1. Tree-spirits
IN THE RELIGIOUS history of the Aryan
race in Europe the worship of trees has played an
important part. Nothing could be more natural.
For at the dawn of history Europe was covered with
immense primaeval forests, in which the scattered
clearings must have appeared like islets in an ocean
of green. Down to the first century before our
era the Hercynian forest stretched eastward from the
Rhine for a distance at once vast and unknown; Germans
whom Caesar questioned had travelled for two months
through it without reaching the end. Four centuries
later it was visited by the Emperor Julian, and the
solitude, the gloom, the silence of the forest appear
to have made a deep impression on his sensitive nature.
He declared that he knew nothing like it in the Roman
empire. In our own country the wealds of Kent,
Surrey, and Sussex are remnants of the great forest
of Anderida, which once clothed the whole of the south-eastern
portion of the island. Westward it seems to have
stretched till it joined another forest that extended
from Hampshire to Devon. In the reign of Henry
II. the citizens of London still hunted the wild bull
and the boar in the woods of Hampstead. Even
under the later Plantagenets the royal forests were
sixty-eight in number. In the forest of Arden
it was said that down to modern times a squirrel might
leap from tree to tree for nearly the whole length
of Warwickshire. The excavation of ancient pile-villages
in the valley of the Po has shown that long before
the rise and probably the foundation of Rome the north
of Italy was covered with dense woods of elms, chestnuts,
and especially of oaks. Archaeology is here confirmed
by history; for classical writers contain many references
to Italian forests which have now disappeared.
As late as the fourth century before our era Rome
was divided from central Etruria by the dreaded Ciminian
forest, which Livy compares to the woods of Germany.
No merchant, if we may trust the Roman historian, had
ever penetrated its pathless solitudes; and it was
deemed a most daring feat when a Roman general, after
sending two scouts to explore its intricacies, led
his army into the forest and, making his way to a
ridge of the wooded mountains, looked down on the rich
Etrurian fields spread out below. In Greece beautiful
woods of pine, oak, and other trees still linger on
the slopes of the high Arcadian mountains, still adorn
with their verdure the deep gorge through which the
Ladon hurries to join the sacred Alpheus, and were
still, down to a few years ago, mirrored in the dark
blue waters of the lonely lake of Pheneus; but they
are mere fragments of the forests which clothed great
tracts in antiquity, and which at a more remote epoch
may have spanned the Greek peninsula from sea to sea.
From an examination of the Teutonic
words for “temple” Grimm has made it probable
that amongst the Germans the oldest sanctuaries were
natural woods. However that may be, tree-worship
is well attested for all the great European families
of the Aryan stock. Amongst the Celts the oak-worship
of the Druids is familiar to every one, and their
old word for sanctuary seems to be identical in origin
and meaning with the Latin nemus, a grove or
woodland glade, which still survives in the name of
Nemi. Sacred groves were common among the ancient
Germans, and tree-worship is hardly extinct amongst
their descendants at the present day. How serious
that worship was in former times may be gathered from
the ferocious penalty appointed by the old German
laws for such as dared to peel the bark of a standing
tree. The culprit’s navel was to be cut
out and nailed to the part of the tree which he had
peeled, and he was to be driven round and round the
tree till all his guts were wound about its trunk.
The intention of the punishment clearly was to replace
the dead bark by a living substitute taken from the
culprit; it was a life for a life, the life of a man
for the life of a tree. At Upsala, the old religious
capital of Sweden, there was a sacred grove in which
every tree was regarded as divine. The heathen
Slavs worshipped trees and groves. The Lithuanians
were not converted to Christianity till towards the
close of the fourteenth century, and amongst them
at the date of their conversion the worship of trees
was prominent. Some of them revered remarkable
oaks and other great shady trees, from which they
received oracular responses. Some maintained
holy groves about their villages or houses, where even
to break a twig would have been a sin. They thought
that he who cut a bough in such a grove either died
suddenly or was crippled in one of his limbs.
