There stands a house at a corner of
a street, in the middle of a town, in one of the least
important prefectures in France, but the name of the
street and the name of the town must be suppressed
here. Every one will appreciate the motives of
this sage reticence demanded by convention; for if
a writer takes upon himself the office of annalist
of his own time, he is bound to touch on many sore
subjects. The house was called the Hotel d’Esgrignon;
but let d’Esgrignon be considered a mere fancy
name, neither more nor less connected with real people
than the conventional Belval, Floricour, or Derville
of the stage, or the Adalberts and Mombreuses of romance.
After all, the names of the principal characters will
be quite as much disguised; for though in this history
the chronicler would prefer to conceal the facts under
a mass of contradictions, anachronisms, improbabilities,
and absurdities, the truth will out in spite of him.
You uproot a vine-stock, as you imagine, and the stem
will send up lusty shoots after you have ploughed
your vineyard over.
The “Hotel d’Esgrignon”
was nothing more nor less than the house in which
the old Marquis lived; or, in the style of ancient
documents, Charles Marie Victor Ange Carol, Marquis
d’Esgrignon. It was only an ordinary house,
but the townspeople and tradesmen had begun by calling
it the Hotel d’Esgrignon in jest, and ended after
a score of years by giving it that name in earnest.
The name of Carol, or Karawl, as the
Thierrys would have spelt it, was glorious among the
names of the most powerful chieftains of the Northmen
who conquered Gaul and established the feudal system
there. Never had Carol bent his head before King
or Communes, the Church or Finance. Intrusted
in the days of yore with the keeping of a French March,
the title of marquis in their family meant no shadow
of imaginary office; it had been a post of honor with
duties to discharge. Their fief had always been
their domain. Provincial nobles were they in
every sense of the word; they might boast of an unbroken
line of great descent; they had been neglected by the
court for two hundred years; they were lords paramount
in the estates of a province where the people looked
up to them with superstitious awe, as to the image
of the Holy Virgin that cures the toothache. The
house of d’Esgrignon, buried in its remote border
country, was preserved as the charred piles of one
of Caesar’s bridges are maintained intact in
a river bed. For thirteen hundred years the daughters
of the house had been married without a dowry or taken
the veil; the younger sons of every generation had
been content with their share of their mother’s
dower and gone forth to be captains or bishops; some
had made a marriage at court; one cadet of the house
became an admiral, a duke, and a peer of France, and
died without issue. Never would the Marquis d’Esgrignon
of the elder branch accept the title of duke.
“I hold my marquisate as His
Majesty holds the realm of France, and on the same
conditions,” he told the Constable de Luynes,
a very paltry fellow in his eyes at that time.
You may be sure that d’Esgrignons
lost their heads on the scaffold during the troubles.
The old blood showed itself proud and high even in
1789. The Marquis of that day would not emigrate;
he was answerable for his March. The reverence
in which he was held by the countryside saved his
head; but the hatred of the genuine sans-culottes was
strong enough to compel him to pretend to fly, and
for a while he lived in hiding. Then, in the
name of the Sovereign People, the d’Esgrignon
lands were dishonored by the District, and the woods
sold by the Nation in spite of the personal protest
made by the Marquis, then turned forty. Mlle.
d’Esgrignon, his half-sister, saved some portions
of the fief, thanks to the young steward of the family,
who claimed on her behalf the partage de presuccession,
which is to say, the right of a relative to a portion
of the emigre’s lands. To Mlle. d’Esgrignon,
therefore, the Republic made over the castle itself
and a few farms. Chesnel [Choisnel], the faithful
steward, was obliged to buy in his own name the church,
the parsonage house, the castle gardens, and other
places to which his patron was attached—the
Marquis advancing the money.
The slow, swift years of the Terror
went by, and the Marquis, whose character had won
the respect of the whole country, decided that he
and his sister ought to return to the castle and improve
the property which Maitre Chesnel—for he
was now a notary—had contrived to save
for them out of the wreck. Alas! was not the plundered
and dismantled castle all too vast for a lord of the
manor shorn of all his ancient rights; too large for
the landowner whose woods had been sold piecemeal,
until he could scarce draw nine thousand francs of
income from the pickings of his old estates?
