On the Effect of Machinery in Reducing
the Demand for Labour
404. One of the objections most
frequently urged against machinery is, that it has
a tendency to supersede much of the hand labour which
was previously employed; and in fact unless a machine
diminished the labour necessary to make an article,
it could never come into use. But if it have
that effect, its owner, in order to extend the sale
of his produce, will be obliged to undersell his competitors;
this will induce them also to introduce the new machine,
and the effect of this competition will soon cause
the article to fall, until the profits on capital,
under the new system, shall be reduced to the same
rate as under the old. Although, therefore, the
use of machinery has at first a tendency to throw
labour out of employment, yet the increased demand
consequent upon the reduced price, almost immediately
absorbs a considerable portion of that labour, and
perhaps, in some cases, the whole of what would otherwise
have been displaced.
That the effect of a new machine is
to diminish the labour required for the production
of the same quantity of manufactured commodities may
beclearlyperceived, byimaginingasociety, inwhichoccupation
are not divided, each man himself manufacturing all
the articles he consumes. Supposing each individual
to labour during ten hours daily, one of which is
devoted to making shoes, it is evident that if any
tool or machine be introduced, by the use ofwhich
his shoes can be made in halfthe usual time, then
each member ofthe community will enjoy the same comforts
as before by only nine and one-half hours’ labour.
405. If, therefore, we wish to
prove that the total quantity oflabourisnot diminished
by the introduction of machines, we must have recourse
to some other principle of our nature. But the
same motive which urges a man to activity will become
additionally powerful, when he finds his comforts
procured with diminished labour; and in such circumstances,
it is probable, that many would employ the time thus
redeemed in contriving new tools for other branches
of their occupations. He who has habitually worked
ten hours a day, will employ the half hour saved by
the new machine in gratifying some other want; and
as each new machine adds to these gratifications,
new luxuries will open to his view, which continued
enjoyment will as surely render necessary to his happiness.
406. In countries where occupations
are divided, and where the division of labour is practised,
the ultimate consequence of improvements in machinery
is almost invariably to cause a greater demand for
labour. Frequently the new labour requires, at
its commencement, a higher degree of skill than the
old; and, unfortunately, the class of persons driven
out of the old employment are not always qualified
for the new one; so that a certain interval must elapse
before the whole of their labour is wanted. This,
for a time, produces considerable suffering amongst
the working classes; and it is of great importance
for their happiness that they should be aware of these
effects, and be enabled to foresee them at an early
period, in order to diminish, as much as possible,
the injury resulting from them.
407. One very important enquiry
which this subject presents is the question whether
it is more for the interest of the working classes,
that improved machinery should be so perfect as to
defy the competition of hand labour; and that they
should thus be at once driven out of the trade by
it; or be gradually forced to quit it by the slow
and successive advances of the machine? The suffering
which arises from a quick transition is undoubtedly
more intense; but it is also much less permanent than
that which results from the slower process: and
if the competition is perceived to be perfectly hopeless,
the workman will at once set himself to learn a new
department of his art. On the other hand, although
new machinery causes an increased demand for skill
in those who make and repair it, and in those who
first superintend its use; yet there are other cases
in which it enables children and inferior workmen
to execute work that previously required greater skill.
In such circumstances, even though the increased demand
for the article, produced by its diminished price,
should speedily give occupation to all who were before
employed, yet the very diminution of the skill required,
would open a wider field of competition amongst the
working classes themselves.
That machines do not, even at their
first introduction, invariably throw human labour
out of employment, must be admitted; and it has been
maintained, by persons very competent to form an opinion
on the subject, that they never produce that effect.
The solution of this question depends on facts, which,
unfortunately, have not yet been collected: and
the circumstance of our not possessing the data necessary
for the full examination of so important a subject,
supplies an additional reason for impressing, upon
the minds of all who are interested in such enquiries,
the importance of procuring accurate registries, at
various times, of the number of persons employed in
particular branches of manufacture, of the number
of machines used by them. and of the wages they receive.
408. In relation to the enquiry
just mentioned, I shall offer some remarks upon the
facts within my knowledge; and only regret that those
which I can support by numerical statement are so few.
When the crushing mill, used in Cornwall and other
mining countries, superseded the labour of a great
number of young women, who worked very hard in breaking
ores with flat hammers, no distress followed.
