TOBACCO AS AN INCITANT TO THE USE OF ALCOHOLIC STIMULANTS,
AND AN
OBSTACLE IN THE WAY OF A PERMANENT REFORMATION.
BY DR. R.P. HARRIS, PHYSICIAN OF THE “FRANKLIN
REFORMATORY HOME.”
When we consider the almost universal
use of tobacco, especially in the form of smoking,
among our male population, it is not to be wondered
at that this powerful poison has come to be regarded
as an innocent and almost necessary vegetable production,
not to be used as food exactly, but greatly allied
to it as an article of daily consumption. Few
stop to reason about its properties or effects; they
remember, perhaps, how sick they were made by the
first chew or smoke, but this having long passed,
believe that as their systems have become accustomed,
apparently, to the poison, it cannot be doing
them any real injury. When we reflect that tobacco
contains from one to nearly seven per cent, of nicotine—one
of the most powerful vegetable poisons known—a
few drops of which are sufficient to destroy life,
it is not difficult to perceive that this faith in
the innocence begotten of use must be fallacious.
We have met with instances where the poisonous effects
of tobacco were manifest after every smoke, even where
the attempt to accustom the system to its use had
been persevered in for many years; and yet the men
never realized what was the matter with them, until
they had, under medical advice, ceased to use the
drug.
Before the discovery of anæsthetics,
tobacco was used as a remedy to produce relaxation
in cases of strangulated hernia; and although very
cautiously administered in the form of tea, or smoke
per rectum, proved fatal in many instances. As
little as twelve grains in six ounces of water having
thus acted; and from half a drachm to two drachms in
a number of instances. When men chew as high
as a pound and a quarter of strong navy tobacco a
week, or three packages of fine-cut in a day, it must
certainly tell upon them sooner or later; or even in
much less quantity.
If men used tobacco in moderation,
there would be much less objection to it, if it was
not so intimately
ASSOCIATED WITH THE HABIT OF DRINKING.
This is recognized by the trade, in
the fact that we see many tobacco stores as the entrance
to drinking saloons. Ninety-three per cent. of
the men who have been admitted to the Franklin Reformatory
Home used tobacco, and eighty per cent. of them chewed
it. There may be possibly as high as ninety-three
per cent. of male adults who smoke, but eighty per
cent. of chewers is undoubtedly a large proportion
as compared with those in the same ranks of society
who do not drink.
Although the poisonous symptoms of
tobacco are, in a great degree, the same in different
persons at the inception of the habit, the effects
vary materially in after years according to the quantity
and variety used, the form employed and the habits
and temperament of the user. One man will chew
a paper a week, another four, many use one a day, and
a few from one and a half to three a day, besides
smoking. Occasionally, but very rarely, we find
a man who limits himself to one cigar a day, a number
allow themselves but three, but of later years even
these are moderate compared with those who use eight,
ten or more.
There are many men who, for years,
preserve a robust, hale appearance under both tobacco
and whisky, who are, notwithstanding their apparent
health, steadily laying the foundation of diseased
heart, or
DERANGEMENT OF THE DIGESTIVE ORGANS
or nervous system from the former,
or an organic fatal disease of the liver or kidneys
from the latter.
Healthy-looking men are often rejected
by examiners of life insurance companies because of
irregular and intermittent action of the heart from
tobacco; and equally robust subjects are forced to
abandon the habit because of tremors, vertigo or a
peculiar form of dyspepsia. We have known men
who died from the use of tobacco, and others who met
a like fate from whisky, who were never fully in the
state denominated drunk. Men may earn a hobnail
liver and dropsy by the constant, steady use of alcoholic
drink taken systematically, so as always to keep within
the limits of intoxication; or they may, in the same
way, get a diabetes or Bright’s disease.
