Everywhere there was laughter, everywhere tears.
Men and women in the common life,
finding themselves suddenly lit and exalted, capable
of doing what had hitherto been impossible, incapable
of doing what had hitherto been irresistible, happy,
hopeful, unselfishly energetic, rejected altogether
the supposition that this was merely a change in the
blood and material texture of life. They denied
the bodies God had given them, as once the Upper Nile
savages struck out their canine teeth, because these
made them like the beasts. They declared that
this was the coming of a spirit, and nothing else
would satisfy their need for explanations. And
in a sense the Spirit came. The Great Revival
sprang directly from the Change—the last,
the deepest, widest, and most enduring of all the
vast inundations of religious emotion that go by that
name.
But indeed it differed essentially
from its innumerable predecessors. The former
revivals were a phase of fever, this was the first
movement of health, it was altogether quieter, more
intellectual, more private, more religious than any
of those others. In the old time, and more especially
in the Protestant countries where the things of religion
were outspoken, and the absence of confession and
well-trained priests made religious states of emotion
explosive and contagious, revivalism upon various
scales was a normal phase in the religious life, revivals
were always going on—now a little disturbance
of consciences in a village, now an evening of emotion
in a Mission Room, now a great storm that swept a continent,
and now an organized effort that came to town with
bands and banners and handbills and motor-cars for
the saving of souls. Never at any time did I
take part in nor was I attracted by any of these movements.
My nature, although passionate, was too critical (or
sceptical if you like, for it amounts to the same thing)
and shy to be drawn into these whirls; but on several
occasions Parload and I sat, scoffing, but nevertheless
disturbed, in the back seats of revivalist meetings.
I saw enough of them to understand
their nature, and I am not surprised to learn now
that before the comet came, all about the world, even
among savages, even among cannibals, these same, or
at any rate closely similar, periodic upheavals went
on. The world was stifling; it was in a fever,
and these phenomena were neither more nor less than
the instinctive struggle of the organism against the
ebb of its powers, the clogging of its veins, the limitation
of its life. Invariably these revivals followed
periods of sordid and restricted living. Men
obeyed their base immediate motives until the world
grew unendurably bitter. Some disappointment,
some thwarting, lit up for them—darkly
indeed, but yet enough for indistinct vision—the
crowded squalor, the dark inclosure of life.
A sudden disgust with the insensate smallness of the
old-world way of living, a realization of sin, a sense
of the unworthiness of all individual things, a desire
for something comprehensive, sustaining, something
greater, for wider communions and less habitual things,
filled them. Their souls, which were shaped for
wider issues, cried out suddenly amidst the petty
interests, the narrow prohibitions, of life, “Not
this! not this!” A great passion to escape from
the jealous prison of themselves, an inarticulate,
stammering, weeping passion shook them. . . .
I have seen------ I remember how once in Clayton Calvinistic
Methodist chapel I saw—­his spotty fat face strangely distorted
under the flickering gas-flares—­old Pallet the ironmonger repent. 
He went to the form of repentance, a bench reserved for such
exhibitions, and slobbered out his sorrow and disgust for some
sexual indelicacy—­he was a widower—­and I can see now how his
loose fat body quivered and swayed with his grief.  He poured it
out to five hundred people, from whom in common times he hid his
every thought and purpose.  And it is a fact, it shows where reality
lay, that we two youngsters laughed not at all at that blubbering
grotesque, we did not even think the distant shadow of a smile. 
We two sat grave and intent—­perhaps wondering.
Only afterward and with an effort did we scoff. .
. .
Those old-time revivals were, I say,
the convulsive movements of a body that suffocates.
They are the clearest manifestations from before the
Change of a sense in all men that things were not right.
But they were too often but momentary illuminations.
Their force spent itself in inco-ordinated shouting,
gesticulations, tears. They were but flashes
of outlook. Disgust of the narrow life, of all
baseness, took shape in narrowness and baseness.
The quickened soul ended the night a hypocrite; prophets
disputed for precedence; seductions, it is altogether
indisputable, were frequent among penitents! and Ananias
went home converted and returned with a falsified
gift. And it was almost universal that the converted
should be impatient and immoderate, scornful of reason
and a choice of expedients, opposed to balance, skill,
and knowledge. Incontinently full of grace, like
thin old wine-skins overfilled, they felt they must
burst if once they came into contact with hard fact
and sane direction.
So the former revivals spent themselves,
but the Great Revival did not spend itself, but grew
to be, for the majority of Christendom at least, the
permanent expression of the Change. For many it
has taken the shape of an outright declaration that
this was the Second Advent—it is not for
me to discuss the validity of that suggestion, for
nearly all it has amounted to an enduring broadening
of all the issues of life. . . .