THE ISLAND of Cyprus lies but one
day’s sail from the coast of Syria. Indeed,
on fine summer evenings its mountains may be descried
looming low and dark against the red fires of sunset.
With its rich mines of copper and its forests of firs
and stately cedars, the island naturally attracted
a commercial and maritime people like the Phoenicians;
while the abundance of its corn, its wine, and its
oil must have rendered it in their eyes a Land of
Promise by comparison with the niggardly nature of
their own rugged coast, hemmed in between the mountains
and the sea. Accordingly they settled in Cyprus
at a very early date and remained there long after
the Greeks had also established themselves on its
shores; for we know from inscriptions and coins that
Phoenician kings reigned at Citium, the Chittim of
the Hebrews, down to the time of Alexander the Great.
Naturally the Semitic colonists brought their gods
with them from the mother-land. They worshipped
Baal of the Lebanon, who may well have been Adonis,
and at Amathus on the south coast they instituted
the rites of Adonis and Aphrodite, or rather Astarte.
Here, as at Byblus, these rites resembled the Egyptian
worship of Osiris so closely that some people even
identified the Adonis of Amathus with Osiris.
But the great seat of the worship
of Aphrodite and Adonis in Cyprus was Paphos on the
south-western side of the island. Among the petty
kingdoms into which Cyprus was divided from the earliest
times until the end of the fourth century before our
era Paphos must have ranked with the best. It
is a land of hills and billowy ridges, diversified
by fields and vineyards and intersected by rivers,
which in the course of ages have carved for themselves
beds of such tremendous depth that travelling in the
interior is difficult and tedious. The lofty
range of Mount Olympus (the modern Troodos), capped
with snow the greater part of the year, screens Paphos
from the northerly and easterly winds and cuts it
off from the rest of the island. On the slopes
of the range the last pine-woods of Cyprus linger,
sheltering here and there monasteries in scenery not
unworthy of the Apennines. The old city of Paphos
occupied the summit of a hill about a mile from the
sea; the newer city sprang up at the harbour some ten
miles off. The sanctuary of Aphrodite at Old
Paphos (the modern Kuklia) was one of the most celebrated
shrines in the ancient world. According to Herodotus,
it was founded by Phoenician colonists from Ascalon;
but it is possible that a native goddess of fertility
was worshipped on the spot before the arrival of the
Phoenicians, and that the newcomers identified her
with their own Baalath or Astarte, whom she may have
closely resembled. If two deities were thus fused
in one, we may suppose that they were both varieties
of that great goddess of motherhood and fertility
whose worship appears to have been spread all over
Western Asia from a very early time. The supposition
is confirmed as well by the archaic shape of her image
as by the licentious character of her rites; for both
that shape and those rites were shared by her with
other Asiatic deities. Her image was simply a
white cone or pyramid. In like manner, a cone
was the emblem of Astarte at Byblus, of the native
goddess whom the Greeks called Artemis at Perga in
Pamphylia, and of the sun-god Heliogabalus at Emesa
in Syria. Conical stones, which apparently served
as idols, have also been found at Golgi in Cyprus,
and in the Phoenician temples of Malta; and cones
of sandstone came to light at the shrine of the “Mistress
of Torquoise” among the barren hills and frowning
precipices of Sinai.
In Cyprus it appears that before marriage
all women were formerly obliged by custom to prostitute
themselves to strangers at the sanctuary of the goddess,
whether she went by the name of Aphrodite, Astarte,
or what not. Similar customs prevailed in many
parts of Western Asia. Whatever its motive, the
practice was clearly regarded, not as an orgy of lust,
but as a solemn religious duty performed in the service
of that great Mother Goddess of Western Asia whose
name varied, while her type remained constant, from
place to place. Thus at Babylon every woman,
whether rich or poor, had once in her life to submit
to the embraces of a stranger at the temple of Mylitta,
that is, of Ishtar or Astarte, and to dedicate to
the goddess the wages earned by this sanctified harlotry.
