Ethics

But of the good are we to make as many as ever we can, or is there any measure of the number of friends, as there is of the number to constitute a Political Community?  I mean, you cannot make one out of ten men, and if you increase the number to one hundred thousand it is not any longer a Community.  However, the number is not perhaps some one definite number but any between certain extreme limits.

[Sidenote:  1171_a_] Well, of friends likewise there is a limited number, which perhaps may be laid down to be the greatest number with whom it would be possible to keep up intimacy; this being thought to be one of the greatest marks of Friendship, and it being quite obvious that it is not possible to be intimate with many, in other words, to part one’s self among many.  And besides it must be remembered that they also are to be friends to one another if they are all to live together:  but it is a matter of difficulty to find this in many men at once.

It comes likewise to be difficult to bring home to one’s self the joys and sorrows of many:  because in all probability one would have to sympathise at the same time with the joys of this one and the sorrows of that other.

Perhaps then it is well not to endeavour to have very many friends but so many as are enough for intimacy:  because, in fact, it would seem not to be possible to be very much a friend to many at the same time:  and, for the same reason, not to be in love with many objects at the same time:  love being a kind of excessive Friendship which implies but one object:  and all strong emotions must be limited in the number towards whom they are felt.

And if we look to facts this seems to be so:  for not many at a time become friends in the way of companionship, all the famous Friendships of the kind are between two persons:  whereas they who have many friends, and meet everybody on the footing of intimacy, seem to be friends really to no one except in the way of general society; I mean the characters denominated as over-complaisant.

To be sure, in the way merely of society, a man may be a friend to many without being necessarily over-complaisant, but being truly good:  but one cannot be a friend to many because of their virtue, and for the persons’ own sake; in fact, it is a matter for contentment to find even a few such.