Since then we propose to inquire what
civil society is of all others best for those who
have it in their power to live entirely as they wish,
it is necessary to examine into the polity of those
states which are allowed to be well governed; and
if there should be any others which some persons have
described, and which appear properly regulated, to
note what is right and useful in them; and when we
point out wherein they have failed, let not this be
imputed to an affectation of wisdom, for it is because
there are great defects in all those which are already
’established, that I have been induced to undertake
this work. We will begin with that part of the
subject which naturally presents itself first to our
consideration. The members of every state must
of necessity have all things in common, or some things
common, and not others, or nothing at all common.
To have nothing in common is evidently impossible,
for society itself is one species of [1261a] community;
and the first thing necessary thereunto is a common
place of habitation, namely the city, which must be
one, and this every citizen must have a share in.
But in a government which is to be well founded, will
it be best to admit of a community in everything which
is capable thereof, or only in some particulars, but
in others not? for it is possible that the citizens
may have their wives, and children, and goods in common,
as in Plato’s Commonwealth; for in that Socrates
affirms that all these particulars ought to be so.
Which then shall we prefer? the custom which is already
established, or the laws which are proposed in that
treatise?
|