It was in the month of October 1800
that Chesnel brought the Marquis back to the old feudal
castle, and saw with deep emotion, almost beyound
his control, his patron standing in the midst of the
empty courtyard, gazing round upon the moat, now filled
up with rubbish, and the castle towers razed to the
level of the roof. The descendant of the Franks
looked for the missing Gothic turrets and the picturesque
weather vanes which used to rise above them; and his
eyes turned to the sky, as if asking of heaven the
reason of this social upheaval. No one but Chesnel
could understand the profound anguish of the great
d’Esgrignon, now known as Citizen Carol.
For a long while the Marquis stood in silence, drinking
in the influences of the place, the ancient home of
his forefathers, with the air that he breathed; then
he flung out a most melancholy exclamation.
“Chesnel,” he said, “we
will come back again some day when the troubles are
over; I could not bring myself to live here until the
edict of pacification has been published; they
will not allow me to set my scutcheon on the wall.”
He waved his hand toward the castle,
mounted his horse, and rode back beside his sister,
who had driven over in the notary’s shabby basket-chaise.
The Hotel d’Esgrignon in the
town had been demolished; a couple of factories now
stood on the site of the aristocrat’s house.
So Maitre Chesnel spent the Marquis’ last bag
of louis on the purchase of the old-fashioned building
in the square, with its gables, weather-vane, turret,
and dovecote. Once it had been the courthouse
of the bailiwick, and subsequently the presidial;
it had belonged to the d’Esgrignons from generation
to generation; and now, in consideration of five hundred
louis d’or, the present owner made it over with
the title given by the Nation to its rightful lord.
And so, half in jest, half in earnest, the old house
was christened the Hotel d’Esgrignon.
In 1800 little or no difficulty was
made over erasing names from the fatal list, and some
few emigres began to return. Among the very first
nobles to come back to the old town were the Baron
de Nouastre and his daughter. They were completely
ruined. M. d’Esgrignon generously offered
them the shelter of his roof; and in his house, two
months later, the Baron died, worn out with grief.
The Nouastres came of the best blood in the province;
Mlle. de Nouastre was a girl of two-and-twenty;
the Marquis d’Esgrignon married her to continue
his line. But she died in childbirth, a victim
to the unskilfulness of her physician, leaving, most
fortunately, a son to bear the name of the d’Esgrignons.
The old Marquis—he was but fifty-three,
but adversity and sharp distress had added months
to every year—the poor old Marquis saw
the death of the loveliest of human creatures, a noble
woman in whom the charm of the feminine figures of
the sixteenth century lived again, a charm now lost
save to men’s imaginations. With her death
the joy died out of his old age. It was one of
those terrible shocks which reverberate through every
moment of the years that follow. For a few moments
he stood beside the bed where his wife lay, with her
hands folded like a saint, then he kissed her on the
forehead, turned away, drew out his watch, broke the
mainspring, and hung it up beside the hearth.
It was eleven o’clock in the morning.
“Mlle. d’Esgrignon,”
he said, “let us pray God that this hour may
not prove fatal yet again to our house. My uncle
the archbishop was murdered at this hour; at this
hour also my father died——”
He knelt down beside the bed and buried
his face in the coverlet; his sister did the same,
in another moment they both rose to their feet.
Mlle. d’Esgrignon burst into tears; but
the old Marquis looked with dry eyes at the child,
round the room, and again on his dead wife. To
the stubbornness of the Frank he united the fortitude
of a Christian.
These things came to pass in the second
year of the nineteenth century. Mlle. d’Esgrignon
was then twenty-seven years of age. She was a
beautiful woman. An ex-contractor for forage to
the armies of the Republic, a man of the district,
with an income of six thousand francs, persuaded Chesnel
to carry a proposal of marriage to the lady.
