Charles and Tibby met at Ducie Street,
where the latter was staying. Their interview
was short and absurd. They had nothing in common
but the English language, and tried by its help to
express what neither of them understood. Charles
saw in Helen the family foe. He had singled her
out as the most dangerous of the Schlegels, and, angry
as he was, looked forward to telling his wife how
right he had been. His mind was made up at once;
the girl must be got out of the way before she disgraced
them farther. If occasion offered she might be
married to a villain, or, possibly, to a fool.
But this was a concession to morality, it formed no
part of his main scheme. Honest and hearty was
Charles’s dislike, and the past spread itself
out very clearly before him; hatred is a skilful compositor.
As if they were heads in a note-book, he ran through
all the incidents of the Schlegels’ campaign:
the attempt to compromise his brother, his mother’s
legacy, his father’s marriage, the introduction
of the furniture, the unpacking of the same.
He had not yet heard of the request to sleep at Howards
End; that was to be their master-stroke and the opportunity
for his. But he already felt that Howards End
was the objective, and, though he disliked the house,
was determined to defend it.
Tibby, on the other hand, had no opinions.
He stood above the conventions: his sister had
a right to do what she thought right. It is not
difficult to stand above the conventions when we leave
no hostages among them; men can always be more unconventional
than women, and a bachelor of independent means need
encounter no difficulties at all. Unlike Charles,
Tibby had money enough; his ancestors had earned it
for him, and if he shocked the people in one set of
lodgings he had only to move into another. His
was the leisure without sympathy—an attitude
as fatal as the strenuous; a little cold culture may
be raised on it, but no art. His sisters had
seen the family danger, and had never forgotten to
discount the gold islets that raised them from the
sea. Tibby gave all the praise to himself, and
so despised the struggling and the submerged.
Hence the absurdity of the interview;
the gulf between them was economic as well as spiritual.
But several facts passed; Charles pressed for them
with an impertinence that the undergraduate could
not withstand. On what date had Helen gone abroad?
To whom? (Charles was anxious to fasten the scandal
on Germany.) Then, changing his tactics, he said roughly:
“I suppose you realise that you are your sister’s
protector?”
“In what sense?”
“If a man played about with
my sister, I’d send a bullet through him, but
perhaps you don’t mind.”
“I mind very much,” protested Tibby.
“Who d’ye suspect, then?
Speak out man. One always suspects some one.”
“No one. I don’t
think so.” Involuntarily he blushed.
He had remembered the scene in his Oxford rooms.
“You are hiding something,”
said Charles. As interviews go, he got the best
of this one. “When you saw her last, did
she mention any one’s name? Yes or no!”
he thundered, so that Tibby started.
“In my rooms she mentioned some
friends, called the Basts.”
“Who are the Basts?”
“People—friends of hers at Evie’s
wedding.”
“I don’t remember.
But, by great Scott, I do! My aunt told me about
some rag-tsag. Was she full of them when you saw
her? Is there a man? Did she speak of the
man? Or—look here—have you
had any dealings with him?”
Tibby was silent. Without intending
it, he had betrayed his sister’s confidence;
he was not enough interested in human life to see
where things will lead to. He had a strong regard
for honesty, and his word, once given, had always
been kept up to now. He was deeply vexed, not
only for the harm he had done Helen, but for the flaw
he had discovered in his own equipment.
“I see—you are in
his confidence. They met at your rooms. Oh,
what a family, what a family! God help the poor
pater—s”
And Tibby found himself alone.