I is the first letter of the alphabet,
the first word of the language, the first thought
of the mind, the first object of affection. In
grammar it is a pronoun of the first person and singular
number. Its plural is said to be We,
but how there can be more than one myself is doubtless
clearer the grammarians than it is to the author of
this incomparable dictionary. Conception of
two myselfs is difficult, but fine. The frank
yet graceful use of “I” distinguishes a
good writer from a bad; the latter carries it with
the manner of a thief trying to cloak his loot.
ICHOR, n. A fluid that serves
the gods and goddesses in place of blood.
Fair Venus, speared by Diomed,
Restrained the raging chief and said:
“Behold, rash mortal, whom you’ve
bled —
Your soul’s stained white with ichorshed!”
Mary Doke
ICONOCLAST, n. A breaker of
idols, the worshipers whereof are imperfectly gratified
by the performance, and most strenuously protest that
he unbuildeth but doth not reedify, that he pulleth
down but pileth not up. For the poor things
would have other idols in place of those he thwacketh
upon the mazzard and dispelleth. But the iconoclast
saith: “Ye shall have none at all, for
ye need them not; and if the rebuilder fooleth round
hereabout, behold I will depress the head of him and
sit thereon till he squawk it.”
IDIOT, n. A member of a large
and powerful tribe whose influence in human affairs
has always been dominant and controlling. The
Idiot’s activity is not confined to any special
field of thought or action, but “pervades and
regulates the whole.” He has the last word
in everything; his decision is unappealable.
He sets the fashions and opinion of taste, dictates
the limitations of speech and circumscribes conduct
with a dead-line.
IDLENESS, n. A model farm where
the devil experiments with seeds of new sins and promotes
the growth of staple vices.
IGNORAMUS, n. A person unacquainted
with certain kinds of knowledge familiar to yourself,
and having certain other kinds that you know nothing
about.
Dumble was an ignoramus,
Mumble was for learning famous.
Mumble said one day to Dumble:
“Ignorance should be more humble.
Not a spark have you of knowledge
That was got in any college.”
Dumble said to Mumble: “Truly
You’re self-satisfied unduly.
Of things in college I’m denied
A knowledge — you of all beside.”
Borelli
ILLUMINATI, n. A sect of Spanish
heretics of the latter part of the sixteenth century;
so called because they were light weights —
cunctationes illuminati.
ILLUSTRIOUS, adj. Suitably placed
for the shafts of malice, envy and detraction.
IMAGINATION, n. A warehouse
of facts, with poet and liar in joint ownership.
IMBECILITY, n. A kind of divine
inspiration, or sacred fire affecting censorious critics
of this dictionary.
IMMIGRANT, n. An unenlightened
person who thinks one country better than another.
IMMODEST, adj. Having a strong
sense of one’s own merit, coupled with a feeble
conception of worth in others.
There was once a man in Ispahan
Ever and ever
so long ago,
And he had a head, the phrenologists said,
That fitted him
for a show.
For his modesty’s bump was so large
a lump
(Nature, they
said, had taken a freak)
That its summit stood far above the wood
Of his hair, like
a mountain peak.
So modest a man in all Ispahan,
Over and over
again they swore —
So humble and meek, you would vainly seek;
None ever was
found before.
Meantime the hump of that awful bump
Into the heavens
contrived to get
To so great a height that they called
the wight
The man with the
minaret.
There wasn’t a man in all Ispahan
Prouder, or louder
in praise of his chump:
With a tireless tongue and a brazen lung
He bragged of
that beautiful bump
Till the Shah in a rage sent a trusty
page
Bearing a sack
and a bow-string too,
And that gentle child explained as he
smiled:
“A little
present for you.”
The saddest man in all Ispahan,
Sniffed at the
gift, yet accepted the same.
“If I’d lived,” said
he, “my humility
Had given me deathless
fame!”
Sukker Uffro
IMMORAL, adj. Inexpedient.
Whatever in the long run and with regard to the greater
number of instances men find to be generally inexpedient
comes to be considered wrong, wicked, immoral.