Abundant testimony in regard to the
effects of tobacco in creating an appetite for strong
drink has been given by the inmates of the Franklin
Home. In a few exceptional cases the use of tobacco
does not appear to create any sense of thirst; and
this is specially the case with the smokers who do
not spit when smoking. Some men seem to be free
from any alcoholic craving when using tobacco, and
say that when they commence to drink they give up
the drug for the time being. These are exceptional
cases, for excess in drinking generally leads to an
excess in the use of tobacco, often to double the
amount ordinarily employed. We have often been
told by moderate drinkers, that they frequently
FELT A DESIRE FOR A LITTLE WHISKY AFTER A SMOKE,
and they have confessed that they
were only saved from a habit of drinking to excess
by the fact that they had no innate fondness for alcoholic
stimulation. Unfortunately, there is a large and
increasing class of men who, finding that water does
not, but that alcohol does, relieve the dryness of
throat and diseased thirst resulting from tobacco,
are led, little by little, into the habit of using
whisky to excess. Such men, after, it may be,
a long abstinence, are not unfrequently led back into
their old habits by an attack of nervousness, resulting
from a temporary excessive use of tobacco, and a feeling
that all that is wanting to relieve this is a glass
of whisky, which being taken, at once determines a
debauch of long or short duration, according to the
habits and character of the party. Many a so-called
periodical drinker fixes the return of his period
by an act of this kind, and with such cases it is
all-important to their permanent reformation, that
they should cease entirely and forever from the use
of tobacco. We have, in a few instances, prevailed
upon men to do this, but in a large majority of cases,
where they have admitted the connection between the
two habits, in their own person, or volunteered to
tell how much tobacco had acted in forming and keeping
up their appetite for whisky, they have failed in
being able to sum up sufficient resolution to abandon
the use of the drug, saying that they felt the importance
of the step, and would be glad to be able to give
it up, but that the habit was
TEN TIMES AS DIFFICULT TO CONQUER AS THAT OF WHISKY-DRINKING.
All that we have been able to accomplish
in such cases has been to check the excessive use.
We have repeatedly assured men, after a careful examination
of their peculiar cases, that they would certainly
drink again unless they gave up their tobacco, and
have seen this opinion verified, because they took
no heed to the warning. We have also been gratified
in a few instances by hearing a man say that he felt
confident that he could never have accomplished his
reformation as he had done, if he had not taken the
advice given him about abandoning his tobacco.
In contrast with the men of weak purpose, we have
to admire one who had resolution enough to break off
the three habits of opium-eating, whisky-drinking
and tobacco-chewing—no trifling matter—when
the first was of ten and the last of more than thirty
years’ duration.
We have been repeatedly asked which
was the most injurious, smoking or chewing, and have
replied, that everything depended upon the amount of
nicotine absorbed in the process, and the loss to the
system in the saliva spit out. Men have died
from the direct effect of excessive smoking, and quite
recently a death in a child was reported from the
result of blowing soap-bubbles with an old wooden pipe.
We have known a little boy to vomit from drawing air
a few times through the empty meerschaum pipe of his
German teacher. The smoking of two pipes as the
first essay, very nearly caused the death of a young
man, whose case was reported by Dr. Marshall Hall.
The least poisonous tobaccos are those
of Syria and Turkey, but the cigarettes made of them
in the East and imported into this country are said
to be impregnated with opium. Virginia tobacco,
for the pipe or chewing, contains a large percentage
of nicotine, and the former is often impregnated with
foreign matters, recognizable by the choking effect
of the smoke when inhaled, or by the removal of the
epithelium (outer skin) of the tongue at the point
under the end of the pipe-stem.
If we fail in our efforts to reform
the tobacco habit, the next best thing to do, is to
show men what the nature and capabilities of the poison
are, and endeavor to persuade them to use the milder
varieties and in a moderate quantity.
ONE OF THE GREAT CURSES OF THE RISING GENERATION
is the passion for imitating and acquiring
the evil habits of men, under an impression that it
hastens their approach to manhood. Weak, frail,
delicate boys, with inherited tendencies to disease,
who should, by all means, never use tobacco, or anything
injurious, are often as obstinately bent upon learning
to smoke, in spite of medical advice, as those in
whom a moderate use would be far less objectionable.
A recent observer, in examining into the cases of
thirty-eight boys who had formed the habit of using
tobacco, found that twenty-seven of them had also
a fondness for alcoholic stimulants. A large proportion
of the Franklin Home inmates attribute their habit
of drinking to the effects of company; many commenced
in the army, and many were induced to drink at first
by invitation. If smoking was a solitary habit,
it would be less likely to lead to drinking; but the
same companionship, and habits of treating prevail,
as in the saloon, and the step from the estaminet
to the bar-room under invitation, is an easy one, where
the diseased thirst, so often induced by tobacco,
favors the movement to treat.
We have no prejudice against tobacco,
other than what would naturally arise in the mind
from a careful examination of the effects of the poison
in hundreds of cases. We have seen large, hale-looking
men forced in time to abandon, although very reluctantly,
the use of tobacco in every form; and the most bitter
enemy we have ever met to the vile weed as
he termed it, was a physician, who had been forced
to give up chewing on account of the state of his
heart, after years of indulgence. We have seen
many such instances, and, in one case, the abandonment
of the habit entirely cured a dyspepsia of twenty-eight
years’ standing.