Proofs of the prevalence of tree-worship in ancient
Greece and Italy are abundant. In the sanctuary
of Aesculapius at Cos, for example, it was forbidden
to cut down the cypress-trees under a penalty of a
thousand drachms. But nowhere, perhaps, in the
ancient world was this antique form of religion better
preserved than in the heart of the great metropolis
itself. In the Forum, the busy centre of Roman
life, the sacred fig-tree of Romulus was worshipped
down to the days of the empire, and the withering of
its trunk was enough to spread consternation through
the city. Again, on the slope of the Palatine
Hill grew a cornel-tree which was esteemed one of
the most sacred objects in Rome. Whenever the
tree appeared to a passer-by to be drooping, he set
up a hue and cry which was echoed by the people in
the street, and soon a crowd might be seen running
helter-skelter from all sides with buckets of water,
as if (says Plutarch) they were hastening to put out
a fire.
Among the tribes of the Finnish-Ugrian
stock in Europe the heathen worship was performed
for the most part in sacred groves, which were always
enclosed with a fence. Such a grove often consisted
merely of a glade or clearing with a few trees dotted
about, upon which in former times the skins of the
sacrificial victims were hung. The central point
of the grove, at least among the tribes of the Volga,
was the sacred tree, beside which everything else sank
into insignificance. Before it the worshippers
assembled and the priest offered his prayers, at its
roots the victim was sacrificed, and its boughs sometimes
served as a pulpit. No wood might be hewn and
no branch broken in the grove, and women were generally
forbidden to enter it.
But it is necessary to examine in
some detail the notions on which the worship of trees
and plants is based. To the savage the world in
general is animate, and trees and plants are no exception
to the rule. He thinks that they have souls like
his own, and he treats them accordingly. “They
say,” writes the ancient vegetarian Porphyry,
“that primitive men led an unhappy life, for
their superstition did not stop at animals but extended
even to plants. For why should the slaughter
of an ox or a sheep be a greater wrong than the felling
of a fir or an oak, seeing that a soul is implanted
in these trees also?” Similarly, the Hidatsa
Indians of North America believe that every natural
object has its spirit, or to speak more properly,
its shade. To these shades some consideration
or respect is due, but not equally to all. For
example, the shade of the cottonwood, the greatest
tree in the valley of the Upper Missouri, is supposed
to possess an intelligence which, if properly approached,
may help the Indians in certain undertakings; but the
shades of shrubs and grasses are of little account.
When the Missouri, swollen by a freshet in spring,
carries away part of its banks and sweeps some tall
tree into its current, it is said that the spirit
of the tree cries, while the roots still cling to the
land and until the trunk falls with a splash into the
stream. Formerly the Indians considered it wrong
to fell one of these giants, and when large logs were
needed they made use only of trees which had fallen
of themselves. Till lately some of the more credulous
old men declared that many of the misfortunes of their
people were caused by this modern disregard for the
rights of the living cottonwood. The Iroquois
believed that each species of tree, shrub, plant,
and herb had its own spirit, and to these spirits it
was their custom to return thanks. The Wanika
of Eastern Africa fancy that every tree, and especially
every coco-nut tree, has its spirit; “the destruction
of a cocoa-nut tree is regarded as equivalent to matricide,
because that tree gives them life and nourishment,
as a mother does her child.” Siamese monks,
believing that there are souls everywhere, and that
to destroy anything whatever is forcibly to dispossess
a soul, will not break a branch of a tree, “as
they will not break the arm of an innocent person.”
These monks, of course, are Buddhists. But Buddhist
animism is not a philosophical theory. It is
simply a common savage dogma incorporated in the system
of an historical religion. To suppose, with Benfey
and others, that the theories of animism and transmigration
current among rude peoples of Asia are derived from
Buddhism, is to reverse the facts.
Sometimes it is only particular sorts
of trees that are supposed to be tenanted by spirits.
At Grbalj in Dalmatia it is said that among great
beeches, oaks, and other trees there are some that
are endowed with shades or souls, and whoever fells
one of them must die on the spot, or at least live
an invalid for the rest of his days. If a woodman
fears that a tree which he has felled is one of this
sort, he must cut off the head of a live hen on the
stump of the tree with the very same axe with which
he cut down the tree. This will protect him from
all harm, even if the tree be one of the animated kind.
The silk-cotton trees, which rear their enormous trunks
to a stupendous height, far out-topping all the other
trees of the forest, are regarded with reverence throughout
West Africa, from the Senegal to the Niger, and are
believed to be the abode of a god or spirit.