If man’s notions of right and wrong have any
other basis than this of expediency; if they originated,
or could have originated, in any other way; if actions
have in themselves a moral character apart from, and
nowise dependent on, their consequences —
then all philosophy is a lie and reason a disorder
of the mind.
IMMORTALITY, n.
A toy which people cry for,
And on their knees apply for,
Dispute, contend and lie for,
And if allowed
Would be right
proud
Eternally to die for.
G.J.
IMPALE, v.t. In popular usage
to pierce with any weapon which remains fixed in the
wound. This, however, is inaccurate; to impale
is, properly, to put to death by thrusting an upright
sharp stake into the body, the victim being left in
a sitting position. This was a common mode of
punishment among many of the nations of antiquity,
and is still in high favor in China and other parts
of Asia. Down to the beginning of the fifteenth
century it was widely employed in “churching”
heretics and schismatics. Wolecraft calls it
the “stoole of repentynge,” and among
the common people it was jocularly known as “riding
the one legged horse.” Ludwig Salzmann
informs us that in Thibet impalement is considered
the most appropriate punishment for crimes against
religion; and although in China it is sometimes awarded
for secular offences, it is most frequently adjudged
in cases of sacrilege. To the person in actual
experience of impalement it must be a matter of minor
importance by what kind of civil or religious dissent
he was made acquainted with its discomforts; but doubtless
he would feel a certain satisfaction if able to contemplate
himself in the character of a weather-cock on the
spire of the True Church.
IMPARTIAL, adj. Unable to perceive
any promise of personal advantage from espousing either
side of a controversy or adopting either of two conflicting
opinions.
IMPENITENCE, n. A state of mind
intermediate in point of time between sin and punishment.
IMPIETY, n. Your irreverence toward my deity.
IMPOSITION, n. The act of blessing
or consecrating by the laying on of hands —
a ceremony common to many ecclesiastical systems, but
performed with the frankest sincerity by the sect known
as Thieves.
“Lo! by the laying on of hands,”
Say parson, priest
and dervise,
“We consecrate your cash and lands
To ecclesiastical
service.
No doubt you’ll swear till all is
blue
At such an imposition. Do.”
Pollo Doncas
IMPOSTOR n. A rival aspirant to public honors.
IMPROBABILITY, n.
His tale he told with a solemn face
And a tender, melancholy grace.
Improbable ’twas,
no doubt,
When you came
to think it out,
But the fascinated
crowd
Their deep surprise
avowed
And all with a single voice averred
’Twas the most amazing thing they’d
heard —
All save one who spake never a word,
But sat as mum
As if deaf and
dumb,
Serene, indifferent and unstirred.
Then all the others
turned to him
And scrutinized
him limb from limb —
Scanned him alive;
But he seemed
to thrive
And tranquiler
grow each minute,
As if there were
nothing in it.
“What! what!” cried one, “are
you not amazed
At what our friend has told?” He
raised
Soberly then his eyes and gazed
In a natural way
And proceeded
to say,
As he crossed his feet on the mantel-shelf:
“O no — not at all; I’m
a liar myself.”
IMPROVIDENCE, n. Provision for
the needs of to-day from the revenues of to-morrow.
IMPUNITY, n. Wealth.
INADMISSIBLE, adj. Not competent
to be considered. Said of certain kinds of testimony
which juries are supposed to be unfit to be entrusted
with, and which judges, therefore, rule out, even of
proceedings before themselves alone. Hearsay
evidence is inadmissible because the person quoted
was unsworn and is not before the court for examination;
yet most momentous actions, military, political, commercial
and of every other kind, are daily undertaken on hearsay
evidence. There is no religion in the world that
has any other basis than hearsay evidence. Revelation
is hearsay evidence; that the Scriptures are the word
of God we have only the testimony of men long dead
whose identity is not clearly established and who are
not known to have been sworn in any sense. Under
the rules of evidence as they now exist in this country,
no single assertion in the Bible has in its support
any evidence admissible in a court of law. It
cannot be proved that the battle of Blenheim ever
was fought, that there was such as person as Julius
Caesar, such an empire as Assyria.
