‘Come YE out and be YE separate.’
Arthur Berkeley’s London lodgings
were wonderfully snug and comfortable for the second
floor of a second-rate house in a small retired side
street near the Embankment at Chelsea. He had
made the most of the four modest little rooms, with
his quick taste and his deft, cunning fingers:—four
rooms, or rather boxes, one might almost call them;
a bedroom each for himself and the Progenitor; a wee
sitting-room for meals and music—the two
Berkeleys would doubtless as soon have gone without
the one as the other; and a tiny study where Arthur
might work undisturbed at his own desk upon his new
and original magnum opus, destined to form the great
attraction of the coming season at the lately-opened
Ambiguities Theatre. Things had prospered well
with the former Oxford curate during the last twelve-month.
His cantata at Leeds had proved a wonderful success,
and had finally induced him to remove to London, and
take to composing as a regular profession. He
had his qualms about it, to be sure, as one who had
put his hand to the plough and then turned back; he
did not feel quite certain in his own mind how far
he was justified in giving up the more spiritual for
the more worldly calling; but natures like Arthur
Berkeley’s move rather upon passing feeling
than upon deeper sentiment; and had he not ample ground,
he asked himself, for this reconsideration of the
monetary position? He had the Progenitor’s
happiness to insure before thinking of the possible
injury to his non-existent parishioners. If he
was doing Whippingham Parva or Norton-cum-Sutton out
of an eloquent and valuable potential rector, if he
was depriving the Church in the next half-century
of a dignified and portly prospective archdeacon,
he is at least making his father’s last days
brighter and more comfortable than his early ones
had ever been. And then, was not music, too,
in its own way, a service, a liturgy, a worship?
Surely he could do higher good to men’s souls—as
they call them—to whatever little spark
of nobler and better fire there might lurk within
those dull clods of common clay he saw all around him—by
writing such a work as his Leeds cantata, than by stringing
together for ever those pretty centos of seventeenth-century
conceits and nineteenth-century doubts or hesitations
which he was accustomed to call his sermons!
Whatever came of it, he must give up the miserable
pittance of a curacy, and embrace the career open to
the musical talents.
So he fitted up his little Chelsea
rooms in his own economically sumptuous fashion with
some bits of wall paper, a few jugs and vases, and
an etching or two after Meissonier; planted the Progenitor
down comfortably in a large easy-chair, with a melodious
fiddle before him; and set to work himself to do what
he could towards elevating the British stage and pocketing
a reasonable profit on his own account from that familiar
and ever-rejuvenescent process. He was quite
in earnest, now, about producing a totally new effect
of his own; and believing in his work, as a good workman
ought to do, he wrought at it indefatigably and well
in the retirement of a second-pair back, overlooking
a yardful of fluttering clothes, and a fine skyline
vista of bare, yellowish brick chimneys.
‘What part are you working at
to-day, Artie?’ said the old shoemaker, looking
over his son’s shoulder at the blank music paper
before him. ‘Quartette of Biological Professors,
eh?’
‘Yes, father,’ Berkeley
answered with a smile. ’How do you think
it runs now?’ and he hummed over a few lines
of his own words, set with a quaint lilt to his own
inimitable and irresistible music:—
And though in unanimous chorus
We mourn that from ages before
us
No single enaliosaurus
To-day
should survive,
Yet joyfully may we bethink
us,
With the earliest mammal to
link us,
We still have the ornithorhyncus
Extant
and alive!
’How do you think the score
does for that, father, eh? Catching air rather,
isn’t it?’
’Not a better air in the whole
piece, Artie; but, my boy, who do you think will ever
understand the meaning of the words. The gods
themselves won’t know what you’re driving
at.’
’But I’m going to strike
out a new line, Daddie dear. I’m not going
to play to the gallery; I mean to play to the stalls
and boxes.’
‘Was there ever such a born
aristocrat as this young parson is!’ cried the
old man, lifting up both his hands with a playful gesture
of mock-deprecation. ’He’s hopeless!
He’s terrible! He’s incorrigible!
Why, you unworthy son of a respectable Paddington shoemaker,
if even the intelligent British artizans in the gallery
don’t understand you, how the dickens do you
suppose the oiled and curled Assyrian bulls in the
stalls and boxes will have a glimmering idea of what
you’re driving at? The supposition’s
an insult to the popular intelligence—in
other words, to me, sir, your Progenitor.’
Berkeley laughed. ‘I don’t
know about that, father,’ he said, holding up
the page of manuscript music at arm’s length
admiringly before him; ’but I do know one thing:
this comic opera of mine is going to be a triumphant
success.’
