In two months from the publication
of the first edition of this volume, three thousand
copies were in the hands of the public. Very
little was spent in advertisements; the booksellers,
instead of aiding, impeded its sale; * it formed no
part of any popular series and yet the public, in
a few weeks, purchased the whole edition. Some
small part of this success, perhaps, was due to the
popular exposition of those curious processes which
are carried on in our workshops, and to the endeavour
to take a short view of the general principles which
direct the manufactories of the country. But
the chief reason was the commanding attraction of
the subject, and the increasing desire to become acquainted
with the pursuits and interests of that portion of
the people which has recently acquired so large an
accession of political influence.
[Footnote: I had good evidence
of this fact from various quarters; and being desirous
of verifying it, I myself applied for a copy at the
shop of a bookseller of respectability, who is probably
not aware that he refused to procure one even for
its author.]
A greater degree of attention than
I had expected has been excited by what I have stated
in the first edition, respecting the ‘Book-trade’.
Until I had commenced the chapter, ’On the separate
cost of each process of a manufacture’, I had
no intention of alluding to that subject: but
the reader will perceive that I have throughout this
volume, wherever I could, employed as illustrations,
objects of easy access to the reader; and, in accordance
with that principle, I selected the volume itself.
When I arrived at the chapter, ’On combinations
of masters against the public’, I was induced,
for the same reason, to expose a combination connected
with literature, which, in my opinion, is both morally
and politically wrong. I entered upon this enquiry
without the slightest feeling of hostility to that
trade, nor have I any wish unfavourable to it; but
I think a complete reform in its system would add
to its usefulness and respectability. As the
subject of that chapter has been much discussed, I
have thought it right to take a view of the various
arguments which have been advanced, and to offer my
own opinion respecting their validity—and
there I should have left the subject, content to allow
my general character to plead for me against insinuations
respecting my motives—but as the remarks
of some of my critics affect the character of another
person, I think it but just to state circumstances
which will clearly disprove them.
Mr Fellowes, of Ludgate Street, who
had previously been the publisher of some other volumes
for me, had undertaken the publication of the first
edition of the present work. A short time previous
to its completion, I thought it right to call his
attention to the chapter in which the book-trade is
discussed; with the view both of making him acquainted
with what I had stated, and also of availing myself
of his knowledge in correcting any accidental error
as to the facts. Mr Fellowes, ’differing
from me entirely respecting the conclusions I had
arrived at’, then declined the publication of
the volume. If I had then chosen to apply to
some of those other booksellers, whose names appear
in the Committee of ‘The Trade’, it is
probable that they also would have declined the office
of publishing for me; and, had my object been to make
a case against the trade, such a course would have
assisted me. But I had no such feeling; and having
procured a complete copy of the whole work, I called
with it on Mr Knight, of Pall Mall East, whom until
that day I had never seen, and with whom I had never
previously had the slightest communication. I
left the book in Mr Knight’s hands, with a request
that, when he had read it, I might be informed whether
he would undertake the publication of it; and this
he consented to do. Mr Knight, therefore, is so
far from being responsible for a single opinion in
the present volume, that he saw it only, for a short
time, a few days previous to its publication.
It has been objected to me, that I
have exposed too freely the secrets of trade.
The only real secrets of trade are industry, integrity,
and knowledge: to the possessors of these no
exposure can be injurious; and they never fail to produce
respect and wealth.
The alterations in the present edition
are so frequent, that I found it impossible to comprise
them in a supplement. But the three new chapters,
‘On money as a medium of exchange’; ’On
a new system of manufacturing’; and ’On
the effect of machinery in reducing the demand for
labour’; will shortly be printed separately,
for the use of the purchasers of the first edition.
I am inclined to attach some importance
to the new system of manufacturing; and venture to
throw it out with the hope of its receiving a full
discussion among those who are most interested in
the subject. I believe that some such system of
conducting manufactories would greatly increase the
productive powers of any country adopting it; and
that our own possesses much greater facilities for
its application than other countries, in the greater
intelligence and superior education of the working
classes. The system would naturally commence in
some large town, by the union of some of the most
prudent and active workmen; and their example, if
successful, would be followed by others. The
small capitalist would next join them, and such factories
would go on increasing until competition compelled
the large capitalist to adopt the same system; and,
ultimately, the whole faculties of every man engaged
in manufacture would be concentrated upon one object—the
art of producing a good article at the lowest possible
cost—whilst the moral effect on that class
of the population would be useful in the highest degree,
since it would render character of far greater value
to the workman than it is at present.
To one criticism which has been made,
this volume is perfectly open. I have dismissed
the important subject of the patent-laws in a few
lines. The subject presents, in my opinion, great
difficulties, and I have been unwilling to write upon
it, because I do not see my way. I will only
here advert to one difficulty. What constitutes
an invention? Few simple mechanical contrivances
are new; and most combinations may be viewed as species,
and classed under genera of more or less generality;
and may, in consequence, be pronounced old or new,
according to the mechanical knowledge of the person
who gives his opinion.
Some of my critics have amused their
readers with the wildness of the schemes I have occasionally
thrown out; and I myself have sometimes smiled along
with them. Perhaps it were wiser for present
reputation to offer nothing but profoundly meditated
plans, but I do not think knowledge will be most advanced
by that course; such sparks may kindle the energies
of other minds more favourably circumstanced for pursuing
the enquiries. Thus I have now ventured to give
some speculations on the mode of blowing furnaces
for smelting iron; and even supposing them to be visionary,
it is of some importance thus to call the attention
of a large population, engaged in one of our most
extensive manufactures, to the singular fact, that
four-fifths of the steam power used to blow their furnaces
actually cools them.
I have collected, with some pains,
the criticisms* on the first edition of this work,
and have availed myself of much information which
has been communicated to me by my friends, for the
improvement of the present volume. If I have succeeded
in expressing that I had to explain with perspicuity,
I am aware that much of this clearness is due to my
friend, Dr Fitton, to whom both the present and the
former edition are indebted for such an examination
and correction, as an author himself has very rarely
the power to bestow.
[Footnote: Several of these
have probably escaped me, and I shall feel indebted
to any one who will inform my publisher of any future
remarks.]
22 November, 1832.