A traveller perishing of thirst in
a desert, debated with his camel whether they should
continue their journey, or turn back to an oasis they
had passed some days before. The traveller favoured
the latter plan.
“I am decidedly opposed to any
such waste of time,” said the animal; “I
don’t care for oases myself.”
“I should not care for them
either,” retorted the man, with some temper,
“if, like you, I carried a number of assorted
water-tanks inside. But as you will not submit
to go back, and I shall not consent to go forward,
we can only remain where we are.”
“But,” objected the camel,
“that will be certain death to you!”
“Not quite,” was the quiet
answer, “it involves only the loss of my camel.”
So saying, he assassinated the beast,
and appropriated his liquid store.
A compromise is not always a settlement
satisfactory to both parties.
|