Among the Ewespeaking peoples of the Slave Coast the
indwelling god of this giant of the forest goes by
the name of Huntin. Trees in which he specially
dwells—for it is not every silk-cotton tree
that he thus honours—are surrounded by
a girdle of palm-leaves; and sacrifices of fowls,
and occasionally of human beings, are fastened to
the trunk or laid against the foot of the tree.
A tree distinguished by a girdle of palm-leaves may
not be cut down or injured in any way; and even silk-cotton
trees which are not supposed to be animated by Huntin
may not be felled unless the woodman first offers
a sacrifice of fowls and palm-oil to purge himself
of the proposed sacrilege. To omit the sacrifice
is an offence which may be punished with death.
Among the Kangra mountains of the Punjaub a girl used
to be annually sacrificed to an old cedar-tree, the
families of the village taking it in turn to supply
the victim. The tree was cut down not very many
years ago.
If trees are animate, they are necessarily
sensitive and the cutting of them down becomes a delicate
surgical operation, which must be performed with as
tender a regard as possible for the feelings of the
sufferers, who otherwise may turn and rend the careless
or bungling operator. When an oak is being felled
“it gives a kind of shriekes or groanes, that
may be heard a mile off, as if it were the genius
of the oake lamenting. E. Wyld, Esq., hath heard
it severall times.” The Ojebways “very
seldom cut down green or living trees, from the idea
that it puts them to pain, and some of their medicine-men
profess to have heard the wailing of the trees under
the axe.” Trees that bleed and utter cries
of pain or indignation when they are hacked or burned
occur very often in Chinese books, even in Standard
Histories. Old peasants in some parts of Austria
still believe that forest-trees are animate, and will
not allow an incision to be made in the bark without
special cause; they have heard from their fathers
that the tree feels the cut not less than a wounded
man his hurt. In felling a tree they beg its pardon.
It is said that in the Upper Palatinate also old woodmen
still secretly ask a fine, sound tree to forgive them
before they cut it down. So in Jarkino the woodman
craves pardon of the tree he fells. Before the
Ilocanes of Luzon cut down trees in the virgin forest
or on the mountains, they recite some verses to the
following effect: “Be not uneasy, my friend,
though we fell what we have been ordered to fell.”
This they do in order not to draw down on themselves
the hatred of the spirits who live in the trees, and
who are apt to avenge themselves by visiting with
grievous sickness such as injure them wantonly.
The Basoga of Central Africa think that, when a tree
is cut down, the angry spirit which inhabits it may
cause the death of the chief and his family.
To prevent this disaster they consult a medicine-man
before they fell a tree. If the man of skill gives
leave to proceed, the woodman first offers a fowl and
a goat to the tree; then as soon as he has given the
first blow with the axe, he applies his mouth to the
cut and sucks some of the sap. In this way he
forms a brotherhood with the tree, just as two men
become blood-brothers by sucking each other’s
blood. After that he can cut down his tree-brother
with impunity.
But the spirits of vegetation are
not always treated with deference and respect.
If fair words and kind treatment do not move them,
stronger measures are sometimes resorted to. The
durian-tree of the East Indies, whose smooth stem
often shoots up to a height of eighty or ninety feet
without sending out a branch, bears a fruit of the
most delicious flavour and the most disgusting stench.
The Malays cultivate the tree for the sake of its
fruit, and have been known to resort to a peculiar
ceremony for the purpose of stimulating its fertility.
Near Jugra in Selangor there is a small grove of durian-trees,
and on a specially chosen day the villagers used to
assemble in it. Thereupon one of the local sorcerers
would take a hatchet and deliver several shrewd blows
on the trunk of the most barren of the trees, saying,
“Will you now bear fruit or not? If you
do not, I shall fell you.” To this the tree
replied through the mouth of another man who had climbed
a mangostin-tree hard by (the durian-tree being unclimbable),
“Yes, I will now bear fruit; I beg of you not
to fell me.” So in Japan to make trees bear
fruit two men go into an orchard. One of them
climbs up a tree and the other stands at the foot
with an axe. The man with the axe asks the tree
whether it will yield a good crop next year and threatens
to cut it down if it does not. To this the man
among the branches replies on behalf of the tree that
it will bear abundantly. Odd as this mode of
horticulture may seem to us, it has its exact parallels
in Europe. On Christmas Eve many a South Slavonian
and Bulgarian peasant swings an axe threateningly
against a barren fruit-tree, while another man standing
by intercedes for the menaced tree, saying, “Do
not cut it down; it will soon bear fruit.”