But as records of courts of justice
are admissible, it can easily be proved that powerful
and malevolent magicians once existed and were a scourge
to mankind. The evidence (including confession)
upon which certain women were convicted of witchcraft
and executed was without a flaw; it is still unimpeachable.
The judges’ decisions based on it were sound
in logic and in law. Nothing in any existing
court was ever more thoroughly proved than the charges
of witchcraft and sorcery for which so many suffered
death. If there were no witches, human testimony
and human reason are alike destitute of value.
INAUSPICIOUSLY, adv. In an unpromising
manner, the auspices being unfavorable. Among
the Romans it was customary before undertaking any
important action or enterprise to obtain from the augurs,
or state prophets, some hint of its probable outcome;
and one of their favorite and most trustworthy modes
of divination consisted in observing the flight of
birds — the omens thence derived being called
auspices. Newspaper reporters and certain
miscreant lexicographers have decided that the word
— always in the plural — shall
mean “patronage” or “management”;
as, “The festivities were under the auspices
of the Ancient and Honorable Order of Body-Snatchers”;
or, “The hilarities were auspicated by the Knights
of Hunger.”
A Roman slave appeared one day
Before the Augur. “Tell me,
pray,
If —” here the Augur,
smiling, made
A checking gesture and displayed
His open palm, which plainly itched,
For visibly its surface twitched.
A denarius (the Latin nickel)
Successfully allayed the tickle,
And then the slave proceeded: “Please
Inform me whether Fate decrees
Success or failure in what I
To-night (if it be dark) shall try.
Its nature? Never mind —
I think
’Tis writ on this” —
and with a wink
Which darkened half the earth, he drew
Another denarius to view,
Its shining face attentive scanned,
Then slipped it into the good man’s
hand,
Who with great gravity said: “Wait
While I retire to question Fate.”
That holy person then withdrew
His scared clay and, passing through
The temple’s rearward gate, cried
“Shoo!”
Waving his robe of office. Straight
Each sacred peacock and its mate
(Maintained for Juno’s favor) fled
With clamor from the trees o’erhead,
Where they were perching for the night.
The temple’s roof received their
flight,
For thither they would always go,
When danger threatened them below.
Back to the slave the Augur went:
“My son, forecasting the event
By flight of birds, I must confess
The auspices deny success.”
That slave retired, a sadder man,
Abandoning his secret plan —
Which was (as well the craft seer
Had from the first divined) to clear
The wall and fraudulently seize
On Juno’s poultry in the trees.
G.J.
INCOME, n. The natural and rational
gauge and measure of respectability, the commonly
accepted standards being artificial, arbitrary and
fallacious; for, as “Sir Sycophas Chrysolater”
in the play has justly remarked, “the true use
and function of property (in whatsoever it consisteth
— coins, or land, or houses, or merchant-stuff,
or anything which may be named as holden of right to
one’s own subservience) as also of honors, titles,
preferments and place, and all favor and acquaintance
of persons of quality or ableness, are but to get
money. Hence it followeth that all things are
truly to be rated as of worth in measure of their
serviceableness to that end; and their possessors
should take rank in agreement thereto, neither the
lord of an unproducing manor, howsoever broad and ancient,
nor he who bears an unremunerate dignity, nor yet
the pauper favorite of a king, being esteemed of level
excellency with him whose riches are of daily accretion;
and hardly should they whose wealth is barren claim
and rightly take more honor than the poor and unworthy.”
INCOMPATIBILITY, n. In matrimony
a similarity of tastes, particularly the taste for
domination. Incompatibility may, however, consist
of a meek-eyed matron living just around the corner.
It has even been known to wear a moustache.
INCOMPOSSIBLE, adj. Unable to
exist if something else exists. Two things are
incompossible when the world of being has scope enough
for one of them, but not enough for both —
as Walt Whitman’s poetry and God’s mercy
to man. Incompossibility, it will be seen, is
only incompatibility let loose. Instead of such
low language as “Go heel yourself —
I mean to kill you on sight,” the words, “Sir,
we are incompossible,” would convey and equally
significant intimation and in stately courtesy are
altogether superior.
