Langdon Masters arrived in San Francisco
during Madeleine’s third winter. He did
not come unheralded, for Travers bragged about him
constantly and asserted that San Francisco could thank
him for an editorial writer second to none in the
United States of America. As a matter of fact
it was on Masters’ achievement alone that the
editor of the Alta California had invited him
to become a member of his staff.
Masters was also a cousin of Alexander
Groome, and arrived in San Francisco as a guest at
the house on Ballinger Hill, a lonely outpost in the
wastes of rock and sand in the west.
There was no excitement in the female
breast over his arrival for young men were abundant;
but Society was prepared to welcome him not only on
account of his distinguished connections but because
his deliberate choice of San Francisco for his future
career was a compliment they were quick to appreciate.
He came gaily to his fate filled with
high hopes of owning his own newspaper before long
and ranking as the leading journalist in the great
little city made famous by gold and Bret Harte.
He was one of many in New York; he knew that with
his brilliant gifts and the immediate prominence his
new position would give him the future was his to
mould. No man, then or since, has brought so rare
an assortment of talents to the erratic journalism
of San Francisco; not even James King of William,
the murdered editor of the Evening Bulletin.
Perhaps he too would have been murdered had he remained
long enough to own and edit the newspaper of his dreams,
for he had a merciless irony, a fearless spirit, and
an utter contempt for the prejudices of small men.
But for a time at least it looked as if the history
of journalism in San Francisco was to be one of California’s
proudest boasts.
Masters was a practical visionary,
a dreamer whose dreams never confused his metallic
intellect, a stylist who fascinated even the poor
mind forced to express itself in colloquialisms, a
man of immense erudition for his years (he was only
thirty); and he was insatiably interested in the affairs
of the world and in every phase of life. He was
a poet by nature, and a journalist by profession because
he believed the press was destined to become the greatest
power in the country, and he craved not only power
but the utmost opportunity for self-expression.
His character possessed as many antitheses.
He was a natural lover of women and avoided them not
only because he feared entanglements and enervations
but because he had little respect for their brains.
He was, by his Virginian inheritance, if for no simpler
reason, a bon vivant, but the preoccupations and ordinary
conversational subjects of men irritated him, and
he cultivated their society and that of women only
in so far as they were essential to his deeper understanding
of life. His code was noblesse oblige and he privately
damned it as a superstition foisted upon him by his
ancestors. He was sentimental and ironic, passionate
and indifferent, frank and subtle, proud and democratic,
with a warm capacity for friendship and none whatever
for intimacy, a hard worker with a strong taste for
loafing— in the open country, book in hand.
He prided himself upon his iron will and turned uneasily
from the weeds growing among the fine flowers of his
nature.
Such was Langdon Masters when he came
to San Francisco and Madeleine Talbot.