On the Reciprocal influence
of science and education.
That the state of knowledge in any
country will exert a directive influence on the general
system of instruction adopted in it, is a principle
too obvious to require investigation. And it
is equally certain that the tastes and pursuits of
our manhood will bear on them the traces of the earlier
impressions of our education. It is therefore
not unreasonable to suppose that some portion of the
neglect of science in England, may be attributed to
the system of education we pursue. A young man
passes from our public schools to the universities,
ignorant almost of the elements of every branch of
useful knowledge; and at these latter establishments,
formed originally for instructing those who are intended
for the clerical profession, classical and mathematical
pursuits are nearly the sole objects proposed to the
student’s ambition.
Much has been done at one of our universities
during the last fifteen years, to improve the system
of study; and I am confident that there is no one
connected with that body, who will not do me the justice
to believe that, whatever suggestions I may venture
to offer, are prompted by the warmest feelings for
the honour and the increasing prosperity of its institutions.
The ties which connect me with Cambridge are indeed
of no ordinary kind.
Taking it then for granted that our
system of academical education ought to be adapted
to nearly the whole of the aristocracy of the country,
I am inclined to believe that whilst the modifications
I should propose would not be great innovations on
the spirit of our institutions, they would contribute
materially to that important object.
It will be readily admitted, that
a degree conferred by an university, ought to be a
pledge to the public that he who holds it possesses
a certain quantity of knowledge. The progress
of society has rendered knowledge far more various
in its kinds than it used to be; and to meet this
variety in the tastes and inclinations of those who
come to us for instruction, we have, besides the regular
lectures to which all must attend, other sources of
information from whence the students may acquire sound
and varied knowledge in the numerous lectures on chemistry,
geology, botany, history, &c. It is at present
a matter of option with the student, which, and how
many of these courses he shall attend, and such it
should still remain. All that it would be necessary
to add would be, that previously to taking his degree,
each person should be examined by those Professors,
whose lectures he had attended. The pupils should
then be arranged in two classes, according to their
merits, and the names included in these classes should
be printed. I would then propose that no young
man, except his name was found amongst the “List
of Honours,” should be allowed to take his degree,
unless he had been placed in the first class of some
one at least of the courses given by the professors.
But it should still be imperative upon the student
to possess such mathematical knowledge as we usually
require. If he had attained the first rank in
several of these examinations, it is obvious that we
should run no hazard in a little relaxing: the
strictness of his mathematical trial.
If it should be thought preferable,
the sciences might be grouped, and the following subjects
be taken together:—
Modern History.
Laws of England.
Civil Law.
Political Economy.
Applications of Science to Arts and Manufactures.
Chemistry.
Mineralogy.
Geology.
Zoology, including Physiology and Comparative Anatomy.
Botany, including Vegetable Physiology and Anatomy.
One of the great advantages of such
a system would be, that no young person would have
an excuse for not studying, by stating, as is most
frequently done, that the only pursuits followed at
Cambridge, classics and mathematics, are not adapted
either to his taste, or to the wants of his after
life. His friends and relatives would then reasonably
expect every student to have acquired distinction
in some pursuit. If it should be feared
that this plan would lead to too great a diversity
of pursuits in the same individual, a limitation might
be placed upon the number of examinations into which
the same person might be permitted to enter.
It might also be desirable not to restrict the whole
of these examinations to the third year, but to allow
the student to enter on some portion of them in the
first or second year, if he should prefer it.
By such an arrangement, which would
scarcely interfere seriously with our other examinations,
we should, I think, be enabled effectually to keep
pace with the wants of society, and retaining fully
our power and our right to direct the studies of those
who are intended for the church, as well as of those
who aspire to the various offices connected with our
academical institutions; we should, at the same time,
open a field of honourable ambition to multitudes,
who, from the exclusive nature of our present studies,
leave us with but a very limited addition to their
stock of knowledge.
Much more might be said on a subject
so important to the interests of the country, as well
as of our university, but my wish is merely to open
it for our own consideration and discussion.
We have already done so much for the improvement of
our system of instruction, that public opinion will
not reproach us for any unwillingness to alter.
It is our first duty to be well satisfied that we
can improve: such alterations ought only to
be the result of a most mature consideration, and of
a free interchange of sentiments on the subject, in
order that we may condense upon the question the accumulated
judgment of many minds.
It is in some measure to be attributed
to the defects of our system of education, that scientific
knowledge scarcely exists amongst the higher classes
of society. The discussions in the Houses of
Lords or of Commons, which arise on the occurrence
of any subjects connected with science, sufficiently
prove this fact, which, if I had consulted the extremely
limited nature of my personal experience, I should,
perhaps, have doubted.