INCUBUS, n. One of a race of
highly improper demons who, though probably not wholly
extinct, may be said to have seen their best nights.
For a complete account of incubi and succubi,
including incubae and succubae, see
the Liber Demonorum of Protassus (Paris, 1328),
which contains much curious information that would
be out of place in a dictionary intended as a text-book
for the public schools.
Victor Hugo relates that in the Channel
Islands Satan himself —
tempted more than elsewhere by the beauty of the women,
doubtless — sometimes plays at incubus,
greatly to the inconvenience and alarm of the good
dames who wish to be loyal to their marriage vows,
generally speaking. A certain lady applied to
the parish priest to learn how they might, in the
dark, distinguish the hardy intruder from their husbands.
The holy man said they must feel his brown for horns;
but Hugo is ungallant enough to hint a doubt of the
efficacy of the test.
INCUMBENT, n. A person of the
liveliest interest to the outcumbents.
INDECISION, n. The chief element
of success; “for whereas,” saith Sir Thomas
Brewbold, “there is but one way to do nothing
and divers way to do something, whereof, to a surety,
only one is the right way, it followeth that he who
from indecision standeth still hath not so many chances
of going astray as he who pusheth forwards” —
a most clear and satisfactory exposition on the matter.
“Your prompt decision to attack,”
said Genera Grant on a certain
occasion to General Gordon Granger, “was admirable;
you had but five minutes to make up your mind in.”
“Yes, sir,” answered the victorious
subordinate, “it is a great
thing to be know exactly what to do in an emergency.
When in doubt whether to attack or retreat I never
hesitate a moment — I toss us a copper.”
“Do you mean to say that’s
what you did this time?”
“Yes, General; but for Heaven’s
sake don’t reprimand me: I
disobeyed the coin.”
INDIFFERENT, adj. Imperfectly
sensible to distinctions among things.
“You tiresome man!” cried
Indolentio’s wife,
“You’ve grown indifferent
to all in life.”
“Indifferent?” he drawled
with a slow smile;
“I would be, dear, but it is not
worth while.”
Apuleius M. Gokul
INDIGESTION, n. A disease which
the patient and his friends frequently mistake for
deep religious conviction and concern for the salvation
of mankind. As the simple Red Man of the western
wild put it, with, it must be confessed, a certain
force: “Plenty well, no pray; big bellyache,
heap God.”
INDISCRETION, n. The guilt of woman.
INEXPEDIENT, adj. Not calculated to advance
one’s interests.
INFANCY, n. The period of our
lives when, according to Wordsworth, “Heaven
lies about us.” The world begins lying
about us pretty soon afterward.
INFERIAE,n. [Latin] Among the Greeks
and Romans, sacrifices for propitiation of the Dii
Manes, or souls of the dead heroes; for the pious
ancients could not invent enough gods to satisfy their
spiritual needs, and had to have a number of makeshift
deities, or, as a sailor might say, jury-gods, which
they made out of the most unpromising materials.
It was while sacrificing a bullock to the spirit of
Agamemnon that Laiaides, a priest of Aulis, was favored
with an audience of that illustrious warrior’s
shade, who prophetically recounted to him the birth
of Christ and the triumph of Christianity, giving
him also a rapid but tolerably complete review of events
down to the reign of Saint Louis. The narrative
ended abruptly at the point, owing to the inconsiderate
crowing of a cock, which compelled the ghosted King
of Men to scamper back to Hades. There is a fine
mediaeval flavor to this story, and as it has not been
traced back further than Pere Brateille, a pious but
obscure writer at the court of Saint Louis, we shall
probably not err on the side of presumption in considering
it apocryphal, though Monsignor Capel’s judgment
of the matter might be different; and to that I bow
— wow.
