Having established these points, we
proceed next to consider whether one form of government
only should be established, or more than one; and
if more, how many, and of what sort, and what are the
differences between them. The form of government
is the ordering and regulating of the city, and all
the offices in it, particularly those wherein the
supreme power is lodged; and this power is always possessed
by the administration; but the administration itself
is that particular form of government which is established
in any state: thus in a democracy the supreme
power is lodged in the whole people; on the contrary,
in an oligarchy it is in the hands of a few.
We say then, that the form of government in these
states is different, and we shall find the same thing
hold good in others. Let us first determine for
whose sake a city is established; and point out the
different species of rule which man may submit to
in social life.
I have already mentioned in my treatise
on the management of a family, and the power of the
master, that man is an animal naturally formed for
society, and that therefore, when he does not want
any foreign assistance, he will of his own accord
desire to live with others; not but that mutual advantage
induces them to it, as far as it enables each person
to live more agreeably; and this is indeed the great
object not only to all in general, but also to each
individual: but it is not merely matter of choice,
but they join in society also, even that they may
be able to live, which probably is not without some
share of merit, and they also support civil society,
even for the sake of preserving life, without they
are grievously overwhelmed with the miseries of it:
for it is very evident that men will endure many calamities
for the sake of living, as being something naturally
sweet and desirable. It is easy to point out
the different modes of government, and we have already
settled them in our exoteric discourses. The
power of the master, though by nature equally serviceable,
both to the master and to the slave, yet nevertheless
has for its object the benefit of the master, while
the benefit of the slave arises accidentally; for
if the slave is destroyed, the power of the master
is at an end: but the authority which a man has
over his wife, and children, and his family, which
we call domestic government, is either for the benefit
of those who are under subjection, or else for the
common benefit of the whole: but its particular
object is the benefit of the governed, as we see in
other arts; in physic, for instance, and the gymnastic
exercises, wherein, if any benefit [1279a] arise to
the master, it is accidental; for nothing forbids the
master of the exercises from sometimes being himself
one of those who exercises, as the steersman is always
one of the sailors; but both the master of the exercises
and the steersman consider the good of those who are
under their government. Whatever good may happen
to the steersman when he is a sailor, or to the master
of the exercises when he himself makes one at the
games, is not intentional, or the object of their
power; thus in all political governments which are
established to preserve and defend the equality of
the citizens it is held right to rule by turns.
Formerly, as was natural, every one expected that
each of his fellow-citizens should in his turn serve
the public, and thus administer to his private good,
as he himself when in office had done for others;
but now every one is desirous of being continually
in power, that he may enjoy the advantage which he
makes of public business and being in office; as if
places were a never-failing remedy for every complaint,
and were on that account so eagerly sought after.
It is evident, then, that all those
governments which have a common good in view are rightly
established and strictly just, but those who have
in view only the good of the rulers are all founded
on wrong principles, and are widely different from
what a government ought to be, for they are tyranny
over slaves, whereas a city is a community of freemen.