Part 2
Forms of speech are either simple
or composite. Examples of the latter are such
expressions as ‘the man runs’, ‘the
man wins’; of the former ‘man’,
‘ox’, ‘runs’, ‘wins’.
Of things themselves some are predicable
of a subject, and are never present in a subject.
Thus ‘man’ is predicable of the individual
man, and is never present in a subject.
By being ‘present in a subject’
I do not mean present as parts are present in a whole,
but being incapable of existence apart from the said
subject.
Some things, again, are present in
a subject, but are never predicable of a subject.
For instance, a certain point of grammatical knowledge
is present in the mind, but is not predicable of any
subject; or again, a certain whiteness may be present
in the body (for colour requires a material basis),
yet it is never predicable of anything.
Other things, again, are both predicable
of a subject and present in a subject. Thus while
knowledge is present in the human mind, it is predicable
of grammar.
There is, lastly, a class of things
which are neither present in a subject nor predicable
of a subject, such as the individual man or the individual
horse. But, to speak more generally, that which
is individual and has the character of a unit is never
predicable of a subject. Yet in some cases there
is nothing to prevent such being present in a subject.
Thus a certain point of grammatical knowledge is present
in a subject.