INFIDEL, n. In New York, one
who does not believe in the Christian religion; in
Constantinople, one who does. (See GIAOUR.) A kind
of scoundrel imperfectly reverent of, and niggardly
contributory to, divines, ecclesiastics, popes, parsons,
canons, monks, mollahs, voodoos, presbyters, hierophants,
prelates, obeah-men, abbes, nuns, missionaries, exhorters,
deacons, friars, hadjis, high-priests, muezzins, brahmins,
medicine-men, confessors, eminences, elders, primates,
prebendaries, pilgrims, prophets, imaums, beneficiaries,
clerks, vicars-choral, archbishops, bishops, abbots,
priors, preachers, padres, abbotesses, caloyers, palmers,
curates, patriarchs, bonezs, santons, beadsmen, canonesses,
residentiaries, diocesans, deans, subdeans, rural
deans, abdals, charm-sellers, archdeacons, hierarchs,
class-leaders, incumbents, capitulars, sheiks, talapoins,
postulants, scribes, gooroos, precentors, beadles,
fakeers, sextons, reverences, revivalists, cenobites,
perpetual curates, chaplains, mudjoes, readers, novices,
vicars, pastors, rabbis, ulemas, lamas, sacristans,
vergers, dervises, lectors, church wardens, cardinals,
prioresses, suffragans, acolytes, rectors, cures, sophis,
mutifs and pumpums.
INFLUENCE, n. In politics, a
visionary quo given in exchange for a substantial
quid.
INFALAPSARIAN, n. One who ventures
to believe that Adam need not have sinned unless he
had a mind to — in opposition to the Supralapsarians,
who hold that that luckless person’s fall was
decreed from the beginning. Infralapsarians
are sometimes called Sublapsarians without material
effect upon the importance and lucidity of their views
about Adam.
Two theologues once, as they wended their
way
To chapel, engaged in colloquial fray
—
An earnest logomachy, bitter as gall,
Concerning poor Adam and what made him
fall.
“’Twas Predestination,”
cried one — “for the Lord
Decreed he should fall of his own accord.”
“Not so — ’twas
Free will,” the other maintained,
“Which led him to choose what the
Lord had ordained.”
So fierce and so fiery grew the debate
That nothing but bloodshed their dudgeon
could sate;
So off flew their cassocks and caps to
the ground
And, moved by the spirit, their hands
went round.
Ere either had proved his theology right
By winning, or even beginning, the fight,
A gray old professor of Latin came by,
A staff in his hand and a scowl in his
eye,
And learning the cause of their quarrel
(for still
As they clumsily sparred they disputed
with skill
Of foreordination freedom of will)
Cried: “Sirrahs! this reasonless
warfare compose:
Atwixt ye’s no difference worthy
of blows.
The sects ye belong to — I’m
ready to swear
Ye wrongly interpret the names that they
bear.
You — Infralapsarian
son of a clown! —
Should only contend that Adam slipped
down;
While you — you Supralapsarian
pup! —
Should nothing aver but that Adam slipped
up.
It’s all the same whether up or
down
You slip on a peel of banana brown.
Even Adam analyzed not his blunder,
But thought he had slipped on a peal of
thunder!
G.J.
INGRATE, n. One who receives
a benefit from another, or is otherwise an object
of charity.
“All men are ingrates,”
sneered the cynic. “Nay,”
The good philanthropist replied;
“I did great service to a man one day
Who never since has cursed me to repay,
Nor vilified.”
“Ho!” cried the cynic,
“lead me to him straight —
With veneration I am overcome,
And fain would have his blessing.” “Sad
your fate —
He cannot bless you, for AI grieve to state
This man is dumb.”
Ariel Selp
INJURY, n. An offense next in degree of enormity
to a slight.
INJUSTICE, n. A burden which
of all those that we load upon others and carry ourselves
is lightest in the hands and heaviest upon the back.
INK, n. A villainous compound
of tannogallate of iron, gum-arabic and water, chiefly
used to facilitate the infection of idiocy and promote
intellectual crime. The properties of ink are
peculiar and contradictory: it may be used to
make reputations and unmake them; to blacken them
and to make them white; but it is most generally and
acceptably employed as a mortar to bind together the
stones of an edifice of fame, and as a whitewash to
conceal afterward the rascal quality of the material.