The sacred precinct was crowded with women waiting
to observe the custom. Some of them had to wait
there for years. At Heliopolis or Baalbec in
Syria, famous for the imposing grandeur of its ruined
temples, the custom of the country required that every
maiden should prostitute herself to a stranger at
the temple of Astarte, and matrons as well as maids
testified their devotion to the goddess in the same
manner. The emperor Constantine abolished the
custom, destroyed the temple, and built a church in
its stead. In Phoenician temples women prostituted
themselves for hire in the service of religion, believing
that by this conduct they propitiated the goddess and
won her favour. “It was a law of the Amorites,
that she who was about to marry should sit in fornication
seven days by the gate.” At Byblus the
people shaved their heads in the annual mourning for
Adonis. Women who refused to sacrifice their
hair had to give themselves up to strangers on a certain
day of the festival, and the money which they thus
earned was devoted to the goddess. A Greek inscription
found at Tralles in Lydia proves that the practice
of religious prostitution survived in that country
as late as the second century of our era. It
records of a certain woman, Aurelia Aemilia by name,
not only that she herself served the god in the capacity
of a harlot at his express command, but that her mother
and other female ancestors had done the same before
her; and the publicity of the record, engraved on
a marble column which supported a votive offering,
shows that no stain attached to such a life and such
a parentage. In Armenia the noblest families
dedicated their daughters to the service of the goddess
Anaitis in her temple of Acilisena, where the damsels
acted as prostitutes for a long time before they were
given in marriage. Nobody scrupled to take one
of these girls to wife when her period of service
was over. Again, the goddess Ma was served by
a multitude of sacred harlots at Comana in Pontus,
and crowds of men and women flocked to her sanctuary
from the neighbouring cities and country to attend
the biennial festivals or to pay their vows to the
goddess.
If we survey the whole of the evidence
on this subject, some of which has still to be laid
before the reader, we may conclude that a great Mother
Goddess, the personification of all the reproductive
energies of nature, was worshipped under different
names but with a substantial similarity of myth and
ritual by many peoples of Western Asia; that associated
with her was a lover, or rather series of lovers,
divine yet mortal, with whom she mated year by year,
their commerce being deemed essential to the propagation
of animals and plants, each in their several kind;
and further, that the fabulous union of the divine
pair was simulated and, as it were, multiplied on
earth by the real, though temporary, union of the human
sexes at the sanctuary of the goddess for the sake
of thereby ensuring the fruitfulness of the ground
and the increase of man and beast.
At Paphos the custom of religious
prostitution is said to have been instituted by King
Cinyras, and to have been practised by his daughters,
the sisters of Adonis, who, having incurred the wrath
of Aphrodite, mated with strangers and ended their
days in Egypt. In this form of the tradition
the wrath of Aphrodite is probably a feature added
by a later authority, who could only regard conduct
which shocked his own moral sense as a punishment inflicted
by the goddess instead of as a sacrifice regularly
enjoined by her on all her devotees. At all events
the story indicates that the princesses of Paphos
had to conform to the custom as well as women of humble
birth.
Among the stories which were told
of Cinyras, the ancestor of the priestly kings of
Paphos and the father of Adonis, there are some that
deserve our attention. In the first place, he
is said to have begotten his son Adonis in incestuous
intercourse with his daughter Myrrha at a festival
of the corn-goddess, at which women robed in white
were wont to offer corn-wreaths as first-fruits of
the harvest and to observe strict chastity for nine
days. Similar cases of incest with a daughter
are reported of many ancient kings. It seems
unlikely that such reports are without foundation,
and perhaps equally improbable that they refer to
mere fortuitous outbursts of unnatural lust.