Thrice the axe is swung, and thrice the impending
blow is arrested at the entreaty of the intercessor.
After that the frightened tree will certainly bear
fruit next year.
The conception of trees and plants
as animated beings naturally results in treating them
as male and female, who can be married to each other
in a real, and not merely a figurative or poetical,
sense of the word. The notion is not purely fanciful,
for plants like animals have their sexes and reproduce
their kind by the union of the male and female elements.
But whereas in all the higher animals the organs of
the two sexes are regularly separated between different
individuals, in most plants they exist together in
every individual of the species. This rule, however,
is by no means universal, and in many species the
male plant is distinct from the female. The distinction
appears to have been observed by some savages, for
we are told that the Maoris “are acquainted with
the sex of trees, etc., and have distinct names
for the male and female of some trees.”
The ancients knew the difference between the male
and the female date-palm, and fertilised them artificially
by shaking the pollen of the male tree over the flowers
of the female. The fertilisation took place in
spring. Among the heathen of Harran the month
during which the palms were fertilised bore the name
of the Date Month, and at this time they celebrated
the marriage festival of all the gods and goddesses.
Different from this true and fruitful marriage of
the palm are the false and barren marriages of plants
which play a part in Hindoo superstition. For
example, if a Hindoo has planted a grove of mangos,
neither he nor his wife may taste of the fruit until
he has formally married one of the trees, as a bridegroom,
to a tree of a different sort, commonly a tamarind-tree,
which grows near it in the grove. If there is
no tamarind to act as bride, a jasmine will serve
the turn. The expenses of such a marriage are
often considerable, for the more Brahmans are feasted
at it, the greater the glory of the owner of the grove.
A family has been known to sell its golden and silver
trinkets, and to borrow all the money they could in
order to marry a mango-tree to a jasmine with due
pomp and ceremony. On Christmas Eve German peasants
used to tie fruit-trees together with straw ropes to
make them bear fruit, saying that the trees were thus
married.
In the Moluccas, when the clove-trees
are in blossom, they are treated like pregnant women.
No noise may be made near them; no light or fire may
be carried past them at night; no one may approach
them with his hat on, all must uncover in their presence.
These precautions are observed lest the tree should
be alarmed and bear no fruit, or should drop its fruit
too soon, like the untimely delivery of a woman who
has been frightened in her pregnancy. So in the
East the growing rice-crop is often treated with the
same considerate regard as a breeding woman.
Thus in Amboyna, when the rice is in bloom, the people
say that it is pregnant and fire no guns and make
no other noises near the field, for fear lest, if the
rice were thus disturbed, it would miscarry, and the
crop would be all straw and no grain.
Sometimes it is the souls of the dead
which are believed to animate trees. The Dieri
tribe of Central Australia regard as very sacred certain
trees which are supposed to be their fathers transformed;
hence they speak with reverence of these trees, and
are careful that they shall not be cut down or burned.
If the settlers require them to hew down the trees,
they earnestly protest against it, asserting that
were they to do so they would have no luck, and might
be punished for not protecting their ancestors.
Some of the Philippine Islanders believe that the
souls of their ancestors are in certain trees, which
they therefore spare. If they are obliged to fell
one of these trees, they excuse themselves to it by
saying that it was the priest who made them do it.
The spirits take up their abode, by preference, in
tall and stately trees with great spreading branches.
When the wind rustles the leaves, the natives fancy
it is the voice of the spirit; and they never pass
near one of these trees without bowing respectfully,
and asking pardon of the spirit for disturbing his
repose. Among the Ignorrotes, every village has
its sacred tree, in which the souls of the dead forefathers
of the hamlet reside. Offerings are made to the
tree, and any injury done to it is believed to entail
some misfortune on the village. Were the tree
cut down, the village and all its inhabitants would
inevitably perish.
In Corea the souls of people who die
of the plague or by the roadside, and of women who
expire in childbirth, invariably take up their abode
in trees. To such spirits offerings of cake, wine,
and pork are made on heaps of stones piled under the
trees. In China it has been customary from time
immemorial to plant trees on graves in order thereby
to strengthen the soul of the deceased and thus to
save his body from corruption; and as the evergreen
cypress and pine are deemed to be fuller of vitality
than other trees, they have been chosen by preference
for this purpose. Hence the trees that grow on
graves are sometimes identified with the souls of the
departed. Among the Miao-Kia, an aboriginal race
of Southern and Western China, a sacred tree stands
at the entrance of every village, and the inhabitants
believe that it is tenanted by the soul of their first
ancestor and that it rules their destiny. Sometimes
there is a sacred grove near a village, where the
trees are suffered to rot and die on the spot.
