And now to tell of the queerest thing
of all. About two years after his cure I dined
with the Davidsons, and after dinner a man named Atkins
called in. He is a lieutenant in the Royal Navy,
and a pleasant, talkative man. He was on friendly
terms with my brother-in-law, and was soon on friendly
terms with me. It came out that he was engaged
to Davidson’s cousin, and incidentally he took
out a kind of pocket photograph case to show us a
new rendering of his fiancée. “And,
by-the-by,” said he, “here’s the
old Fulmar.”
Davidson looked at it casually.
Then suddenly his face lit up. “Good heavens!”
said he. “I could almost swear——”
“What?” said Atkins.
“That I had seen that ship before.”
“Don’t see how you can
have. She hasn’t been out of the South Seas
for six years, and before then——”
“But,” began Davidson,
and then, “Yes—that’s the ship
I dreamt of; I’m sure that’s the ship
I dreamt of. She was standing off an island that
swarmed with penguins, and she fired a gun.”
“Good Lord!” said Atkins,
who had now heard the particulars of the seizure.
“How the deuce could you dream that?”
And then, bit by bit, it came out
that on the very day Davidson was seized, H.M.S. Fulmar
had actually been off a little rock to the south of
Antipodes Island. A boat had landed overnight
to get penguins’ eggs, had been delayed, and
a thunderstorm drifting up, the boat’s crew
had waited until the morning before rejoining the ship.
Atkins had been one of them, and he corroborated,
word for word, the descriptions Davidson had given
of the island and the boat. There is not the slightest
doubt in any of our minds that Davidson has really
seen the place. In some unaccountable way, while
he moved hither and thither in London, his sight moved
hither and thither in a manner that corresponded, about
this distant island. How is absolutely a mystery.
That completes the remarkable story
of Davidson’s eyes. It’s perhaps the
best authenticated case in existence of real vision
at a distance. Explanation there is none forthcoming,
except what Professor Wade has thrown out. But
his explanation invokes the Fourth Dimension, and a
dissertation on theoretical kinds of space. To
talk of there being “a kink in space”
seems mere nonsense to me; it may be because I am no
mathematician. When I said that nothing would
alter the fact that the place is eight thousand miles
away, he answered that two points might be a yard
away on a sheet of paper, and yet be brought together
by bending the paper round. The reader may grasp
his argument, but I certainly do not. His idea
seems to be that Davidson, stooping between the poles
of the big electro-magnet, had some extraordinary
twist given to his retinal elements through the sudden
change in the field of force due to the lightning.
He thinks, as a consequence of this,
that it may be possible to live visually in one part
of the world, while one lives bodily in another.
He has even made some experiments in support of his
views; but, so far, he has simply succeeded in blinding
a few dogs. I believe that is the net result
of his work, though I have not seen him for some weeks.
Latterly I have been so busy with my work in connection
with the Saint Pancras installation that I have had
little opportunity of calling to see him. But
the whole of his theory seems fantastic to me.
The facts concerning Davidson stand on an altogether
different footing, and I can testify personally to
the accuracy of every detail I have given.