There are men called journalists who have established
ink baths which some persons pay money to get into,
others to get out of. Not infrequently it occurs
that a person who has paid to get in pays twice as
much to get out.
INNATE, adj. Natural, inherent
— as innate ideas, that is to say, ideas
that we are born with, having had them previously imparted
to us. The doctrine of innate ideas is one of
the most admirable faiths of philosophy, being itself
an innate idea and therefore inaccessible to disproof,
though Locke foolishly supposed himself to have given
it “a black eye.” Among innate ideas
may be mentioned the belief in one’s ability
to conduct a newspaper, in the greatness of one’s
country, in the superiority of one’s civilization,
in the importance of one’s personal affairs
and in the interesting nature of one’s diseases.
IN’ARDS, n. The stomach,
heart, soul and other bowels. Many eminent investigators
do not class the soul as an in’ard, but that
acute observer and renowned authority, Dr. Gunsaulus,
is persuaded that the mysterious organ known as the
spleen is nothing less than our important part.
To the contrary, Professor Garrett P. Servis holds
that man’s soul is that prolongation of his spinal
marrow which forms the pith of his no tail; and for
demonstration of his faith points confidently to the
fact that no tailed animals have no souls. Concerning
these two theories, it is best to suspend judgment
by believing both.
INSCRIPTION, n. Something written
on another thing. Inscriptions are of many kinds,
but mostly memorial, intended to commemorate the fame
of some illustrious person and hand down to distant
ages the record of his services and virtues.
To this class of inscriptions belongs the name of
John Smith, penciled on the Washington monument.
Following are examples of memorial inscriptions on
tombstones: (See EPITAPH.)
“In the sky my soul is found,
And my body in the ground.
By and by my body’ll rise
To my spirit in the skies,
Soaring up to Heaven’s gate.
1878.”
“Sacred to the memory of Jeremiah
Tree. Cut down May 9th, 1862, aged 27 yrs. 4
mos. and 12 ds. Indigenous.”
“Affliction
sore long time she boar,
Phisicians
was in vain,
Till Deth released
the dear deceased
And
left her a remain.
Gone to join Ananias in the regions of
bliss.”
“The clay that rests beneath this
stone
As Silas Wood was widely known.
Now, lying here, I ask what good
It was to let me be S. Wood.
O Man, let not ambition trouble you,
Is the advice of Silas W.”
“Richard Haymon, of Heaven.
Fell to Earth Jan. 20, 1807, and had the dust brushed
off him Oct. 3, 1874.”
INSECTIVORA, n.
“See,” cries the chorus of
admiring preachers,
“How Providence provides for all
His creatures!”
“His care,” the gnat said,
“even the insects follows:
For us He has provided wrens and swallows.”
Sempen Railey
INSURANCE, n. An ingenious modern
game of chance in which the player is permitted to
enjoy the comfortable conviction that he is beating
the man who keeps the table.
INSURANCE AGENT: My dear sir, that
is a fine house — pray let me
insure it.
HOUSE OWNER: With pleasure.
Please make the annual premium so
low that by the
time when, according to the tables of your
actuary, it will
probably be destroyed by fire I will have
paid you considerably
less than the face of the policy.
INSURANCE AGENT: O dear, no —
we could not afford to do that.
We must fix the
premium so that you will have paid more.
HOUSE OWNER: How, then, can I
afford that?
INSURANCE AGENT: Why, your house
may burn down at any time.
There was Smith’s
house, for example, which —
HOUSE OWNER: Spare me —
there were Brown’s house, on the
contrary, and
Jones’s house, and Robinson’s house, which
—
INSURANCE AGENT: Spare me!
HOUSE OWNER: Let us understand each
other. You want me to pay
you money on the
supposition that something will occur
previously to
the time set by yourself for its occurrence.
In
other words, you
expect me to bet that my house will not last
so long as you
say that it will probably last.