’So I’ve thought ever
since you began it, Artie. You see, my boy, there’s
a great many points in its favour. In the first
place you can write your own libretto, or whatever
you call it; and you know I’ve always held that
though that Wagner man was wrong in practice—a
most inflated thunder-bomb, his Lohengrin—yet
he was right in theory, right in theory, Artie; every
composer ought to be his own poet. Well, then,
again, you’ve got a certain peculiar vein of
humour of your own, a kind of delicate semi-serious
burlesque turn about you that’s quite original,
both in writing and in composing; you’re a humourist
in verse and a humourist in music, that’s the
long and the short of it. Now, you’ve hit
upon a fresh lode of dramatic ore in this opera of
yours, and if my judgment goes for anything, it’ll
bring the house down the first evening. I’m
a bit of a critic, Artie; by hook or by crook, you
know, paper or money, I’ve heard every good
opera, comic or serious, that’s been given in
London these last thirty years, and I flatter myself
I know something by this time about operatic criticism.’
‘You’re wrong about Wagner,
father,’ said Arthur, still glancing with paternal
partiality at his sheet of manuscript: ’Lohengrin’s
a very fine work, a grand work, I assure you.
I won’t let you run it down. But, barring
that, I think you’re pretty nearly right in
your main judgment. I’m not modest, and
it strikes me somehow that I’ve invented a genre.
That’s about what it comes to.’
’If you’d confine yourself
to your native tongue, Mr. Parson, your ignorant
old father might have some chance of agreeing or disagreeing
with you; but as he doesn’t even know what the
thingumbob you say you’ve invented may happen
to be, he can’t profitably continue the discussion
of that subject. However, my only fear is that
you may perhaps be writing above the heads of the
audience. Not in the music, Artie; they can’t
fail to catch that; it rings in one’s head like
the song of a hedge warbler—tirree, tirree,
lu-lu-lu, la-la, tirree, tu-whit, tu-whoo, tra-la-la—but
in the words and the action. I’m half afraid
that’ll be over their heads, even in the gallery.
What do you think you’ll finally call it?’
’I’m hesitating, Daddy,
between “Evolution” and “The Primate
of Fiji.” Which do you recommend—tell
me?’
‘The Primate, by all means,’
said the old man gaily. ’And you still
mean to open with the debate in the Fijian Parliament
on the Deceased Grandmother’s Second Cousin
Bill?’
’No, I don’t, Daddy.
I’ve written a new first scene this week, in
which the President of the Board of Trade remonstrates
with the mermaids on their remissness in sending
their little ones to the Fijian Board Schools, in
order to receive primary instruction in the art of
swimming. I’ve got a capital chorus of mermaids
to balance the other chorus of Biological Professors
on the Challenger Expedition. I consider it’s
a happy cross between Ariosto and Aristophanes.
If you like, I’ll give you the score, and read
over the words to you.’ ‘Do,’
said the old man, settling himself down in comfort
in his son’s easy-chair, and assuming the sternest
air of an impartial critic. Arthur Berkeley read
on dramatically, in his own clever airy fashion,
suiting accent and gesture to the subject matter through
the whole first three acts of that exquisitely humorous
opera, the Primate of Fiji. Sometimes he hummed
the tune over to himself as he went; sometimes he
played a few notes upon his flute by way of striking
the key-note; sometimes he rose from his seat in his
animation, and half acted the part he was reading with
almost unconscious and spontaneous mimicry. He
read through the famous song of the President of the
Local Government Board, that everybody has since heard
played by every German band at the street corners;
through the marvellously catching chorus of the superannuated
tide-waiters; through the culminating dialogue between
the London Missionary Society’s Agent and the
Hereditary Grand Sacrificer to the King of Fiji.
Of course the recital lacked everything of the scenery
and dresses that give it so much vogue upon the stage;
but it had at least the charmingly suggestive music,
the wonderful linking of sound to sense, the droll
and inimitable intermixture of the plausible and the
impossible which everybody has admired and laughed
at in the acted piece.
The old shoemaker listened in breathless
silence, keeping his eye fixed steadily all the time
upon the clean copy of the score. Only once he
made a wry face to himself, and that was in the chorus
to the debate in the Fijian Parliament on the proposal
to leave off the practice of obligatory cannibalism.
The conservative party were of opinion that if you
began by burying instead of eating your deceased wife,
you might end by the atrocious practice of marrying
your deceased wife’s sister; and they opposed
the revolutionary measure in that well known refrain:—
Of change like this we’re
naturally chary,
Nolumus leges Fijiae mutari.