We may suspect that they are based on a practice actually
observed for a definite reason in certain special
circumstances. Now in countries where the royal
blood was traced through women only, and where consequently
the king held office merely in virtue of his marriage
with an hereditary princess, who was the real sovereign,
it appears to have often happened that a prince married
his own sister, the princess royal, in order to obtain
with her hand the crown which otherwise would have
gone to another man, perhaps to a stranger. May
not the same rule of descent have furnished a motive
for incest with a daughter? For it seems a natural
corollary from such a rule that the king was bound
to vacate the throne on the death of his wife, the
queen, since he occupied it only by virtue of his
marriage with her. When that marriage terminated,
his right to the throne terminated with it and passed
at once to his daughter’s husband. Hence
if the king desired to reign after his wife’s
death, the only way in which he could legitimately
continue to do so was by marrying his daughter, and
thus prolonging through her the title which had formerly
been his through her mother.
Cinyras is said to have been famed
for his exquisite beauty and to have been wooed by
Aphrodite herself. Thus it would appear, as scholars
have already observed, that Cinyras was in a sense
a duplicate of his handsome son Adonis, to whom the
inflammable goddess also lost her heart. Further,
these stories of the love of Aphrodite for two members
of the royal house of Paphos can hardly be dissociated
from the corresponding legend told of Pygmalion, a
Phoenician king of Cyprus, who is said to have fallen
in love with an image of Aphrodite and taken it to
his bed. When we consider that Pygmalion was
the father-in-law of Cinyras, that the son of Cinyras
was Adonis, and that all three, in successive generations,
are said to have been concerned in a love-intrigue
with Aphrodite, we can hardly help concluding that
the early Phoenician kings of Paphos, or their sons,
regularly claimed to be not merely the priests of the
goddess but also her lovers, in other words, that in
their official capacity they personated Adonis.
At all events Adonis is said to have reigned in Cyprus,
and it appears to be certain that the title of Adonis
was regularly borne by the sons of all the Phoenician
kings of the island. It is true that the title
strictly signified no more than “lord”;
yet the legends which connect these Cyprian princes
with the goddess of love make it probable that they
claimed the divine nature as well as the human dignity
of Adonis. The story of Pygmalion points to a
ceremony of a sacred marriage in which the king wedded
the image of Aphrodite, or rather of Astarte.
If that was so, the tale was in a sense true, not
of a single man only, but of a whole series of men,
and it would be all the more likely to be told of
Pygmalion, if that was a common name of Semitic kings
in general, and of Cyprian kings in particular.
Pygmalion, at all events, is known as the name of
the king of Tyre from whom his sister Dido fled; and
a king of Citium and Idalium in Cyprus, who reigned
in the time of Alexander the Great, was also called
Pygmalion, or rather Pumiyathon, the Phoenician name
which the Greeks corrupted into Pygmalion. Further,
it deserves to be noted that the names Pygmalion and
Astarte occur together in a Punic inscription on a
gold medallion which was found in a grave at Carthage;
the characters of the inscription are of the earliest
type. As the custom of religious prostitution
at Paphos is said to have been founded by king Cinyras
and observed by his daughters, we may surmise that
the kings of Paphos played the part of the divine
bridegroom in a less innocent rite than the form of
marriage with a statue; in fact, that at certain festivals
each of them had to mate with one or more of the sacred
harlots of the temple, who played Astarte to his Adonis.
If that was so, there is more truth than has commonly
been supposed in the reproach cast by the Christian
fathers that the Aphrodite worshipped by Cinyras was
a common whore. The fruit of their union would
rank as sons and daughters of the deity, and would
in time become the parents of gods and goddesses, like
their fathers and mothers before them. In this
manner Paphos, and perhaps all sanctuaries of the
great Asiatic goddess where sacred prostitution was
practised, might be well stocked with human deities,
the offspring of the divine king by his wives, concubines,
and temple harlots. Any one of these might probably
succeed his father on the throne or be sacrificed
in his stead whenever stress of war or other grave
junctures called, as they sometimes did, for the death
of a royal victim. Such a tax, levied occasionally
on the king’s numerous progeny for the good
of the country, would neither extinguish the divine
stock nor break the father’s heart, who divided
his paternal affection among so many. At all events,
if, as there seems reason to believe, Semitic kings
were often regarded at the same time as hereditary
deities, it is easy to understand the frequency of
Semitic personal names which imply that the bearers
of them were the sons or daughters, the brothers or
sisters, the fathers or mothers of a god, and we need
not resort to the shifts employed by some scholars
to evade the plain sense of the words. This interpretation
is confirmed by a parallel Egyptian usage; for in
Egypt, where the kings were worshipped as divine, the
queen was called “the wife of the god”
or “the mother of the god,” and the title
“father of the god” was borne not only
by the king’s real father but also by his father-in-law.