The reason of this appears to have been, that the
proprietors of the mines, having one portion of their
capital released by the superior cheapness of the process
executed by the mills, found it their interest to apply
more labour to other operations. The women, disengaged
from mere drudgery, were thus profitably employed
in dressing the ores, a work which required skill
and judgement in the selection.
409. The increased production
arising from alterations in the machinery, or from
improved modes of using it, appears from the following
table. A machine called in the cotton manufacture
a ‘stretcher’, worked by one man, produced
as follows:
Year; Pounds of cotton spun; Roving wages per
score; Rate of earning per week
s.
d. s. d.
1810 400 1 31/2 25 10(1*) 1811 600 0
10 25 0 1813 850 0 9 31 101/2 1823 1000 0 71/2
31 3
The same man working at another stretcher,
the roving a little finer, produced,
1823 900 0 71/2 28 11/2 1825 1000 0 7
27 6 1827 1200 0 6 30 0 1832 1200 0 6 30 0
In this instance, production has gradually
increased until, at the end of twenty-two years, three
times as much work is done as at the commencement,
although the manual labour employed remains the same.
The weekly earnings of the workmen have not fluctuated
very much, and appear, on the whole, to have advanced:
but it would be imprudent to push too far reasonings
founded upon a single instance.
410. The produce of 480 spindles
of ‘mule yarn spinning’, at different
periods, was as follows:
Year; Hanks about 40 to the pound;
Wages per thousand (s. d.)
1806; 6668; 9 2 1823; 8000; 6 3
1832; 10,000; 3 8
411. The subjoined view of the
state of weaving by hand- and by power-looms, at Stockport,
in the years 1822 and 1832, is taken from an enumeration
of the machines contained in 65 factories, and was
collected for the purpose of being given in evidence
before a Committee of the House of Commons.
In 1822 In 1832
Hand-loom weavers 2800 800 2000 decrease
Persons using power-looms 657 3059 2402 increase
Persons to dress the warp 98 388 290 increase
Total persons employed 3555 4247 692 increase
Power-looms 1970 9177 8207 increase
During this period, the number of
hand-looms in employment has diminished to less than
one-third, whilst that of power-looms has increased
to more than five times its former amount. The
total number of workmen has increased about one-third;
but the amount of manufactured goods (supposing each
power-loom to do only the work of three hand-looms)
is three and a half times as large as it was before.
412. In considering this increase
of employment, it must be admitted, that the two thousand
persons thrown out of work are not exactly of the
same class as those called into employment by the
power-looms. A hand-weaver must possess bodily
strength, which is not essential for a person attending
a power-loom; consequently, women and young persons
of both sexes, from fifteen to seventeen years of
age, find employment in power-loom factories.
This, however, would be a very limited view of the
employment arising from the introduction of power-looms:
the skill called into action in building the new factories,
in constructing the new machinery, in making the steam-engines
to drive it, and in devising improvements in the structure
of the looms, as well as in regulating the economy
of the establishment, is of a much higher order than
that which it had assisted in superseding; and if
we possessed any means of measuring this, it would
probably be found larger in amount. Nor, in this
view of the subject, must we omit the fact, that although
hand-looms would have increased in number if those
moved by steam had not been invented, yet it is the
cheapness of the article manufactured by power-looms
which has caused this great extension of their employment,
and that by diminishing the price of one article of
commerce, we always call into additional activity the
energy of those who produce others. It appears
that the number of hand-looms in use in England and
Scotland in 1830, was about 240,000; nearly the same
number existed in the year 1820: whereas the
number of power-looms which, in 1830, was 55,000, had,
in 1820, been 14,000. When it is considered that
each of these powerlooms did as much work as three
worked by hand, the increased producing power was
equal to that of 123,000 hand-looms. During the
whole of this period the wages and employment of hand-loom
weavers have been very precarious.
413. Increased intelligence amongst
the working classes, may enable them to foresee some
of those improvements which are likely for a time
to affect the value of their labour; and the assistance
of savings banks and friendly societies, (the advantages
of which can never be too frequently, or too strongly,
pressed upon their attention), may be of some avail
in remedying the evil: but it may be useful also
to suggest to them, that a diversity of employments
amongst the members of one family will tend, in some
measure, to mitigate the privations which arise from
fluctuation in the value of labour.
Notes:
1. In 1810, the workman’s
wages were guaranteed not to be less than 26s.