Their fallen branches cumber the ground, and no one
may remove them unless he has first asked leave of
the spirit of the tree and offered him a sacrifice.
Among the Maraves of Southern Africa the burial-ground
is always regarded as a holy place where neither a
tree may be felled nor a beast killed, because everything
there is supposed to be tenanted by the souls of the
dead.
In most, if not all, of these cases
the spirit is viewed as incorporate in the tree; it
animates the tree and must suffer and die with it.
But, according to another and probably later opinion,
the tree is not the body, but merely the abode of the
tree-spirit, which can quit it and return to it at
pleasure. The inhabitants of Siaoo, an East Indian
island, believe in certain sylvan spirits who dwell
in forests or in great solitary trees. At full
moon the spirit comes forth from his lurking-place
and roams about. He has a big head, very long
arms and legs, and a ponderous body. In order
to propitiate the wood-spirits people bring offerings
of food, fowls, goats, and so forth to the places
which they are supposed to haunt. The people
of Nias think that, when a tree dies, its liberated
spirit becomes a demon, which can kill a coco-nut palm
by merely lighting on its branches, and can cause
the death of all the children in a house by perching
on one of the posts that support it. Further,
they are of opinion that certain trees are at all times
inhabited by roving demons who, if the trees were damaged,
would be set free to go about on errands of mischief.
Hence the people respect these trees, and are careful
not to cut them down.
Not a few ceremonies observed at cutting
down haunted trees are based on the belief that the
spirits have it in their power to quit the trees at
pleasure or in case of need. Thus when the Pelew
Islanders are felling a tree, they conjure the spirit
of the tree to leave it and settle on another.
The wily negro of the Slave Coast, who wishes to fell
an ashorin tree, but knows that he cannot do
it so long as the spirit remains in the tree, places
a little palm-oil on the ground as a bait, and then,
when the unsuspecting spirit has quitted the tree
to partake of this dainty, hastens to cut down its
late abode. When the Toboongkoos of Celebes are
about to clear a piece of forest in order to plant
rice, they build a tiny house and furnish it with
tiny clothes and some food and gold. Then they
call together all the spirits of the wood, offer them
the little house with its contents, and beseech them
to quit the spot. After that they may safely
cut down the wood without fearing to wound themselves
in so doing. Before the Tomori, another tribe
of Celebes, fell a tall tree they lay a quid of betel
at its foot, and invite the spirit who dwells in the
tree to change his lodging; moreover, they set a little
ladder against the trunk to enable him to descend
with safety and comfort. The Mandelings of Sumatra
endeavour to lay the blame of all such misdeeds at
the door of the Dutch authorities. Thus when
a man is cutting a road through a forest and has to
fell a tall tree which blocks the way, he will not
begin to ply his axe until he has said: “Spirit
who lodgest in this tree, take it not ill that I cut
down thy dwelling, for it is done at no wish of mine
but by order of the Controller.” And when
he wishes to clear a piece of forest-land for cultivation,
it is necessary that he should come to a satisfactory
understanding with the woodland spirits who live there
before he lays low their leafy dwellings. For
this purpose he goes to the middle of the plot of
ground, stoops down, and pretends to pick up a letter.
Then unfolding a bit of paper he reads aloud an imaginary
letter from the Dutch Government, in which he is strictly
enjoined to set about clearing the land without delay.
Having done so, he says: “You hear that,
spirits. I must begin clearing at once, or I
shall be hanged.”
Even when a tree has been felled,
sawn into planks, and used to build a house, it is
possible that the woodland spirit may still be lurking
in the timber, and accordingly some people seek to
propitiate him before or after they occupy the new
house. Hence, when a new dwelling is ready the
Toradjas of Celebes kill a goat, a pig, or a buffalo,
and smear all the woodwork with its blood. If
the building is a lobo or spirit-house, a fowl
or a dog is killed on the ridge of the roof, and its
blood allowed to flow down on both sides. The
ruder Tonapoo in such a case sacrifice a human being
on the roof. This sacrifice on the roof of a
lobo or temple serves the same purpose as the
smearing of blood on the woodwork of an ordinary house.
