There are four kinds of democracies.
The best is that which is composed of those first
in order, as we have already said, and this also is
the most ancient of any. I call that the first
which every one would place so, was he to divide the
people; for the best part of these are the husbandmen.
We see, then, that a democracy may be framed where
the majority live by tillage or pasturage; for, as
their property is but small, they will not be at leisure
perpetually to hold public assemblies, but will be
continually employed in following their own business,
not having otherwise the means of living; nor will
they be desirous of what another enjoys, but will
rather like to follow their own business than meddle
with state affairs and accept the offices of government,
which will be attended with no great profit; for the
major part of mankind are rather desirous of riches
than honour (a proof of this is, that they submitted
to the tyrannies in ancient times, and do now submit
to the oligarchies, if no one hinders them in their
usual occupations, or deprives them of their property;
for some of them soon get rich, others are removed
from poverty); besides, their having the right of
election and calling their magistrates to account
for their conduct when they come out of office, will
satisfy their desire of honours, if any of them entertain
that passion: for in some states, though the
commonalty have not the right of electing the magistrates,
yet it is vested in part of that body chosen to represent
them: and it is sufficient for the people at large
to possess the deliberative power: and this ought
to be considered as a species of democracy; such was
that formerly at Mantinsea: for which reason
it is proper for the democracy we have been now treating
of to have a power (and it has been usual for them
to have it) of censuring their magistrates when out
of office, and sitting in judgment upon all causes:
but that the chief magistrates should be elected, and
according to a certain census, which should vary with
the rank of their office, or else not by a census,
but according to their abilities for their respective
appointments. A state thus constituted must be
well constituted; for the magistracies will be always
filled with the best men with the approbation of the
people; who will not envy their superiors: and
these and the nobles should be content with this part
in the administration; for they will not be governed
by their inferiors. They will be also careful
to use their power with moderation, as there are others
to whom full power is delegated to censure their conduct;
for it is very serviceable to the state to have them
dependent upon others, and not to be permitted to do
whatsoever they choose; for with such a liberty there
would be no check to that evil particle there is in
every one: therefore it is [1319a] necessary
and most for the benefit of the state that the offices
thereof should be filled by the principal persons
in it, whose characters are unblemished, and that
the people are not oppressed. It is now evident
that this is the best species of democracy, and on
what account; because the people are such and have
such powers as they ought to have. To establish
a democracy of husbandmen some of those laws which
were observed in many ancient states are universally
useful; as, for instance, on no account to permit
any one to possess more than a certain quantity of
land, or within a certain distance from the city.
Formerly also, in some states, no one was allowed to
sell their original lot of land. They also mention
a law of one Oxylus, which forbade any one to add
to their patrimony by usury. We ought also to
follow the law of the Aphutaeans, as useful to direct
us in this particular we are now speaking of; for
they having but very little ground, while they were
a numerous people, and at the same time were all husbandmen,
did not include all their lands within the census,
but divided them in such a manner that, according
to the census, the poor had more power than the rich.
Next to the commonalty of husbandmen is one of shepherds
and herdsmen; for they have many things in common
with them, and, by their way of life, are excellently
qualified to make good soldiers, stout in body, and
able to continue in the open air all night. The
generality of the people of whom other democracies
are composed are much worse than these; for their lives
are wretched nor have they any business with virtue
in anything they do; these are your mechanics, your
exchange-men, and hired servants; as all these sorts
of men frequent the exchange and the citadel, they
can readily attend the public assembly; whereas the
husbandmen, being more dispersed in the country, cannot
so easily meet together-nor are they equally desirous
of doing it with these others! When a country
happens to be so situated that a great part of the
land lies at a distance from the city, there it is
easy to establish a good democracy or a free state
for the people in general will be obliged to live in
the country; so that it will be necessary in such
a democracy, though there may be an exchange-mob at
hand, never to allow a legal assembly without the
inhabitants of the country attend. We have shown
in what manner the first and best democracy ought
to be established, and it will be equally evident
as to the rest, for from these we [1319b] should proceed
as a guide, and always separate the meanest of the
people from the rest. But the last and worst,
which gives to every citizen without distinction a
share in every part of the administration, is what
few citizens can bear, nor is it easy to preserve
for any long time, unless well supported by laws and
manners. We have already noticed almost every
cause that can destroy either this or any other state.
Those who have taken the lead in such a democracy
have endeavoured to support it, and make the people
powerful by collecting together as many persons as
they could and giving them their freedom, not only
legitimately but naturally born, and also if either
of their parents were citizens, that is to say, if
either their father or mother; and this method is
better suited to this state than any other: and
thus the demagogues have usually managed. They
ought, however, to take care, and do this no longer
than the common people are superior to the nobles
and those of the middle rank, and then stop; for,
if they proceed still further, they will make the state
disorderly, and the nobles will ill brook the power
of the common people, and be full of resentment against
it; which was the cause of an insurrection at Cyrene:
for a little evil is overlooked, but when it becomes
a great one it strikes the eye. It is, moreover,
very-useful in such a state to do as Clisthenes did
at Athens, when he was desirous of increasing the
power of the people, and as those did who established
the democracy in Cyrene; that is, to institute many
tribes and fraternities, and to make the religious
rites of private persons few, and those common; and
every means is to be contrived to associate and blend
the people together as much as possible; and that
all former customs be broken through. Moreover,
whatsoever is practised in a tyranny seems adapted
to a democracy of this species; as, for instance,
the licentiousness of the slaves, the women, and the
children; for this to a certain degree is useful in
such a state; and also to overlook every one’s
living as they choose; for many will support such
a government: for it is more agreeable to many
to live without any control than as prudence would
direct.