That passage evidently gave the Progenitor deep pain.
‘Stick to your own language,
my boy,’ he murmured; ’stick to your own
language. The Latin may be very fine, but the
gallery wil never understand it.’ However,
when Arthur finished at last, he drew a long breath,
and laid down the roll of manuscript with an involuntary
little cry of half-stifled applause.
‘Artie,’ he said rising
from the chair slowly, ’Artie, that’s not
so bad for a parson, I can tell you. I hope the
Archbishop won’t be tempted to cite you for
displaying an amount of originality unworthy of your
cloth.’
‘Father,’ said Arthur,
suddenly, after a short pause, with a tinge of pensiveness
in his tone that was not usual with him, in speaking
at least; ’Father, I often think I ought never
to have become a parson at all.’
‘Well, my boy,’ said the
old man, looking up at him sharply with his keen eyes,
’I knew that long ago. You’ve never
really believed in the thing, and you oughtn’t
to have gone in for it from the very beginning.
It was the music, and the dresses, and the decorations
that enticed you, Artie, and not the doctrine.’
Arthur turned towards him with a pained
expression. ‘Father,’ he said, half
reproachfully, ’Father, dear father, dou’t
talk to me like that. Don’t think I’m
so shallow or so dishonest as to subscribe to opinions
I don’t believe in. It’s a curious
thing to say, a curious thing in this unbelieving
age, and I’m half ashamed to say it, even to
you; but do you know, father, I really do believe it:
in my very heart of hearts, I fancy I believe every
word of it.’
The old man listened to him compassionately
and tenderly, as a woman listens to the fears and
troubles of a little child. To him, that plain
confession of faith was, in truth, a wonder and a
stumbling-block. Good, simple-hearted, easy-going,
logical-minded, sceptical shoemaker that he was, with
his head all stuffed full of Malthus, and John Stuart
Mill, and political economy, and the hard facts of
life and science, how could he hope to understand the
complex labyrinth of metaphysical thinking, and childlike
faith, and aesthetic attraction, and historical authority,
which made a sensitive man like Arthur Berkeley, in
his wayward, half-serious, emotional fashion, turn
back lovingly and regretfully to the fair old creed
that his father had so long deserted? How strange
that Artie, a full-grown male person, with all the
learning of the schools behind him, should relapse
at last into these childish and exploded mediaeval
superstitions! How incredible that, after having
been brought up from his babyhood upward on the strong
meat of the agnostic philosophers, he should fall
back in his manhood on the milk for babes administered
to him by orthodox theology! The simple-minded
old sceptic could hardly credit it, now that Arthur
told him so with his own lips, though he had more
than once suspected it when he heard him playing sacred
music with that last touch of earnestness in his execution
which only the sincerest conviction and most intimate
realisation of its import can ever give. Ah well,
ah well, good sceptical old shoemaker; there are perhaps
more things in heaven and earth and in the deep soul
of man than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Still, though the avowal shocked and
disappointed him a little, the old man could not find
it in his heart to say one word of sorrow or disapproval,
far less of ridicule or banter, to his dearly loved
boy. He felt instinctively, what Herbert Le Breton
could not feel, that this sentimental tendency of
his son’s, as he thought it, lay far too deep
and seemed far too sacred for mere argument or common
discussion. ‘Perhaps,’ he said to
himself softly, ’Artie’s emotional side
has got the better of his intellectual. I brought
him up without telling him any thing of these things,
except negatively, and by way of warning against superstitious
tendencies; and when he went to Oxford, and saw the
doctrines tricked out in all the authority of a great
hierarchy, with its cathedrals, and chapels, and choirs,
and altars, and robes, and fal-lal finery, it got
the better of him; got the better of him, very naturally.
Artie’s a cleverer fellow than his old father—had
more education, and so on; and I’m fond of him,
very fond of him; but his logical faculty isn’t
quite straight, somehow: he lets his feelings
have too much weight and prominence against his calmer
reason! I can easily understand how, with his
tastes and leanings, the clericals should have managed
to get a hold over him. The clericals are such
insinuating cunning fellows. A very impressionable
boy Artie was, always; the poetical temperament and
the artistic temperament always is impressionable,
I suppose; but shoemaking certainly does develop the
logical faculties. Seems as though the logical
faculties were situated in the fore-part of the brain,
as they mark them out on the phrenological heads;
and the leaning forward that gives us the shoemaker’s
forehead must tend to enlarge them—give
them plenty of room to expand and develop!’