The intention is to propitiate the forest-spirits
who may still be in the timber; they are thus put in
good humour and will do the inmates of the house no
harm. For a like reason people in Celebes and
the Moluccas are much afraid of planting a post upside
down at the building of a house; for the forest-spirit,
who might still be in the timber, would very naturally
resent the indignity and visit the inmates with sickness.
The Kayans of Borneo are of opinion that tree-spirits
stand very stiffly on the point of honour and visit
men with their displeasure for any injury done to
them. Hence after building a house, whereby they
have been forced to ill-treat many trees, these people
observe a period of penance for a year during which
they must abstain from many things, such as the killing
of bears, tiger-cats, and serpents.
2. Beneficent Powers of Tree-Spirits
WHEN a tree comes to be viewed, no
longer as the body of the tree-spirit, but simply
as its abode which it can quit at pleasure, an important
advance has been made in religious thought. Animism
is passing into polytheism. In other words, instead
of regarding each tree as a living and conscious being,
man now sees in it merely a lifeless, inert mass,
tenanted for a longer or shorter time by a supernatural
being who, as he can pass freely from tree to tree,
thereby enjoys a certain right of possession or lordship
over the trees, and, ceasing to be a tree-soul, becomes
a forest god. As soon as the tree-spirit is thus
in a measure disengaged from each particular tree,
he begins to change his shape and assume the body
of a man, in virtue of a general tendency of early
thought to clothe all abstract spiritual beings in
concrete human form. Hence in classical art the
sylvan deities are depicted in human shape, their
woodland character being denoted by a branch or some
equally obvious symbol. But this change of shape
does not affect the essential character of the tree-spirit.
The powers which he exercised as a tree-soul incorporate
in a tree, he still continues to wield as a god of
trees. This I shall now attempt to prove in detail.
I shall show, first, that trees considered as animate
beings are credited with the power of making the rain
to fall, the sun to shine, flocks and herds to multiply,
and women to bring forth easily; and, second, that
the very same powers are attributed to tree-gods conceived
as anthropomorphic beings or as actually incarnate
in living men.
First, then, trees or tree-spirits
are believed to give rain and sunshine. When
the missionary Jerome of Prague was persuading the
heathen Lithuanians to fell their sacred groves, a
multitude of women besought the Prince of Lithuania
to stop him, saying that with the woods he was destroying
the house of god from which they had been wont to
get rain and sunshine. The Mundaris in Assam think
that if a tree in the sacred grove is felled the sylvan
gods evince their displeasure by withholding rain.
In order to procure rain the inhabitants of Monyo,
a village in the Sagaing district of Upper Burma,
chose the largest tamarind-tree near the village and
named it the haunt of the spirit (nat) who
controls the rain. Then they offered bread, coco-nuts,
plantains, and fowls to the guardian spirit of the
village and to the spirit who gives rain, and they
prayed, “O Lord nat have pity on us poor
mortals, and stay not the rain. Inasmuch as our
offering is given ungrudgingly, let the rain fall
day and night.” Afterwards libations were
made in honour of the spirit of the tamarind-tree;
and still later three elderly women, dressed in fine
clothes and wearing necklaces and earrings, sang the
Rain Song.
Again, tree-spirits make the crops
to grow. Amongst the Mundaris every village has
its sacred grove, and “the grove deities are
held responsible for the crops, and are especially
honoured at all the great agricultural festivals.”
The negroes of the Gold Coast are in the habit of
sacrificing at the foot of certain tall trees, and
they think that if one of these were felled all the
fruits of the earth would perish. The Gallas
dance in couples round sacred trees, praying for a
good harvest. Every couple consists of a man and
woman, who are linked together by a stick, of which
each holds one end. Under their arms they carry
green corn or grass. Swedish peasants stick a
leafy branch in each furrow of their corn-fields,
believing that this will ensure an abundant crop.