The Marquis and his sister were alike indignant with
such presumption in their man of business, and Chesnel
was almost heartbroken; he could not forgive himself
for yielding to the Sieur du Croisier’s [du
Bousquier] blandishments. The Marquis’ manner
with his old servant changed somewhat; never again
was there quite the old affectionate kindliness, which
might almost have been taken for friendship. From
that time forth the Marquis was grateful, and his magnanimous
and sincere gratitude continually wounded the poor
notary’s feelings. To some sublime natures
gratitude seems an excessive payment; they would rather
have that sweet equality of feeling which springs from
similar ways of thought, and the blending of two spirits
by their own choice and will. And Maitre Chesnel
had known the delights of such high friendship; the
Marquis had raised him to his own level. The old
noble looked on the good notary as something more
than a servant, something less than a child; he was
the voluntary liege man of the house, a serf bound
to his lord by all the ties of affection. There
was no balancing of obligations; the sincere affection
on either side put them out of the question.
In the eyes of the Marquis, Chesnel’s
official dignity was as nothing; his old servitor
was merely disguised as a notary. As for Chesnel,
the Marquis was now, as always, a being of a divine
race; he believed in nobility; he did not blush to
remember that his father had thrown open the doors
of the salon to announce that “My Lord Marquis
is served.” His devotion to the fallen
house was due not so much to his creed as to egoism;
he looked on himself as one of the family. So
his vexation was intense. Once he had ventured
to allude to his mistake in spite of the Marquis’
prohibition, and the old noble answered gravely —“Chesnel,
before the troubles you would not have permitted yourself
to entertain such injurious suppositions. What
can these new doctrines be if they have spoiled you?”
Maitre Chesnel had gained the confidence
of the whole town; people looked up to him; his high
integrity and considerable fortune contributed to
make him a person of importance. From that time
forth he felt a very decided aversion for the Sieur
du Crosier; and though there was little rancor in
his composition, he set others against the sometime
forage-contractor. Du Croisier, on the other hand,
was a man to bear a grudge and nurse a vengeance for
a score of years. He hated Chesnel and the d’Esgrignon
family with the smothered, all-absorbing hate only
to be found in a country town. His rebuff had
simply ruined him with the malicious provincials among
whom he had come to live, thinking to rule over them.
It was so real a disaster that he was not long in
feeling the consequences of it. He betook himself
in desperation to a wealthy old maid, and met with
a second refusal. Thus failed the ambitious schemes
with which he had started. He had lost his hope
of a marriage with Mlle. d’Esgrignon, which
would have opened the Faubourg Saint-Germain of the
province to him; and after the second rejection, his
credit fell away to such an extent that it was almost
as much as he could do to keep his position in the
second rank.
In 1805, M. de la Roche-Guyon, the
oldest son of an ancient family which had previously
intermarried with the d’Esgrignons, made proposals
in form through Maitre Chesnel for Mlle. Marie
Armande Clair d’Esgrignon. She declined
to hear the notary.
“You must have guessed before
now that I am a mother, dear Chesnel,” she said;
she had just put her nephew, a fine little boy of five,
to bed.
The old Marquis rose and went up to
his sister, but just returned from the cradle; he
kissed her hand reverently, and as he sat down again,
found words to say:
“My sister, you are a d’Esgrignon.”
A quiver ran through the noble girl;
the tears stood in her eyes. M. d’Esgrignon,
the father of the present Marquis, had married a second
wife, the daughter of a farmer of taxes ennobled by
Louis XIV. It was a shocking mesalliance in the
eyes of his family, but fortunately of no importance,
since a daughter was the one child of the marriage.
Armande knew this. Kind as her brother had always
been, he looked on her as a stranger in blood.
And this speech of his had just recognized her as
one of the family.
And was not her answer the worthy
crown of eleven years of her noble life? Her
every action since she came of age had borne the stamp
of the purest devotion; love for her brother was a
sort of religion with her.
“I shall die Mlle. d’Esgrignon,”
she said simply, turning to the notary.
“For you there could be no fairer
title,” returned Chesnel, meaning to convey
a compliment. Poor Mlle. d’Esgrignon
reddened.
“You have blundered, Chesnel,”
said the Marquis, flattered by the steward’s
words, but vexed that his sister had been hurt.
“A d’Esgrignon may marry a Montmorency;
their descent is not so pure as ours. The d’Esgrignons
bear or, two bends, gules,” he continued, “and
nothing during nine hundred years has changed their
scutcheon; as it was at first, so it is to-day.
Hence our device, Cil est nostre, taken at a
tournament in the reign of Philip Augustus, with the
supporters, a knight in armor or on the right, and
a lion gules on the left.”