WE are at the end of our enquiry,
but as often happens in the search after truth, if
we have answered one question, we have raised many
more; if we have followed one track home, we have had
to pass by others that opened off it and led, or seemed
to lead, to far other goals than the sacred grove
at Nemi. Some of these paths we have followed
a little way; others, if fortune should be kind, the
writer and the reader may one day pursue together.
For the present we have journeyed far enough together,
and it is time to part. Yet before we do so,
we may well ask ourselves whether there is not some
more general conclusion, some lesson, if possible,
of hope and encouragement, to be drawn from the melancholy
record of human error and folly which has engaged
our attention in this book.
If then we consider, on the one hand,
the essential similarity of man’s chief wants
everywhere and at all times, and on the other hand,
the wide difference between the means he has adopted
to satisfy them in different ages, we shall perhaps
be disposed to conclude that the movement of the higher
thought, so far as we can trace it, has on the whole
been from magic through religion to science.
In magic man depends on his own strength to meet the
difficulties and dangers that beset him on every side.
He believes in a certain established order of nature
on which he can surely count, and which he can manipulate
for his own ends. When he discovers his mistake,
when he recognises sadly that both the order of nature
which he had assumed and the control which he had believed
himself to exercise over it were purely imaginary,
he ceases to rely on his own intelligence and his
own unaided efforts, and throws himself humbly on
the mercy of certain great invisible beings behind
the veil of nature, to whom he now ascribes all those
far-reaching powers which he once arrogated to himself.
Thus in the acuter minds magic is gradually superseded
by religion, which explains the succession of natural
phenomena as regulated by the will, the passion, or
the caprice of spiritual beings like man in kind, though
vastly superior to him in power.
But as time goes on this explanation
in its turn proves to be unsatisfactory. For
it assumes that the succession of natural events is
not determined by immutable laws, but is to some extent
variable and irregular, and this assumption is not
borne out by closer observation. On the contrary,
the more we scrutinise that succession the more we
are struck by the rigid uniformity, the punctual precision
with which, wherever we can follow them, the operations
of nature are carried on. Every great advance
in knowledge has extended the sphere of order and
correspondingly restricted the sphere of apparent
disorder in the world, till now we are ready to anticipate
that even in regions where chance and confusion appear
still to reign, a fuller knowledge would everywhere
reduce the seeming chaos to cosmos. Thus the
keener minds, still pressing forward to a deeper solution
of the mysteries of the universe, come to reject the
religious theory of nature as inadequate, and to revert
in a measure to the older standpoint of magic by postulating
explicitly, what in magic had only been implicitly
assumed, to wit, an inflexible regularity in the order
of natural events, which, if carefully observed, enables
us to foresee their course with certainty and to act
accordingly. In short, religion, regarded as an
explanation of nature, is displaced by science.
But while science has this much in
common with magic that both rest on a faith in order
as the underlying principle of all things, readers
of this work will hardly need to be reminded that the
order presupposed by magic differs widely from that
which forms the basis of science. The difference
flows naturally from the different modes in which
the two orders have been reached. For whereas
the order on which magic reckons is merely an extension,
by false analogy, of the order in which ideas present
themselves to our minds, the order laid down by science
is derived from patient and exact observation of the
phenomena themselves. The abundance, the solidity,
and the splendour of the results already achieved
by science are well fitted to inspire us with a cheerful
confidence in the soundness of its method. Here
at last, after groping about in the dark for countless
ages, man has hit upon a clue to the labyrinth, a golden
key that opens many locks in the treasury of nature.
It is probably not too much to say that the hope of
progress—moral and intellectual as well
as material—in the future is bound up with
the fortunes of science, and that every obstacle placed
in the way of scientific discovery is a wrong to humanity.
Yet the history of thought should
warn us against concluding that because the scientific
theory of the world is the best that has yet been
formulated, it is necessarily complete and final.
We must remember that at bottom the generalisations
of science or, in common parlance, the laws of nature
are merely hypotheses devised to explain that ever-shifting
phantasmagoria of thought which we dignify with the
high-sounding names of the world and the universe.