INSURANCE AGENT: But if your house
burns without insurance it
will be a total
loss.
HOUSE OWNER: Beg your pardon —
by your own actuary’s tables I
shall probably
have saved, when it burns, all the premiums I
would otherwise
have paid to you — amounting to more than
the
face of the policy
they would have bought. But suppose it to
burn, uninsured,
before the time upon which your figures are
based. If
I could not afford that, how could you if it were
insured?
INSURANCE AGENT: O, we should make
ourselves whole from our
luckier ventures
with other clients. Virtually, they pay your
loss.
HOUSE OWNER: And virtually, then,
don’t I help to pay their
losses?
Are not their houses as likely as mine to burn before
they have paid
you as much as you must pay them? The case
stands this way:
you expect to take more money from your
clients than you
pay to them, do you not?
INSURANCE AGENT: Certainly; if we
did not —
HOUSE OWNER: I would not trust you
with my money. Very well
then. If
it is certain, with reference to the whole body
of
your clients,
that they lose money on you it is probable,
with reference
to any one of them, that he will. It is
these individual
probabilities that make the aggregate
certainty.
INSURANCE AGENT: I will not deny
it — but look at the figures in
this pamph —
HOUSE OWNER: Heaven forbid!
INSURANCE AGENT: You spoke of saving
the premiums which you would
otherwise pay
to me. Will you not be more likely to squander
them? We
offer you an incentive to thrift.
HOUSE OWNER: The willingness of
A to take care of B’s money is
not peculiar to
insurance, but as a charitable institution you
command esteem.
Deign to accept its expression from a
Deserving Object.
INSURRECTION, n. An unsuccessful
revolution. Disaffection’s failure to
substitute misrule for bad government.
INTENTION, n. The mind’s
sense of the prevalence of one set of influences over
another set; an effect whose cause is the imminence,
immediate or remote, of the performance of an involuntary
act.
INTERPRETER, n. One who enables
two persons of different languages to understand each
other by repeating to each what it would have been
to the interpreter’s advantage for the other
to have said.
INTERREGNUM, n. The period during
which a monarchical country is governed by a warm
spot on the cushion of the throne. The experiment
of letting the spot grow cold has commonly been attended
by most unhappy results from the zeal of many worthy
persons to make it warm again.
INTIMACY, n. A relation into
which fools are providentially drawn for their mutual
destruction.
Two Seidlitz powders, one in blue
And one in white, together drew
And having each a pleasant sense
Of t’other powder’s excellence,
Forsook their jackets for the snug
Enjoyment of a common mug.
So close their intimacy grew
One paper would have held the two.
To confidences straight they fell,
Less anxious each to hear than tell;
Then each remorsefully confessed
To all the virtues he possessed,
Acknowledging he had them in
So high degree it was a sin.
The more they said, the more they felt
Their spirits with emotion melt,
Till tears of sentiment expressed
Their feelings. Then they effervesced!
So Nature executes her feats
Of wrath on friends and sympathetes
The good old rule who don’t apply,
That you are you and I am I.
INTRODUCTION, n. A social ceremony
invented by the devil for the gratification of his
servants and the plaguing of his enemies. The
introduction attains its most malevolent development
in this century, being, indeed, closely related to
our political system. Every American being the
equal of every other American, it follows that everybody
has the right to know everybody else, which implies
the right to introduce without request or permission.
The Declaration of Independence should have read
thus:
“We hold
these truths to be self-evident: that all men
are
created equal; that they are endowed by
their Creator with certain
inalienable rights; that among these are
life, and the right to
make that of another miserable by thrusting
upon him an
incalculable quantity of acquaintances;
liberty, particularly the
liberty to introduce persons to one another
without first
ascertaining if they are not already acquainted
as enemies; and
the pursuit of another’s happiness
with a running pack of
strangers.”
INVENTOR, n. A person who makes
an ingenious arrangement of wheels, levers and springs,
and believes it civilization.
IRRELIGION, n. The principal
one of the great faiths of the world.
ITCH, n. The patriotism of a Scotchman.