MEANS OF CURE.
Is this disease, or vice, or sin,
or crime of intemperance—call it by what
name you will—increasing or diminishing?
Has any impression been made upon it during the half-century
in which there have been such earnest and untiring
efforts to limit its encroachments on the health,
prosperity, happiness and life of the people?
What are the agencies of repression at work; how effective
are they, and what is each doing?
These are questions full of momentous
interest. Diseases of the body, if not cured,
work a steady impairment of health, and bring pains
and physical disabilities. If their assaults
be upon nervous centres, or vital organs, the danger
of paralysis or death becomes imminent. Now, as
to this disease of intemperance, which is a social
and moral as well as a physical disease, it is not
to be concealed that it has invaded the common body
of the people to an alarming degree, until, using the
words of Holy Writ, “the whole head is sick
and the whole heart faint.” Nay, until,
using a still stronger form of Scriptural illustration,
“From the sole of the foot even unto the head,
there is no soundness in it; but wounds and bruises
and putrifying sores.”
In this view, the inquiry as to increase
or diminution, assumes the gravest importance.
If, under all the agencies of cure and reform which
have been in active operation during the past fifty
years, no impression has been made upon this great
evil which is so cursing the people, then is the case
indeed desperate, if not hopeless. But if it appears
that, under these varied agencies, there has been
an arrest of the disease here, a limitation of its
aggressive force there, its almost entire extirpation
in certain cases, and a better public sentiment everywhere;
then, indeed, may we take heart and say “God
speed temperance work!” in all of its varied
aspects.
HOPEFUL SIGNS.
And here, at the outset of our presentation
of some of the leading agencies of reform and cure,
let us say, that the evidence going to show that an
impression has been made upon the disease is clear
and indisputable; and that this impression is so marked
as to give the strongest hope and assurance.
In the face of prejudice, opposition, ridicule, persecution,
obloquy and all manner of discouragements, the advocates
of temperance have held steadily to their work these
many years, and now the good results are seen on every
hand. Contrast the public sentiment of to-day
with that of twenty, thirty and forty years ago, and
the progress becomes at once apparent. In few
things is this so marked as in the changed attitude
of the medical profession towards alcohol. One
of the most dangerous, and, at the same time, one of
the most securely intrenched of all our enemies, was
the family doctor. Among his remedies and restoratives,
wine, brandy, whisky and tonic ale all held a high
place, and were administered more frequently, perhaps,
than any other articles in the Materia Medica.
The disease of his patients arrested by special remedies
or broken by an effort of nature, he too often commenced
the administration of alcohol in some one or more
of its disguised and attractive forms, in order to
give tone and stimulus to the stomach and nerves,
and as a general vitalizer and restorative. The
evil consequences growing out of this almost universal
prescription of alcohol, were of the most lamentable
character, and thousands and tens of thousands of
men and women were betrayed into drunkenness.
But to-day, you will not find a physician of any high
repute in America or Europe who will give it to his
patients, except in the most guarded manner and under
the closest limitations; and he will not consent to
any self-prescription whatever.
FRUITS OF TEMPERANCE WORK.
Is not this a great gain? And
it has come as the result of temperance work and agitation,
as Dr. Henry Monroe frankly admits in his lecture on
the Physiological Action of Alcohol, where, after stating
that his remarks would not partake of the character
of a total abstinence lecture, but rather of a scientific
inquiry into the mode of action of alcohol when introduced
into the tissues of the body, he adds: “Nevertheless,
I would not have it understood that I, in any way,
disparage the moral efforts made by total abstainers
who, years ago, amid good report and evil report,
stood in the front of the battle to war against the
multitude of evils occasioned by strong drink;—all
praise be due to them for their noble and self-denying
exertions! Had it not been for the successful
labors of these moral giants in the great cause of
temperance, presenting to the world in their own personal
experiences many new and astounding physiological facts,
men of science would, probably, never have had
their attention drawn to the topic.”
Then, as a result of temperance work,
we have a more restrictive legislation in many States,
and prohibitory laws in New Hampshire, Vermont and
Maine. In the State of Maine, a prohibitory law
has been in operation for over twenty-six years; and
so salutary has been the effect as seen in the
REDUCTION OF POVERTY, PAUPERISM AND CRIME,
that the Legislature, in January,
1877, added new and heavier penalties to the law,
both Houses passing on the amendment without a dissenting
voice. In all that State there is not, now, a
single distillery or brewery in operation, nor a single
open bar-room.
Forty years ago the pulpit was almost
silent on the subject of intemperance and the liquor
traffic; now, the church is fast arraying itself on
the side of total abstinence and prohibition, and among
its ministers are to be found many of our most active
temperance workers.
Forty or fifty years ago, the etiquette
of hospitality was violated if wine, or cordial, or
brandy were not tendered. Nearly every sideboard
had its display of decanters, well filled, and it was
almost as much an offense for the guest to decline
as for the host to omit the proffered glass.
Even boys and girls were included in the custom; and
tastes were acquired which led to drunkenness in after
life. All this is changed now.
The curse of the liquor traffic is
attracting, as never before, the attention of all
civilized people; and national, State and local legislatures
and governments are appointing commissions of inquiry,
and gathering data and facts, with a view to its restriction.