Similarly, perhaps, among the Semites any man who
sent his daughter to swell the royal harem may have
been allowed to call himself “the father of the
god.”
If we may judge by his name, the Semitic
king who bore the name of Cinyras was, like King David,
a harper; for the name of Cinyras is clearly connected
with the Greek cinyra, “a lyre,”
which in its turn comes from the Semitic kinnor,
“a lyre,” the very word applied to the
instrument on which David played before Saul.
We shall probably not err in assuming that at Paphos
as at Jerusalem the music of the lyre or harp was
not a mere pastime designed to while away an idle
hour, but formed part of the service of religion,
the moving influence of its melodies being perhaps
set down, like the effect of wine, to the direct inspiration
of a deity. Certainly at Jerusalem the regular
clergy of the temple prophesied to the music of harps,
of psalteries, and of cymbals; and it appears that
the irregular clergy also, as we may call the prophets,
depended on some such stimulus for inducing the ecstatic
state which they took for immediate converse with
the divinity. Thus we read of a band of prophets
coming down from a high place with a psaltery, a timbrel,
a pipe, and a harp before them, and prophesying as
they went. Again, when the united forces of Judah
and Ephraim were traversing the wilderness of Moab
in pursuit of the enemy, they could find no water
for three days, and were like to die of thirst, they
and the beasts of burden. In this emergency the
prophet Elisha, who was with the army, called for
a minstrel and bade him play. Under the influence
of the music he ordered the soldiers to dig trenches
in the sandy bed of the waterless waddy through which
lay the line of march. They did so, and next
morning the trenches were full of the water that had
drained down into them underground from the desolate,
forbidding mountains on either hand. The prophet’s
success in striking water in the wilderness resembles
the reported success of modern dowsers, though his
mode of procedure was different. Incidentally
he rendered another service to his countrymen.
For the skulking Moabites from their lairs among the
rocks saw the red sun of the desert reflected in the
water, and taking it for the blood, or perhaps rather
for an omen of the blood, of their enemies, they plucked
up heart to attack the camp and were defeated with
great slaughter.
Again, just as the cloud of melancholy
which from time to time darkened the moody mind of
Saul was viewed as an evil spirit from the Lord vexing
him, so on the other hand the solemn strains of the
harp, which soothed and composed his troubled thoughts,
may well have seemed to the hag-ridden king the very
voice of God or of his good angel whispering peace.
Even in our own day a great religious writer, himself
deeply sensitive to the witchery of music, has said
that musical notes, with all their power to fire the
blood and melt the heart, cannot be mere empty sounds
and nothing more; no, they have escaped from some
higher sphere, they are outpourings of eternal harmony,
the voice of angels, the Magnificat of saints.
It is thus that the rude imaginings of primitive man
are transfigured and his feeble lispings echoed with
a rolling reverberation in the musical prose of Newman.
Indeed the influence of music on the development of
religion is a subject which would repay a sympathetic
study. For we cannot doubt that this, the most
intimate and affecting of all the arts, has done much
to create as well as to express the religious emotions,
thus modifying more or less deeply the fabric of belief
to which at first sight it seems only to minister.
The musician has done his part as well as the prophet
and the thinker in the making of religion. Every
faith has its appropriate music, and the difference
between the creeds might almost be expressed in musical
notation. The interval, for example, which divides
the wild revels of Cybele from the stately ritual of
the Catholic Church is measured by the gulf which severs
the dissonant clash of cymbals and tambourines from
the grave harmonies of Palestrina and Handel.
A different spirit breathes in the difference of the
music.