What has been already said will almost
of itself sufficiently show how an oligarchy ought
to be founded; for he who would frame such a state
should have in his view a democracy to oppose it; for
every species of oligarchy should be founded on principles
diametrically opposite to some species of democracy.
The first and best-framed oligarchy
is that which approaches near to what we call a free
state; in which there ought to be two different census,
the one high, the other low: from those who are
within the latter the ordinary officers of the state
ought to be chosen; from the former the supreme magistrates:
nor should any one be excluded from a part of the
administration who was within the census; which should
be so regulated that the commonalty who are included
in it should by means thereof be superior to those
who have no share in the government; for those who
are to have the management of public affairs ought
always to be chosen out of the better sort of the people.
Much in the same manner ought that oligarchy to be
established which is next in order: but as to
that which is most opposite to a pure democracy, and
approaches nearest to a dynasty and a tyranny, as it
is of all others the worst, so it requires the greatest
care and caution to preserve it: for as bodies
of sound and healthy constitutions and ships which
are well manned and well found for sailing can bear
many injuries without perishing, while a diseased
body or a leaky ship with an indifferent crew cannot
support the [1321a] least shock; so the worst-established
governments want most looking after. A number
of citizens is the preservation of a democracy; for
these are opposed to those rights which are founded
in rank: on the contrary, the preservation of
an oligarchy depends upon the due regulation of the
different orders in the society.
|