And, more hopeful than all, signs
are becoming more and more apparent that the people
are everywhere awakening to a sense of the dangers
that attend this traffic. Enlightenment is steadily
progressing. Reason and judgment; common sense
and prudence, are all coming to the aid of repression.
Men see, as they never saw before, how utterly evil
and destructive are the drinking habits of this and
other nations; how they weaken the judgment and deprave
the moral sense; how they not only take from every
man who falls into them his ability to do his best
in any pursuit or calling, but sow in his body the
germs of diseases which will curse him in his later
years and abridge their term.
Other evidences of the steady growth
among the people of a sentiment adverse to drinking
might be given. We see it in the almost feverish
response that everywhere meets the strong appeals of
temperance speakers, and in the more pronounced attitude
taken by public and professional men.
JUDGES ON THE BENCH
and preachers from the pulpit alike
lift their voices in condemnation. Grand juries
repeat and repeat their presentations of liquor selling
and liquor drinking as the fruitful source of more
than two-thirds of the crimes and miseries that afflict
the community; and prison reports add their painful
emphasis to the warning of the inquest.
The people learn slowly, but they
are learning. Until they will that this
accursed traffic shall cease, it must go on with its
sad and awful consequences. But the old will
of the people has been debased by sensual indulgence.
It is too weak to set itself against the appetite by
which it has become enslaved. There must be a
new will formed in the ground of enlightenment and
intelligence; and then, out of knowing what is right
and duty in regard to this great question of temperance
and restriction, will come the will to do. And
when we have this new will resting in the true enlightenment
of the people, we shall have no impeded action.
Whatever sets itself in opposition thereto must go
down.
And for this the time is coming, though
it may still be far off. Of its steady approach,
the evidences are many and cheering. Meanwhile,
we must work and wait. If we are not yet strong
enough to drive out the enemy, we may limit his power,
and do
THE WORK OF HEALING AND SAVING.
What, then, is being done in this
work of healing and saving? Is there, in fact,
any cure for the dreadful malady of drunkenness?
Are men ever really saved from its curse? and, if
so, how is it done, and what are the agencies employed?
Among the first of these to which
we shall refer, is the pledge. As a means of
reform and restriction, it has been used by temperance
workers from the beginning, and still holds a prominent
place. Seeing that only in a complete abstinence
from intoxicating drinks was there any hope of rescue
for the drunkard, or any security for the moderate
drinker, it was felt that under a solemn pledge to
wholly abstain from their use, large numbers of men
would, from a sense of honor, self-respect or conscience,
hold themselves free from touch or taste. In the
case of moderate drinkers, with whom appetite is yet
under control, the pledge has been of great value;
but almost useless after appetite has gained the mastery.
In a simple pledge there is no element
of self-control. If honor, self-respect or conscience,
rallying to its support in the hour of temptation,
be not stronger than appetite, it will be of no avail.
And it too often happens that, with the poor inebriate,
these have become blunted, or well-nigh extinguished.
The consequence has been that where the pledge has
been solely relied upon, the percentage of reform has
been very small. As a first means of rescue, it
is invaluable; because it is, on the part of him who
takes it, a complete removal of himself from the sphere
of temptation, and so long as he holds himself away
from the touch and taste of liquor, he is safe.
If the pledge will enable him to do this, then the
pledge will save him. But it is well known, from
sad experience, that only a few are saved by the pledge.
The strength that saves must be something more than
the external bond of a promise; it must come from
within, and be grounded in a new and changed life,
internally as well as externally. If the reformed
man, after he takes his pledge, does not endeavor
to lead a better moral life—does not keep
himself away from old debasing associations—does
not try, earnestly and persistently, to become, in
all things,
A TRUER, PURER, NOBLER MAN,
then his pledge is only as a hoop,
that any overstrain may break, and not an internal
bond, holding in integrity all things from the centre
to the circumference of his life.
So well is this now understood, that
little reliance is had on the pledge in itself, though
its use is still general. It is regarded as a
first and most important step in the right direction.
As the beginning of a true and earnest effort on the
part of some unhappy soul to break the bonds of a
fearful slavery. But few would think of leaving
such a soul to the saving power of the pledge alone.
If other help came not, the effort would be, except
in rare cases, too surely, all in vain.
The need of something more reliable
than a simple pledge has led to other means of reform
and cure, each taking character and shape from the
peculiar views of those who have adopted them.
Inebriate Asylums and Reformatory Homes have been
established in various parts of the country, and through
their agency many who were once enslaved by drink are
being restored to society and good citizenship.
In what is popularly known as the “Gospel Temperance”
movement, the weakness of the pledge, in itself, is
recognized, and, “God being my helper,”
is declared to be the ultimate and only sure dependence.
It is through this abandonment of
all trust in the pledge, beyond a few exceptional
cases, that reformatory work rises to its true sphere
and level of success. And we shall now endeavor
to show what is being done in the work of curing drunkards,
as well in asylums and Reformatory Homes, as by the
so-called “Gospel” methods. In this
we shall, as far as possible, let each of these important
agencies speak for itself, explaining its own methods
and giving its own results. All are accomplishing
good in their special line of action; all are saving
men from the curse of drink, and the public needs
to be more generally advised of what they are doing.