“Bishop Blougram’s Apology”
is made over the wine after dinner to defend himself
from the criticisms of a doubting young literary man,
who despises him because he considers that he cannot
be true to his convictions in conforming to the doctrines
of the Catholic Church. He builds up his defence
from the proposition that the problem of life is not
to conceive ideals which cannot be realized, but to
find what is and make it as fair as possible.
The bishop admits his unbelief, but being free to
choose either belief or unbelief, since neither can
be proved wholly true, chooses belief as his guiding
principle, because he finds it the best for making
his own life and that of others happy and comfortable
in this world. Once having chosen faith on this
ground, the more absolute the form of faith, the more
potent the results; besides, the bishop has that desire
of domination in his nature, which the authorization
of the Church makes safer for him. To Gigadibs’
objection that were his nature nobler, he would not
count this success, he replies he is as God made him,
and can but make the best of himself as he is.
To the objection that he addresses himself to grosser
estimators than he ought, he replies that all the
world is interested in the fact that a man of his
sense and learning, too, still believes at this late
hour. He points out the impossibility of his
following an ideal like Napoleon’s, for, conceding
the merest chance that doubt may be wrong, and judgment
to follow this life, he would not dare to slaughter
men as Napoleon had for such slight ends. As
for Shakespeare’s ideal, he can’t write
plays like his if he wanted to, but he has realized
things in his life which Shakespeare only imagined,
and which he presumes Shakespeare would not have scorned
to have realized in his life, judging from his fulfilled
ambition to be a gentleman of property at Stratford.
He admits, however, that enthusiasm in belief, such
as Luther’s, would be far preferable to his
own way of living, and after this, enthusiasm in unbelief,
which he might have if it were not for that plaguy
chance that doubt may be wrong. Gigadibs interposes
that the risk is as great for cool indifference as
for bold doubt. Blougram disputes that point
by declaring that doubts prove faith, and that man’s
free will preferring to have faith true to having
doubt true tips the balance in favor of faith, and
shows that man’s instinct or aspiration is toward
belief; that unquestioning belief, such as that of
the Past, has no moral effect on man, but faith which
knows itself through doubt is a moral spur.
Thus the arguments from expediency, instinct, and
consciousness, all bear on the side of faith, and
convince the bishop that it is safer to keep his faith
intact from his doubts. He then proves that
Gigadibs, with all his assumption of superiority in
his frankness of unbelief, is in about the same position
as himself, since the moral law which he follows has
no surer foundation than the religious law the bishop
follows, both founded upon instinct. The bishop
closes as he began, with the consciousness that rewards
for his way of living are of a substantial nature,
while Gigadibs has nothing to show for his frankness,
and does not hesitate to say that Gigadibs will consider
his conversation with the bishop the greatest honor
ever conferred upon him. The poet adds some
lines, somewhat apologetic for the bishop, intimating
that his arguments were suited to the calibre of his
critic, and that with a profounder critic he would
have made a more serious defence. Speaking of
a review of this poem by Cardinal Wiseman (1801-1865),
Browning says in a letter to a friend, printed in
Poet-lore, May, 1896: “The most curious
notice I ever had was from Cardinal Wiseman on Blougram—i.e.,
himself. It was in the Rambler, a Catholic
journal of those days, and certified to be his by
Father Prout, who said nobody else would have dared
put it in.” This review praises the poem
for its “fertility of illustration and felicity
of argument,” and says that “though utterly
mistaken in the very groundwork of religion, though
starting from the most unworthy notions of the work
of a Catholic bishop, and defending a self-indulgence
every honest man must feel to be disgraceful, [it]
is yet in its way triumphant.”
6. Brother Pugin: (1810-1852),
an eminent English architect, who, becoming a Roman
Catholic, designed many structures for that Church.
34. Corpus Christi Day:
Thursday after Trinity Sunday, when the Feast of the
Sacrament of the Altar is celebrated.
45. Che: what.
54. Count D’ Orsay:
(1798-1852), a clever Frenchman, distinguished as
a man of fashion, and for his drawings of horses.
113. Parma’s pride, the
’Jerome . . . Correggio . . . the Modenese:
the picture of Saint Jerome in the Ducal Academy at
Parma, by Correggio, who was born in the territory
of Modena, Italy.
184. A chorus-ending from Euripides:
the Greek dramatist, Euripides (480 B. C.- 406 B.
C.), frequently ended his choruses with this thought—sometimes
with slight variations in expression: “The
Gods perform many things contrary to our expectations,
and those things which we looked for are not accomplished;
but God hath brought to pass things unthought of.”
316. Peter’s . . . or rather,
Hildebrand’s: the claim of Hildebrand,
Pope Gregory VII (1073-1085) for temporal power and
authority exceeding Saint Peter’s, the founder
of the Roman Church.
411. Schelling: the German philosopher (1775-1854).
472. Austrian marriage:
the marriage of Marie Louise, daughter of the Emperor
of Austria, to Napoleon I.
475. Austerlitz: fought
with success by Napoleon, in 1805, against the coalition
of Austria, Russia, and England, and resulting in the
alliance mentioned with Austria and fresh overtures
to the Papal power and the old French nobility.
514. Trimmest house in Stratford:
New Place, a mansion in the heart of the town, built
for Sir Hugh Clopton, and known for two centuries
as his “great house,” bought with nearly
an acre of ground by Shakespeare, in 1597.
516. Giulio Romano: Italian
painter (1492-1546), referred to in “Winter’s
Tale,” v. ii. 105. —Dowland:
English musician, praised for his lute-playing in
a sonnet in “The Passionate Pilgrim,”
attributed to Shakespeare.
519. “Pandulph,”
etc.: quotation from “King John,”
iii. i. 138.
568. Luther: Martin (1483-1546),
whose enthusiasm reformed the Church.
577. Strauss: (1808-1874),
one of the Tuebingen philosophers, author of a Rationalistic
“Life of Jesus.”
626. “What think ye,” etc.:
Matthew 22.42.
664. Ichors o’er the place:
ichor=serum, which exudes where the skin is broken,
coats the hurt, and facilitates its healing.
667. Snake ’neath Michael’s
foot: Rafael’s picture in the Louvre of
Saint Michael slaying the dragon.
703. Brother Newman: John
Henry (1801-1890), leader of the Tractarian movement
at Oxford, which approached the doctrines of the Roman
Church. The last (90th) tract was entirely written
by him. The Bishop of Oxford was called upon
to stop the series, and in 1845 Dr. Newman entered
the Romish Church.
715. King Bomba: means King
Puffcheek, King Liar, a sobriquet given to Ferdinand
II, late king of the Two Sicilies. —Lazzaroni:
Naples beggars, so called from the Lazarus of the
Parable, Luke 16.20.
716. Antonelli: Cardinal,
secretary of Pope Pius IX.
728. Naples’ liquefaction:
the supposed miracle of the liquefaction of the blood
of Saint Januarius the Martyr. A small quantity
of it is preserved in a crystal reliquary in the great
church at Naples, and when brought into the presence
of the head of the saint, it melts.
732. Decrassify: make less crass or gross.
744. Fichte: (1761-1814),
celebrated German metaphysician, who defined God as
the “moral order of the universe.”
877. “Pastor est tui Dominus”:
the Lord is your shepherd.
915. Anacreon: Greek lyric
poet of the sixth century B. C.
972. In partibus Episcopus,
etc.: “In countries where the Roman
Catholic faith is not regularly established, as it
was not in England before the time of Cardinal Wiseman,
there were no bishops of sees in the kingdom itself,
but they took their titles from heathen lands.”