Saying which thing to himself musingly, the father
took his son’s hand gently in his, and only
smoothed it quietly as he looked deep into Arthur’s
eyes, without uttering a single word.
As for Arthur Berkeley, he sat silent,
too, half averting his face from his father’s
gaze, and feeling a little blush of shame upon his
cheek at having been surprised unexpectedly into such
an unwonted avowal. How could he ever expect
his father to understand the nature of his feelings!
To him, good old man that he was, all these things
were just matters of priestcraft and obscurantism—fables
invented by the ecclesiastical mind as a means of
getting fat livings and comfortable deaneries out
of the public pocket. And, indeed, Arthur was
well accustomed at Oxford to keeping his own opinions
to himself on such subjects. What chance of sympathy
or response was there for such a man as he in that
coldly critical and calmly deliberative learned society?
Not, of course, that all Oxford was wholly given over
even then to extreme agnosticism. There were High
Churchmen, and Low Churchmen, and Broad Churchmen
enough, to be sure: men learned in the Fathers,
and the Canons, and the Acts of the General Councils;
men ready to argue on the intermediate state, or on
the three witnesses, or on the heretical nature of
the Old Catholic schism; men prepared with minute
dogmatic opinions upon every conceivable or inconceivable
point of abstract theology. There were people
who could trace the Apostolic succession of the old
Cornish bishops, and people who could pronounce authoritatively
upon the exact distinction between justification and
remission of sins. But for all these things Arthur
Berkeley cared nothing. Where, then, among those
learned exegetical theologians, was there room for
one whose belief was a matter, not of reason and argument,
but of feeling and of sympathy? He did not want
to learn what the Council of Trent had said about
such and such a dogma; he wanted to be conscious of
an inner truth, to find the world permeated by an informing
righteousness, to know himself at one with the inner
essence of the entire universe. And though he
could never feel sure whether it was all illusion
or not, he had hungered and thirsted after believing
it, till, as he told his father timidly that day, he
actually did believe it somehow in his heart of hearts.
Let us not seek to probe too deeply into those inner
recesses, whose abysmal secrets are never perfectly
clear even to the introspective eyes of the conscious
self-dissector himself.
After a pause Arthur spoke again.
He spoke this time in a very low voice, as one afraid
to open his soul too much, even to his father.
‘Dear, dear father,’ he said, releasing
his hand softly, ’you don’t quite understand
what I mean about it. It isn’t because I
don’t believe, or try to believe, or hope I
believe, that I think I ought never to have become
a parson. In my way, as in a glass, darkly, I
do strive my best to believe, though perhaps my belief
is hardly more in its way than Ernest Le Breton’s
unbelieving. I do want to think that this great
universe we see around us isn’t all a mistake
and an abortion. I want to find a mind and an
order and a purpose in it; and, perhaps because I
want it, I make myself believe that I have really
found it. In that hope and belief, with the ultimate
object of helping on whatever is best and truest in
the world, I took orders. But I feel now that
it was an error for me. I’m not the right
man to make a parson. There are men who are born
for that rôle; men who know how to conduct themselves
in it decently and in seemly fashion; men who can
quietly endure all its restraints, and can fairly
rise to the height of all its duties. But I can’t.
I was intended for something lighter and less onerous
than that. If I stop in the Church I shall do
no good to myself or to it; if I come out of it, I
shall make both parties freer, and shall be able to
do more good in my own generation. And so, father,
for the very same reasons that made me go into it,
I mean to come out again. Not in any quarrel
with it, nor as turning my back upon it, but just
as the simple acknowledgment of a mistaken calling.
It wouldn’t be seemly, for example, for a parson
to write comic operas. But I feel I can do more
good by writing comic operas than by talking dogmatically
about things I hardly understand to people who hardly
understand me. So before I get this opera acted
I mean to leave off my white tie, and be known in
future, henceforth and for ever, as plain Arthur Berkeley.’
The old shoemaker listened in respectful
silence. ’It isn’t for me, Artie,’
he said, as his son finished, ’to stand between
a man and his conscience. As John Stuart Mill
says in his essay on “Liberty,” we must
allow full play to every man’s individuality.
Wonderful man, John Stuart Mill; I understand his
grandfather was a shoemaker. Well, I won’t
talk with you about the matter of conviction; but I
never wanted you to be a parson, and I shall feel all
the happier myself when you’ve ceased to be
one.’
‘And I,’ said Arthur,
’shall feel all the freer; but if I had been
able to remain where I was, I should have felt all
the worthier, for all that.’