The same idea comes out in the German and French custom
of the Harvest-May. This is a large branch or
a whole tree, which is decked with ears of corn, brought
home on the last waggon from the harvest-field, and
fastened on the roof of the farmhouse or of the barn,
where it remains for a year. Mannhardt has proved
that this branch or tree embodies the tree-spirit
conceived as the spirit of vegetation in general,
whose vivifying and fructifying influence is thus brought
to bear upon the corn in particular. Hence in
Swabia the Harvest-May is fastened amongst the last
stalks of corn left standing on the field; in other
places it is planted on the corn-field and the last
sheaf cut is attached to its trunk.
Again, the tree-spirit makes the herds
to multiply and blesses women with offspring.
In Northern India the Emblica officinalis is
a sacred tree. On the eleventh of the month Phalgun
(February) libations are poured at the foot of the
tree, a red or yellow string is bound about the trunk,
and prayers are offered to it for the fruitfulness
of women, animals, and crops. Again, in Northern
India the coco-nut is esteemed one of the most sacred
fruits, and is called Sriphala, or the fruit of Sri,
the goddess of prosperity. It is the symbol of
fertility, and all through Upper India is kept in
shrines and presented by the priests to women who desire
to become mothers. In the town of Qua, near Old
Calabar, there used to grow a palm-tree which ensured
conception to any barren woman who ate a nut from
its branches. In Europe the May-tree or May-pole
is apparently supposed to possess similar powers over
both women and cattle. Thus in some parts of
Germany on the first of May the peasants set up May-trees
or May-bushes at the doors of stables and byres, one
for each horse and cow; this is thought to make the
cows yield much milk. Of the Irish we are told
that “they fancy a green bough of a tree, fastened
on May-day against the house, will produce plenty of
milk that summer.”
On the second of July some of the
Wends used to set up an oak-tree in the middle of
the village with an iron cock fastened to its top;
then they danced round it, and drove the cattle round
it to make them thrive. The Circassians regard
the pear-tree as the protector of cattle. So
they cut down a young pear-tree in the forest, branch
it, and carry it home, where it is adored as a divinity.
Almost every house has one such pear-tree. In
autumn, on the day of the festival, the tree is carried
into the house with great ceremony to the sound of
music and amid the joyous cries of all the inmates,
who compliment it on its fortunate arrival. It
is covered with candles, and a cheese is fastened
to its top. Round about it they eat, drink, and
sing. Then they bid the tree good-bye and take
it back to the courtyard, where it remains for the
rest of the year, set up against the wall, without
receiving any mark of respect.
In the Tuhoe tribe of Maoris “the
power of making women fruitful is ascribed to trees.
These trees are associated with the navel-strings
of definite mythical ancestors, as indeed the navel-strings
of all children used to be hung upon them down to
quite recent times. A barren woman had to embrace
such a tree with her arms, and she received a male
or a female child according as she embraced the east
or the west side.” The common European custom
of placing a green bush on May Day before or on the
house of a beloved maiden probably originated in the
belief of the fertilising power of the tree-spirit.
In some parts of Bavaria such bushes are set up also
at the houses of newly-married pairs, and the practice
is only omitted if the wife is near her confinement;
for in that case they say that the husband has “set
up a May-bush for himself.” Among the South
Slavonians a barren woman, who desires to have a child,
places a new chemise upon a fruitful tree on the eve
of St. George’s Day. Next morning before
sunrise she examines the garment, and if she finds
that some living creature has crept on it, she hopes
that her wish will be fulfilled within the year.
Then she puts on the chemise, confident that she will
be as fruitful as the tree on which the garment has
passed the night. Among the Kara-Kirghiz barren
women roll themselves on the ground under a solitary
apple-tree, in order to obtain offspring. Lastly,
the power of granting to women an easy delivery at
child-birth is ascribed to trees both in Sweden and
Africa. In some districts of Sweden there was
formerly a bardträd or guardian-tree (lime,
ash, or elm) in the neighbourhood of every farm.
No one would pluck a single leaf of the sacred tree,
any injury to which was punished by ill-luck or sickness.
Pregnant women used to clasp the tree in their arms
in order to ensure an easy delivery. In some
negro tribes of the Congo region pregnant women make
themselves garments out of the bark of a certain sacred
tree, because they believe that this tree delivers
them from the dangers that attend child-bearing.
The story that Leto clasped a palm-tree and an olive-tree
or two laurel-trees, when she was about to give birth
to the divine twins Apollo and Artemis, perhaps points
to a similar Greek belief in the efficacy of certain
trees to facilitate delivery.