary, not of London society, but of Mrs. Newell’s relation to it.  She had been candidly charmed by the idea of the interview:  it struck him that she was conscious of the need of being freshened up.  Her appearance was brilliantly fresh, with the inveterate freshness of the toilet-table; her paint was as impenetrable as armor.  But her personality was a little tarnished:  she was in want of social renovation.  She had been doing and saying the same things for too long a time.  London, Cowes, Homburg, Scotland, Monte Carlo—­that had been the round since Hermy was a baby.  Hermy was her daughter, Miss Hermione Newell, who was called in presently to be shown off to the interviewer and add a paragraph to the celebration of her mother’s charms.

Miss Newell’s appearance was so full of an unassisted freshness that for a moment Garnett made the mistake of fancying that she could fill a paragraph of her own.  But he soon found that her vague personality was merely tributary to her parent’s; that her youth and grace were, in some mysterious way, her mother’s rather than her own.  She smiled obediently on Garnett, but could contribute little beyond her smile and the general sweetness of her presence, to the picture of Mrs. Newell’s existence which it was the young man’s business to draw.  And presently he found that she had left the room without his noticing it.

He learned in time that this unnoticeableness was the most conspicuous thing about her.  Burning at best with a mild light, she became invisible in the glare of her mother’s personality.  It was in fact only as a product of her environment that poor Hermione struck the imagination.  With the smartest woman in London as her guide and example she had never developed a taste for dress, and with opportunities for enlightenment from which Garnett’s fancy recoiled she remained simple, unsuspicious and tender, with an inclination to good works and afternoon church, a taste for the society of dull girls, and a clinging fidelity to old governesses and retired nurse-maids.  Mrs. Newell, whose boast it was that she looked facts in the face, frankly owned that she had not been able to make anything of Hermione.  “If she has a role I haven’t discovered it,” she confessed to Garnett.  “I’ve tried everything, but she doesn’t fit in anywhere.”

Mrs. Newell spoke as if her daughter were a piece of furniture acquired without due reflection, and for which no suitable place could be found.  She got, of course, what she could out of Hermione, who wrote her notes, ran her errands, saw tiresome people for her, and occupied an intermediate office between that of lady’s maid and secretary; but such small returns on her investment were not what Mrs. Newell had counted on.  What was the use of producing and educating a handsome daughter if she did not, in some more positive way, contribute to her parent’s advancement?