In the last analysis magic, religion, and science are
nothing but theories of thought; and as science has
supplanted its predecessors, so it may hereafter be
itself superseded by some more perfect hypothesis,
perhaps by some totally different way of looking at
the phenomena—of registering the shadows
on the screen—of which we in this generation
can form no idea. The advance of knowledge is
an infinite progression towards a goal that for ever
recedes. We need not murmur at the endless pursuit:
Fatti non foste a viver come
bruti
Ma per seguir virtute e conoscenza.
Great things will come of that pursuit,
though we may not enjoy them. Brighter stars
will rise on some voyager of the future—some
great Ulysses of the realms of thought—than
shine on us. The dreams of magic may one day
be the waking realities of science. But a dark
shadow lies athwart the far end of this fair prospect.
For however vast the increase of knowledge and of
power which the future may have in store for man,
he can scarcely hope to stay the sweep of those great
forces which seem to be making silently but relentlessly
for the destruction of all this starry universe in
which our earth swims as a speck or mote. In
the ages to come man may be able to predict, perhaps
even to control, the wayward courses of the winds
and clouds, but hardly will his puny hands have strength
to speed afresh our slackening planet in its orbit
or rekindle the dying fire of the sun. Yet the
philosopher who trembles at the idea of such distant
catastrophes may console himself by reflecting that
these gloomy apprehensions, like the earth and the
sun themselves, are only parts of that unsubstantial
world which thought has conjured up out of the void,
and that the phantoms which the subtle enchantress
has evoked to-day she may ban to-morrow. They
too, like so much that to common eyes seems solid,
may melt into air, into thin air.
Without dipping so far into the future,
we may illustrate the course which thought has hitherto
run by likening it to a web woven of three different
threads—the black thread of magic, the red
thread of religion, and the white thread of science,
if under science we may include those simple truths,
drawn from observation of nature, of which men in
all ages have possessed a store. Could we then
survey the web of thought from the beginning, we should
probably perceive it to be at first a chequer of black
and white, a patchwork of true and false notions,
hardly tinged as yet by the red thread of religion.
But carry your eye farther along the fabric and you
will remark that, while the black and white chequer
still runs through it, there rests on the middle portion
of the web, where religion has entered most deeply
into its texture, a dark crimson stain, which shades
off insensibly into a lighter tint as the white thread
of science is woven more and more into the tissue.
To a web thus chequered and stained, thus shot with
threads of diverse hues, but gradually changing colour
the farther it is unrolled, the state of modern thought,
with all its divergent aims and conflicting tendencies,
may be compared. Will the great movement which
for centuries has been slowly altering the complexion
of thought be continued in the near future? or will
a reaction set in which may arrest progress and even
undo much that has been done? To keep up our
parable, what will be the colour of the web which the
Fates are now weaving on the humming loom of time?
will it be white or red? We cannot tell.
A faint glimmering light illumines the backward portion
of the web. Clouds and thick darkness hide the
other end.
Our long voyage of discovery is over
and our bark has drooped her weary sails in port at
last. Once more we take the road to Nemi.
It is evening, and as we climb the long slope of the
Appian Way up to the Alban Hills, we look back and
see the sky aflame with sunset, its golden glory resting
like the aureole of a dying saint over Rome and touching
with a crest of fire the dome of St. Peter’s.
The sight once seen can never be forgotten, but we
turn from it and pursue our way darkling along the
mountain side, till we come to Nemi and look down
on the lake in its deep hollow, now fast disappearing
in the evening shadows. The place has changed
but little since Diana received the homage of her
worshippers in the sacred grove. The temple of
the sylvan goddess, indeed, has vanished and the King
of the Wood no longer stands sentinel over the Golden
Bough. But Nemi’s woods are still green,
and as the sunset fades above them in the west, there
comes to us, borne on the swell of the wind, the sound
of the church bells of Aricia ringing the Angelus.
Ave Maria! Sweet and solemn they chime out
from the distant town and die lingeringly away across
the wide Campagnan marshes. Le roi est mort, vive
le roi! Ave Maria!